India: Muslim boys kidnap and murder their 14-year-old Hindu friend, a post from

They killed him when their ransom demands were not met. This is all according to Islamic law. Here is a salient passage on this issue from a Shafi’i manual of Islamic law:

When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph considers the interests … (of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy. (Reliance of the Traveller o9.14)

A revered Islamic jurist, Al-Mawardi, agrees with Reliance of the Traveller:

As for the captives, the amir has the choice of taking the most beneficial action of four possibilities: the first, to put them to death by cutting their necks; the second, to enslave them and apply the laws of slavery regarding their sale or manumission; the third, to ransom them in exchange for goods or prisoners; and fourth, to show favor to them and pardon them. (Al-Ahkam As-Sultaniyyah (The Laws of Islamic Governance), 4.5)

“My son was lynched by his Muslim friends: Mother of 14-year-old cries for justice,” by Priyanka Sharma, Mail Today, July 16, 2017:

A mysterious case of the murder of a 14-year-old boy has surfaced in the national Capital, with his mother alleging that he was held hostage and lynched by some Muslim friends.

The victim, identified as Yogesh Kumar, was found dead under mysterious circumstances near New Delhi Railway Station last month. Multiple injury marks were found all over his face and the body indicated that he was battered to death, doctors said. However, police remain tight-lipped over the cause of death considering it a communally sensitive matter.

Yogesh (14) was found in a pool of blood near the New Delhi Railway Station with blunt injuries on his face, back and neck.

Yogesh’s body was brought to the Lady Hardinge Medical College (LHMC) by police for the postmortem examination on June 23. Doctors who conducted autopsy said the injuries on his body were clear signs of his being attacked with a sharp object. Victim’s mother, Seema alleged it was case of lynching by his Muslim friends, who had demanded money from her while keeping Yogesh hostage. She even claimed that they made her hear Yogesh’s voice for once who was trembling with fear.


Recalling the horrifying incident to Mail Today, she said, “On June 23, Yogesh left home after he got a call from his friend Arif. He, along with other friends, including a girl Fatima, first kidnapped my son, later demanding Rs 10,000 from me. I was told that if money was not given on time, they will kill my son.” “The very next morning, I was told that my son was killed and thrown somewhere along the railway track near New Delhi station,” Seema said. Yogesh’s family lives in Shahadra’s Meet Nagar. Despite being very young, he had been working to fetch money for his mother’s treatment….

UK “journalist” says she doesn’t know religion of Muslim rape gangs, it’s “irrelevant”
Florida: No death penalty for Muslim who killed men for disrespecting his conversion to Islam
    1. nicu says

      August 13, 2017 at 11:39 am

      Even Muslim ” kids ” are criminals – taught by their parents , elder brothers and the book of the devil !

      May he return and let them pay ! Why the whole world surrenders to these Neanderthals ???

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mohammed was a prophet of great wisdom who devised a test to find out which rats are Jews and which are not

(8) Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “A group of Israelites were lost. Nobody knows what they did. But I do not see them except that they were cursed and changed into rats, for if you put the milk of a she-camel in front of a rat, it will not drink it, but if the milk of a sheep is put in front of it, it will drink it.” I told this to Ka’b who asked me, “Did you hear it from the Prophet ?” I said, “Yes.” Ka’b asked me the same question several times.; I said to Ka’b. “Do I read the Torah? (i.e. I tell you this from the Prophet.)”  (Book #54, Hadith #524)

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

The Original Sin of rejecting prophets, and being inveterately wicked from the beginning to the end of time to boot, is Allah and Mohammed’s gift to the Jews. Flying in the face of this fact Muslims claim that they don’t believe in Original Sin. Just more hypocrisy and inconsistency courtesy of Islam

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Allah and Mohammed will never forgive the Jews for rejecting him. So much for Allah and Mohammed’s mercy

The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Shabir Ally’s Contradictions and Inconsistencies Pt. 1 By Sam Shamoun

Here begins a new series where we will highlight the many contradictions and blunders that noted Muhammadan taqiyyist and polemicist Shabir Ally has made throughout the years in his various talks, debates, and supposed dialogues. These errors provide further confirmation for my accusation that Ally is not interested in being truthful or consistent, since truth is not a priority for him. What matters to him is to defend Islam by any means necessary, even if those means entail having to contradict oneself and/or employ inconsistent arguments. For Ally, the ends do justify the means.

Here is what Ally had to say regarding God requiring substitutionary atonement for the forgiveness of sins in response to my question concerning Muhammad’s teaching that Allah would torture Jews and Christians in hell as a ransom for all the crimes and wickedness carried out by Muslims:

“So when we look at the question of substitutionary sacrifice the problem that occurs in the Christian concept is that, if God forgave us because Jesus died for our sins then it’s not really a forgiveness; it’s… God got his blood anyway, whether from his Son OR SOMEBODY ELSE, and he’s satisfied. And if you wanna thank somebody we should thank Jesus not God. It look likes God is a wrathful, vengeful God, and the Son is the one who is loving and kind to us. And in that case we should ask, ‘isn’t God kind to his Son?’…” (Do Muslims believe in the Doctrine of Substitutionary Atonement? – Dr. Shabir Ally)

Ally made the same point in a more recent debate with a young Christian apologist named Luis Dizon, as he appealed to the parable of the prodigal son (cf. Luke 15:11-32), and “The Lord’s Prayer” (cf. Matthew 6:9-13; Luke 11:1-5):

“… The son disobeys his father, he goes away but when he returns, the father welcomes him, and nobody dies for his sins nobody pays for his sins… Then see what it says: ‘forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.’ So that is speaking to the Muslim doctrine of salvation through the forgiveness of sins, not through the blood atonement of somebody else.

“On the other hand–I have just one minute left–if you say that Jesus came and died as a ransom for many, as Luis quoted a verse to mean, well then who was the ransom paid to? These are complications! It could not be that the ransom is paid to the devil, that makes the devil have equal bargaining terms with God, so God has to give his Son to the devil to buy us back. Doesn’t seem right! It can’t be paid to God as if God somehow needs his pint of blood regardless of whether he gets it from us, or from his Son. It doesn’t make sense either way! The best way out of this dilemma is to say that Jesus taught the doctrine of the forgiveness of sins so that if we turn back to God, he is willing and he will forgive us.” (Christians & Muslims Perspective On The Nature & Intertextual of Their Scriptures)

And yet in the first rebuttal period of this particular debate, Ally made the following comments in response to Dizon’s assertion that the Quran is not in continuity with the OT teaching that atoning sacrifices are needed in order to obtain the forgiveness of sins:

“The atonement. I would say yes, the Quran does have a continuity with atonement, because for example sacrifice–we do an annual sacrifice commemorating the sacrifice of Abraham. When a child is born we also do a sacrifice on behalf of the child. And we believe that these sacrifices entail the forgiveness of sins, or these CAUSE the forgiveness of sins to flow from God, or this is the way BY WHICH WE OBTAIN the forgiveness of sins. That’s one way.”

Suffice it to say, not only does this exemplify Ally’s willingness to contradict himself in order score debate points, it now places Ally in the very dilemma which he tried to foist on Christians.

First, since Ally now concedes that Islam does teach the necessity of atoning sacrifices for the obtainment of forgiveness, this means he is left with having to contend with the fact that, per his own logic, Allah doesn’t truly forgive anyone! In Ally’s own words, since his deity forgives Muslims because of the sacrificial deaths of animals “then it’s not really a forgiveness,” seeing that Allah basically gets “his blood anyway.”

Secondly, by admitting that Muslims perform an annual sacrifice to commemorate Abraham’s willingness to offer up his own son, Ally has further compounded his problems. The Quran expressly teaches that Allah ransomed Abraham’s son from being slaughtering by substituting him with a great sacrifice:

“We RANSOMED his son with a great sacrifice” S. 37:107 Muhammad Sarwar

But that’s not all. The sound ahadith proclaim that Allah will rescue or ransom Muslims from being punished in hell by torturing Jews and Christians for all the sins that they have committed:

Superiority of the believers in the Oneness of Allah and the punishment of the Jews and Christians

8) Narrated Abu Musa: Allah’s Messenger said: On the Day of Resurrection, my Ummah (nation) will be gathered into three groups. One sort will enter Paradise without rendering an account (of their deeds). Another sort will be reckoned an easy account and admitted into Paradise. Yet another sort will come bearing on their backs heaps of sins like great mountains. Allah will ask the angels though He knows best about them: Who are these people? They will reply: They are humble slaves of yours. He will say: UNLOAD the sins from them AND PUT THE SAME OVER the Jews and Christians: then let the humble slaves get into Paradise by virtue of My Mercy.

(This Hadith IS SOUND and mentioned in Mustadrak of Hakim). (110 Hadith Qudsi (Sacred Hadith), translated by Syed Masood-ul-Hasan, revision and commentaries by Ibrahim m. Kunna [Darussalam Publishers and Distributors], pp. 19-20; capital and underline emphasis ours)


  1. Abu Musa al-Ash’ari reported that the Messenger of Allah said, “On the Day of Rising, Allah will hand over a Jew or a Christian to every Muslim and say, ‘HERE IS YOUR REDEMPTION FROM THE FIRE.” [Muslim]

In another variant from him is that the Prophet said, “Some of the Muslims will be brought on the Day of Rising WITH SINS THE SIZE OF MOUNTAINS and Allah will forgive them.” (Al-Imam Abu Zakariya Yahya bin Sharaf An-Nawawi Ad-Dimashqi, Riyad as-Salihin (The Meadows of the Righteous), 51. Chapter: On Hope; bold and capital emphasis ours)

Here is one from the hadith collection of Imam Muslim:

(20) CHAPTER. Disbelievers are sent to Hell as SACRIFICE to the Muslims

  1. Abu Musa narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: “When it is the Day of Resurrection, Allah will deliver every Muslim a Jew or Christian and say: ‘THAT IS YOUR SACRIFICE FROM HELL-FIRE.’” (The Translation of the Meanings of Summarized Sahih Muslim (Arabic–English), Compiled by Al-Hafiz Zakiuddin Abdul-Azim Al-Mundhiri [Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, First Edition: February 2000], Volume 2, 62– The Book Of Repentance And Allah’s Great Mercy, pp. 1033-1034; bold and capital emphasis ours)

However, this now leads us to ask Ally to answer his very own questions and challenges, which he leveled against the Biblical teaching that Christ ransomed or redeemed us from our sins. Who does Allah pay the ransom to? Does he pay it to the devil? Or does he pay it to the king and wardens of hell?

The sinners will be in the Punishment of Hell, to dwell therein (for aye): Nowise will the (Punishment) be lightened for them, and in despair will they be there overwhelmed. Nowise shall We be unjust to them: but it is they who have been unjust themselves. They will cry: “O Malik! would that thy Lord put an end to us!” He will say, “Nay, but ye shall abide!” S. 43:74-77 A. Yusuf Ali

Soon will I cast him into Hell-Fire! And what will explain to thee what Hell-Fire is? Naught doth it permit to endure, and naught doth it leave alone! – Darkening and changing the colour of man! Over it are Nineteen. And We have set none but angels as Guardians of the Fire; and We have fixed their number only as a trial for Unbelievers, – in order that the People of the Book may arrive at certainty, and the Believers may increase in Faith, – and that no doubts may be left for the People of the Book and the Believers, and that those in whose hearts is a disease and the Unbelievers may say, “What symbol doth God intend by this?” Thus doth God leave to stray whom He pleaseth, and guide whom He pleaseth: and none can know the forces of thy Lord, except He and this is no other than a warning to mankind. S. 74:26-31 Y. Ali

If so, then this places the devil and/or Malik and the guardians of hell on equal bargaining terms with Allah, so that Allah was/is required to give a tremendous sacrifice to Satan and/or the keepers of hellfire, as well as having to hand the Jews and Christians over to him/them, in order to buy back the Muslims.

Or is Allah actually paying the ransom to himself? If so then this brings us back to the initial problem that Ally raised, namely, that Allah needs his pint of blood in order to forgive sins, which is no forgiveness whatsoever. Either way, Ally is faced with insurmountable problems!

For more on this topic of Allah requiring sacrifices in order to forgive, and the issue of him having to pay a ransom, we recommend the following rebuttals:

A Good Question: Whom Exactly Does Allah Pay The Ransom to? [Part 1], [Part 2]

The Problems with the Islamic Doctrine of Atonement [Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3], [Part 4]

With the foregoing in perspective we ready to move on to the second part in our series.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Switzerland: Imam charged with incitement to murder non-practicing Muslims, a post from with comments

Of course he would have taught that non-practicing Muslims should be killed. Muhammad is depicted in a hadith as saying: “Certainly I decided to order the Mu’adh-dhin (call-maker) to pronounce Iqama and order a man to lead the prayer and then take a fire flame to burn all those who had not left their houses so far for the prayer along with their houses.” (Bukhari 1.11.626)

“Winterthur imam charged with incitement to murder,” The Local, August 11, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

An Ethiopian imam of the now closed An’Nur mosque in Winterthur has been charged with inciting people to commit murder.

The Winterthur public prosecutor’s office said in a statement on Friday that the imam was charged on August 2nd with inciting the murder of non-practising Muslims.

He is also accused of having posted violent images of murders on Facebook and giving them to other people….

The public prosecutor is demanding a suspended prison sentence and the man’s expulsion from Switzerland with a 15-year ban on returning.

The imam has been under investigation since early November 2016 when police raided the An’Nur mosque after receiving evidence about a sermon given by the imam in which he called for the murder of Muslims who refused to take part in common prayer….

In February police arrested ten other people in connection with a brutal attack on two Muslims who are thought to have tipped off a journalist about the controversial sermon.

The An’Nur mosque closed its doors in late June after the landlord of the building refused to extend the rental contract.

The mosque was a controversial presence in the northern Swiss city over allegations that it had connections to terror groups and supported the radicalization of young people.

The mosque denied the accusations.

Tillerson’s State Department hosts Hamas-linked CAIR, radical Islamic groups
German attempt to sensitize Muslim migrants to Jew-hatred goes awry: “Arabs think what Hitler did was a good thing”
    1. gravenimage says

      August 11, 2017 at 8:54 pm

      Switzerland: Imam charged with incitement to murder non-practicing Muslims

      Orthodox Islam.

      At least in Switzerland he has been charged and the Mosque was closed.

        • abad says

          August 11, 2017 at 10:28 pm

          And that is exactly what we should be doing in the United States: shutting down mosques if their imams or any members incite murder.

    1. PRCS says

      August 11, 2017 at 9:34 pm

      “The mosque was a controversial presence in the northern Swiss city over allegations that it had connections to terror groups and supported the radicalization of young people.”

      Could the article’s author or the paper’s editor avtually define “radicalization” as it pertains to Islam and Muslims?

  1. Saleem Smith says

    August 11, 2017 at 9:53 pm

    The followers of Muhammad tend to follow Muhammad’s example. In fact the supposedly perfect Qur’an instructs Muslims to follow Muhammad’s example. Unfortunately for humanity Moe was a pedophile and a rapist and a psychotic cult leader.

    We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Mohammedanism is a lie.

    033:021: “There has certainly been for you in the Messenger of Allah an excellent pattern for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the Last Day and [who] remembers Allah often.”

    Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

    “One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…

    The statement continues,

    Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

One Muhammadan’s War against Allah and His “Messenger” Pt. 1 By Sam Shamoun

Here begins a series of articles where I will be citing from Shabir Ally’s debates and lectures, primarily from his recent exchanges with Christian apologist and philosopher David Wood, in order to show how Ally makes statements and claims which end up condemning Muhammad as a false prophet. As a result of his blatant inconsistencies and uncritical thinking (at times), Ally says things that prove quite damaging to the credibility of Muhammad and which even call into question his moral integrity.

As an example of such damage, in one of his debates with Wood I had called in challenging Ally to address the fact that his prophet condoned temporary marriages called muta, marriages done for the sole purpose of gratifying the sexual lusts of Muslim men. What makes these so-called marriages so shameful is that the Muslim men knowingly marry women for a short designated time which both parties agree to, and for a sum of money or some other form of compensation that the men are required to give for the sexual services provided by these women. Such marriages are nothing more than prostitution, plain and simple.

A Muslim youtuber has done us all a favor by actually taking my brief exchange with Ally and turning into a short clip for all to see and hear (Is Muta (Temporary Marriage) allowed in Islam?).

I had mentioned the criteria that the Lord Jesus gave in Matthew 7:15-20, a text which Ally himself alluded to in defense of Muhammad’s prophetic claims, where the Lord stated that a false prophet will be known by the rotten and evil fruits he produces. I then mentioned certain narrations from Sahih al-Bukhari concerning this issue of muta, citing them as an example of a very rotten and reprehensible fruit which calls into question Muhammad’s prophethood, and asked Ally how he could justify such a gross distortion and perversion of marriage, which in reality is nothing more than prostitution.

Here is what I was referring to:

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah and Salama bin Al-Akwa’: While we were in an army, Allah’s Apostle came to us and said, “You have been allowed to do the Mut’a (marriage), so do it.” Salama bin Al-Akwa’ said: Allah’s Apostle’s said, “If a man and a woman agree (to marry temporarily), their marriage should last for three nights, and if they like to continue, they can do so; and if they want to separate, they can do so.” I do not know whether that was only for us or for all the people in general. Abu Abdullah (Al-Bukhari) said: ‘Ali made it clear that the Prophet said, “The Mut’a marriage has been cancelled (made unlawful).” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 52)

Narrated Abdullah: We used to participate in the holy battles led by Allah’s Apostle and we had nothing (no wives) with us. So we said, “Shall we get ourselves castrated?” He forbade us that and then allowed us to marry women with a temporary contract and recited to us: — ‘O you who believe! Make not unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you, but commit no transgression.’ (5.87) (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 13o)

Tragically, there were some instances in which women even got pregnant through such immoral unions:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Urwa ibn az-Zubayr that Khawla ibn Hakim came to Umar ibn al-Khattab and said, “Rabia ibn Umayya made a temporary marriage with a woman and she is pregnant by him.” Umar ibn al-Khattab went out in dismay dragging his cloak, saying, “This temporary marriage, had I come across it, I would have ordered stoning and done away with it!” (Malik’s Muwatta, Book 28, Number 28.18.42)

Ally started out his response by first calling into question the historical veracity of al-Bukhari’s reports, arguing that these may have been something which the hypocrites concocted and managed to dupe the Muslims into believing that they actually came from Muhammad himself!

To show you just how desperate and weak Ally’s explanation is, notice what Muslim scholars have stated concerning Al-Bukhari’s work and the stringent method he employed to insure the veracity of every report that made it into his collection.

It has been UNANIMOUSLY AGREED that Imam Bukhari’s work is the most authentic of all the other works in Hadith literature PUT TOGETHER. The authenticity of Al-Bukhari’s work is such that the religious learned scholars of Islam said concerning him: “The most authentic book after the Book of Allah (i.e., Al-Qur’an) is Sahih Al-Bukhari.”… Before he recorded each Hadith he would make ablution and offer two Rak’at prayer and supplicate his Lord (Allah). Many religious scholars of Islam tried to find fault in the great remarkable collection- Sahih Al-Bukhari, BUT WITHOUT SUCCESS. It is for this reason, they UNANIMOUSLY AGREED that the most authentic book after the Book of Allah IS Sahih Al-Bukhari. (Translation of the Meanings of Sahih al-Bukhari, Arabic-English, translated by Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Formerly Director, University Hospital, Islamic University, Al-Madina Al-Munawwara (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), [Dar-us-Salam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh-Saudi Arabia, July, 1997], Volume 1, pp. 18-19; bold and capital emphasis ours)

The following citations are taken from the Islamic Awareness team’s response to fellow Christian writer and apologist Andrew Vargo’s criticism of Imam al-Bukhari’s compilation:

* The two sahîh collections did not gather the totality of the authentic ahâdîth as proved by al-Bukhârî’s testimony: “I have not included in my book al-Jâmic but what is authentic, and I left out among the authentic for fear of [excessive] length.(Footnote 2)”

Footnote 2 says:

He [al-Bukhârî] meant that he did not mention all the turuq [parallel chains of transmission] for each and every hadîth.[1]

To reiterate this in elementary English for the neophyte, Imâm al-Bukhârî selected only a few authentic ahâdîth from his vast collection. However, he left out certain traditions, despite their authenticity, simply to avoid excessive length and repetition in his al-Jâmic (a discussion about which is given below). If anything, the privilege to make such a gesture is highly complimentary to the authenticity of the Islamic traditions. In another tradition, Imâm al-Bukhârî is also reported to have said:

He said, I heard as-Sacdânî say, I heard some of our companions say, Muhammad Ibn Ismâcîl said: I selected/published [the content of] this book – meaning the Sahih book – from about 600,000 hadîths/reports. Abû Sacd al-Mâlînî informed us that cAbdullâh Ibn cUdayy informed us: I heard al-Hasan Ibn al-Husayn al-Bukhârî say: “I have not included in my book al-Jâmic but what is authentic, and I left out among the authentic what I could not get hold of.[2]


Imâm al-Bukhârî’s collection of ahâdîth was maintained to be authentic on account of his authority, and it has been maintained as authentic EVER SINCE. The neophyte’s assertion, that Imâm al-Bukhârî regarded almost 99% of his own collection as spurious, is among the most rash and foolhardy statements ever dared by a Christian missionary. On the contrary, the 7,397 refers to the number of hadîths that Imâm al-Bukhârî chose to include in his al-Jâmic and left out many authentic narrations from his vast collection for the fear of excessive length.

…Regardless, we will quote the famous trial of Imâm al-Bukhârî to show how Maqlub[8] (changed, reversed) ahadîth can be identified with ease by a scholar of hadîth:

The famous trial of al-Bukhârî by the scholars of Baghdad provides a good example of a Maqlûb isnâd. The traditionists, in order to test their visitor, al-Bukhârî, appointed ten men, each with ten ahâdîth. Now, each hadîth (text) of these ten people was prefixed with the isnâd of another. Imâm al-Bukhârî listened to each of the ten men as they narrated their ahâdîth and denied the correctness of every hadîth. When they had finished narrating these ahâdîth, he addressed each person in turn and recounted to him each of his ahâdîth with its correct isnâd. This trial earned him great honour among the scholars of Baghdad.[9] (On The Nature Of Hadith Collections Of Imam Al-Bukhari & Muslim; bold, capital and underline emphasis ours)

The foregoing should make it abundantly clear that al-Bukhari would not include anything which he suspected was fraudulent or that didn’t meet his criteria for authenticity.(1) Therefore, since he did include these reports about Muhammad basically prostituting women under the guise of temporary marriage, this means that they all must have met al-Bukhari’s very strict specifications and that he was obviously fully convinced of their historical veracity.

So did Imam Muslim since he too included these narrations about temporary marriages:

Abdullah (b. Mas’ud) reported: We were on an expedition with Allah’s Messenger and we had no women with us. We said: Should we not have ourselves castrated? He (the Holy Prophet) forbade us to do so He then granted us permission that we should contract temporary marriage for a stipulated period giving her a garment, and ‘Abdullah then recited this verse: ‘Those who believe do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you, and do not transgress. Allah does not like trangressers” (al-Qur’an, v. 87). (Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3243)

Rabi’ b. Sabra reported that his father went on an expedition with Allah’s Messenger during the Victory of Mecca, and we stayed there for fifteen days (i. e. for thirteen full days and a day and a night), and Allah’s Messenger permitted us to contract temporary marriage with women. So I and another person of my tribe went out, and I was more handsome than he, whereas he was almost ugly. Each one of us had a cloak, My cloak was worn out, whereas the cloak of my cousin was quite new. As we reached the lower or the upper side of Mecca, we came across a young woman like a young smart long-necked she-camel. We said: Is it possible that one of us may contract temporary marriage with you? She said: What will you give me as a dower? Each one of us spread his cloak. She began to cast a glance on both the persons. My companion also looked at her when she was casting a glance at her side and he said: This cloak of his is worn out, whereas my cloak is quite new. She, however, said twice or thrice: There is no harm in (accepting) this cloak (the old one). So I contracted temporary marriage with her, and I did not come out (of this) until Allah’s Messenger declared it forbidden. (Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3253)

Sahih Muslim even includes a report which states that muta was still being observed all the way up until the time of Umar’s caliphate:

Ibn Uraij reported: ‘Ati’ reported that Jabir b. Abdullah came to perform ‘Umra, and we came to his abode, and the people asked him about different things, and then they made a mention of temporary marriage, whereupon he said: Yes, we had been benefiting ourselves by this temporary marriage during the lifetime of the Holy Prophet and during the time of Abu Bakr and ‘Umar. (Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3248)

Now what makes these hadiths from Sahih Muslim all the more interesting is that, not only has this collection been deemed as thoroughly reliable by the consensus of the greatest Muslim scholars that have ever lived, some of these very scholars have even gone as far as to argue that in some respects Sahih Muslim is actually superior to the hadith collection of Sahih al-Bukhari!

“… Although Sahih al-Bukhari is the most reliable collection of Ahadith, however, Sahih Muslim has certain aspects of superiority. Imam Muslim adhered strictly to most of the principles of the Science of Hadith which were somehow at some places ignored by his teacher Imam Bukhari. Imam Muslim accepted for his collection only such Ahadith which had been transmitted with an unbroken chain of reliable narrators, free from all defects and were in perfect harmony with the narrations of other narrators. He has recorded only those ahadith which were transmitted at least by two different transmitters from two different Companions. Imam Bukhari has sometimes used the Kunyah (surname) of the narrators and sometimes their names. Imam Muslim avoided this confusion. Imam Muslim is also particular in pointing out the slightest difference in the text of the narrations. Imam Bukhari has fragmented most of the Ahadith and presented the portions under different chapters, while Imam Muslim presented them as a whole narration. So, the works of both Imams provide different approaches for the scholars and readers of Ahadith.” (The Translation of the Meanings of Summarized Sahih Muslim, Publisher’s Note, Volume 1, p. ii; bold emphasis ours)


“Imam Muslim compiled many books and treatises on Hadith, the most important of his works is the compilation of the Hadith collection Al-Jami‘ As-Sahih, which is famous by the name of Sahih Muslim. Some scholars of Hadith opine that in some respects IT IS THE BEST AND MOST AUTHENTIC COLLECTION of Ahadith. Imam Muslim laboriously collected 300,000 Ahadith, but after critical study, he selected only 4,000 Ahadith for this collection…

“Many students learned the Science of Hadith from Imam Muslim. Those who became famous and occupied a prominent position are: Abu Hatim Razi, Musa bin Harun, Ahmad bin Salamah, Abu ‘Isa Tirmidhi, Abu Bakr bin Khuzaimah, Abu ‘Awanah and Hafiz Dhahbi.” (Ibid., p. v; bold and capital emphasis ours).

Note that these are the very sources that Ally has no qualms throwing under the bus whenever they prove too damaging for his position. This is precisely why I accused Ally of preaching Hislam, e.g., his version of Islam, as opposed to actual Islam, since he presents an Islam that doesn’t exist in reality and which isn’t anchored in its primary sources. Rather Ally’s HISlam only exists in his own wishful thinking.

Be that as it may, this now creates a major dilemma for Ally. Since these traditions are found in both collections of Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, this shows that they met the rather rigorous and stringent criteria of authenticity of both of these renowned hadith masters and compilers. To put this simply, both of these renowned hadith scholars were fully persuaded that these reports of Muhammad permitting temporary marriages actually go back to him. When we add to the fact that the traditions concerning temporary marriages are found in all the rest of the major hadith collections, i.e., Abu Dawud, Ibn Majah, Tirmidhi etc., then the problem becomes even more complicated for Ally since he is going to have to do a whole lot more than simply brush these narratives aside as questionable. Ally has no choice but to contend with the fact that according to the very strict methodology employed by the leading scholars on hadiths and their authenticity, these narrations concerning muta definitely go back to the historical Muhammad (that is, as far as Islamic historiography and hadith criticism are concerned).

However, this is the least of Ally’s problems. Ally went on to claim that Sunni Muslims have prohibited muta on the grounds of it being classified as adultery. Pay careful attention to what he said:

“When it comes to temporary marriage, the Sunni Muslim scholars say that this is not allowed and that it is akin to adultery and fornication, whereas the Shi’i scholars allow it. And the passages you cited, if you correctly cited them–I am not familiar with these–then this would reflect that view. And the fact that it is found in the Sunni book, does not mean that it cannot support an early view which later on Sunnis would not come to accept.”

Notice that the reason why Sunnis reject temporary marriage according to Ally is because, “IT IS AKIN TO ADULTERY AND FORNICATION”!

Ally has essentially accused both Muhammad and his followers of being a group of adulterers and fornicators, since the Sunni sources confirm that all of them were performing muta for years and years before it was made impermissible! Ally’s claim also means that Muhammad and his companions were all guilty of degrading women by treating them as prostitutes.

I am going to break this all down so the readers can see how Ally has basically accused his own prophet of being an adulterer and fornicator without even realizing it.

  1. Sunni Islam’s earliest and most reliable sources confirm that Muhammad sanctioned temporary marriage for a period of time.
  2. According to Ally, the reason why Sunni scholars have forbidden temporary marriage is because it is nothing more than adultery and fornication.
  3. Therefore, according to the position of these scholars whom Ally appealed to, Muhammad and his companions all stand condemned for committing adultery and fornication, since they all carried out temporary marriages for many years before someone decided to abrogate this reprehensible and immoral practice.
  4. This in turn means that Muhammad and his followers treated women as prostitutes since they paid certain women to marry them for a short period of time solely for sex. They had no intention of marrying them permanently.
  5. Ally’s response also turns Shi’a Muslims into a bunch of adulterers and fornicators since, as he himself admits, Shi’a Islam still permits temporary marriages.

Way to go Shabir!

Therefore, in his zeal to defend the indefensible Ally ended up condemning his own prophet as an adulterer and fornicator, and for treating women as prostitutes (albeit indirectly).

Lord willing, we will be posting more of Ally’s indirect assaults against his messenger in the near future.


(1) It needs to be emphasized that just because these narratives satisfied al-Bukhari’s criteria for authenticity doesn’t prove that this somehow makes it a genuine saying of Muhammad. It simply means that those who claim to be Sunni Muslims like Shabir must contend with the fact that these reports met al-Bukhari’s strict and rigorous standards of reliability and therefore cannot simply be dismissed and brushed aside. Furthermore, without these sources Muslims such as Shabir cannot make heads or tails out of much of the Quran since a great bulk of it is quite unintelligible. In fact, it is these same collections of traditions that inform Ally how to pray, fast, dress, perform the Hajj, the amount of alms one is to give etc., all of which he takes advantage of and acts upon. And yet whenever these same sources prove too damaging for his cause and call into question Muhammad’s prophethood, Ally will not hesitate to attack their reliability.

This merely exemplifies the circular nature of Ally’s approach, i.e., assuming that Muhammad was a true prophet and therefore wouldn’t utter such nonsense or engage in and/or permit/promote gross immorality. It also proves that Ally is not interested in the religion of Islam as has been historically understood and practiced by the greatest Muslim scholars of the past fourteen hundred years. Rather, Ally is more concerned about spreading the message of HISlam, e.g., his version of Islam which only exists in his own mind.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

London model Chloe Ayling was “kidnapped to order” by gang for Muslim men, a post from, with comments

The seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must (eventually) win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.

A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.

“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

In January 2016, a female al-Azhar professor stated that Allah allowed Muslims to rape non-Muslim women in order to humiliate them.

The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.

“London model Chloe Ayling was ‘kidnapped to order by gang for Middle Eastern men,’” by Rashid Razaq, Evening Standard, August 7, 2017 (thanks to the Geller Report):

A British model may have been “kidnapped to order” by an crime gang for Middle Eastern buyers, the woman’s lawyer claimed today.

Chloe Ayling, 20, was allegedly abducted in Milan and detained for six days while her captor tried to auction her online.

Italian police suspect she was drugged and transported in a bag to Borgial, an isolated village near Turin, before being released on July 17.

Ms Ayling arrived back at her home in Coulsdon, south London, yesterday and said she had been through a “terrifying experience.”

She said: “I feared for my life, second by second, minute by minute, hour by hour.”

oday Ms Ayling’s lawyer, Daria Pesce, told the Standard that the Black Death gang suspected of masterminding the kidnapping may have targeted her client because she was British.

Ms Pesce said: “The organisation has been kidnapping girls for Arabian buyers for years, Italian girls, girls of all nationalities. They may have wanted a British girl so that is why they kidnapped Chloe.”

Lukasz Herba, 30, a Polish national, who lives in Britain, has been arrested on suspicion of kidnap and extortion.

The UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) is assisting the Italian investigation and West Midlands Police officers raided an address linked to Herba in the Oldsbury area, seizing computer equipment.

Ms Ayling was allegedly abducted on July 11 by two men as she attended an arranged photo shoot.

It is claimed the men tried to sell Ms Ayling online on the Dark Web for more than $300,000 (£230,000) posting pictures of her and telling her she would be “fed to the tigers” after her buyers became bored of her.

However Ms Ayling says the gang members changed their minds when they found out she has a two-year-old son….

Malaysia: Government school has “Muslim” and “non-Muslim” drinking cups
UK Muslim rape gang: “All white women are good for one thing, for men like me to f*** and use as trash”


                • bob says

                  August 10, 2017 at 12:18 pm

                  A Pole kidnapped her for the Islamic slave market. In centuries past Vikings raided the coast for sale to the Islamic slave market just as Africans raided other Africans to sell slaves to Catholics who disobeyed the Papal Bull against slavery.. Unlike Catholicism, there was no Islamic teaching against slavery.

        • Dave says

          August 10, 2017 at 11:20 am

          The Left/liberal Loons even allow their women/Girls to be assaulted, molested, gang raped , murdered

          ..and its all Halal (approved) as per allah ! So police do not even register case and mock the victims.

    1. Robert says

      August 10, 2017 at 10:10 am

      Check your links. They are broken.

      I tried to source two of your extended quotes by Islamic cleric, and was sent instead to commercial websites, that had nothing to do with the Islamic jurisprudence quote on sex-slavery.

      I need the sources, so I can speak with certainty that these are legit quotes from top Islamic scholars of the Quran and Islamic law.

        • Jay Boo says

          August 11, 2017 at 2:05 am

          Not all Muslims are doing this.
          But all Muslims should be ashamed of Islam’s stomach turning filth.

          Sadly, They are not.

    1. mortimer says

      August 10, 2017 at 10:29 am

      The genocidal rape of MARRIED CAPTIVES is DECREED by Allah in Koran 4.23-24. This is a crime against humanity according to UN Security Council Resolution 1820.

      The Koran AUTHORIZES CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY… genocidal rape is NORMATIVE Islam, rather than an aberration.

      Mullahs authorized the GENOCIDAL RAPE of 400,000 Bengali women in the 1971 invasion of East Pakistan by the Pakistani Army. GENOCIDAL RAPE is Islamic.

    1. Andrew Swallow says

      August 10, 2017 at 11:09 am

      The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

      If to take slaves they Muslims have to be at war have they just confessed to being at war with people of the country? That makes them enemy aliens and covered by the laws of war.

    1. Walter Sieruk says

      August 10, 2017 at 12:02 pm

      Those vile Muslim brutes with their wicked gang violence and kidnapping. of that young women are awful.. Gangs of heinous hooligans are described in the Bible. Which reads “”For they do not sleep unless they have done evil; and their sleep is taken away unless they make someone fall. For they eat the bread of wickedness,and drink the wine of violence. Proverbs 4:16,17. [N.K.J.V.] Those hideous Muslim villains by did that evil action and Islamic crime against this girl will on Judgment Day have to answer to the God of the Bible for their cruel savage Islamic crime against this person., Romans 14:12.

    1. Walter Sieruk says

      August 10, 2017 at 12:12 pm

      Those lawless Muslim brutes with their kidnapping of this young woman and their other vile violence , they aren’t really going to get away with their evil behavior. For it has been truly sad “What goes around comes around.” In other words, their wicked actions will come back on them in the end It should be added that It will come back on them hard . The reason that we all may know that the above saying is true is because it’s upheld in the Bible. For in the Bible it is written “For whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.” Galatians 6:7. [N.K.J.V.]

    1. Walter Sieruk says

      August 10, 2017 at 12:14 pm

      Some Muslims males are, literally, slaving holders and slave traders. Those who engage in this despicable unconscionable heartless, trade are commanded in the Bible Exodus 21:16. First Timothy 1:10. There are some decent but naive people who on finding out about this would be shocked in horror and then stop and wonder and ask “How can those Jihadist/Muslims of ISIS who engage in this heinous affront be so extremely hideous, vicious, unfeeling as to kidnap girls to hold or sell as slaves?” The answer to this question is found in the Bible. For the Bible teaches that there are some men who are, so very, cold, callous and dangerous because they have had “their conscience seared with a hot iron.” First Timothy 4:2. [K.J.V.]
      The “hot iron” in this case is Islam.

    1. Jack Diamond says

      August 10, 2017 at 12:37 pm

      If her story is truthful, she needs to fire her agent (or have him investigated). He booked both these “shoots” with this so-called photographer, once in Paris then again in Milan, whom neither properly investigated, not to mention she went to this sketchy location entirely unaccompanied.

      That there might have been buyers for her in the Middle East is plausible (she goes to Dubai for photoshoots) but the details of the attempt to sell her on the “dark web” or the sudden humanitarianism when they “discovered” she had a child and released her, doesn’t quite add up. Does it? A group ready to “feed her to the tigers” rather than be discovered? But one hopes this wanna-be white slave procurer will lead authorities to bigger fish (Gulf Arabs excepted, of course).

    1. Troybeam says

      August 10, 2017 at 12:37 pm

      Drugged and kidnapped, let’s see little Maddy or Natalie in Aruba…no bodies but hey not really that hard to smuggle a person away on a boat to another nation. just say’in could it be Islamic wondering eyes with the need to possess white females for a harem or slave trade.

    1. RationalVoice says

      August 10, 2017 at 12:40 pm

      We must treat Islam and Muslims as we find them and it would seem they are behaving as they always have back like in the 17th century when the Moors even captured a whole village in southern Ireland enslaving,raping and killing them as their “holy” book instructed.The media have been reporting the conviction of “Asian” men in Newcastle for enslaving and sexually abusing young, vulnerable white girls.
      Almost every town in England is affected by this disgusting evil menace which has been perpetrated by Pakistani Muslims since at least the 1970s when I witnessed a work colleague making efforts to do the same.I reported it to his boss who was also my boss who said he didn’t care as he done his day job okay.My boss was a “spiritualist” i.e. another religious nutter! so I couldn’t expect better from him
      On the BBC morning news they were described as “Asian Men in Newcastle”.The interviewer interrupted and said “You mean Muslims,you are just being PC aren’t you”.Even Theresa May has in the past said we must stop being politically correct.But as we all know she “talks the talk ” but fails to “walk the walk”.
      Other more civilized Asians like the Chinese should complain about this blanket term
      Well we can expect more of the same until this religion is banned and no more mosques built or Muslims let in or their behaviour tolerated anywhere in Europe.

        • Spike1047 says

          August 10, 2017 at 6:49 pm

          On a more general note it seems we are accepting things that a few years ago we would never have accepted. We now accept that ‘slavery’ is rampant in England and Europe. Twenty years ago we thought it was part of history. These lone-wolf attacks will soon not be on page one but buried on page 16; or not reported at all. What will happen to these muslim animals who have raped and abused hundreds and thousands of vulnerable girls? They will all be out in 5 or 6 years and allowed to continue. We are losing our society. It was never perfect but it was ours. In 10 or 20 years time I wont be here but my children and grandchildren will have to live as best they can in a society which will not look anything like the society I grew up in.

    1. Jac says

      August 10, 2017 at 1:26 pm

      Good thing she didn’t succumb to “Stockholm Syndrome” like Stephen McGown, kidnapped by Al-Quaeda and recently released after six years in captivity. He stated…

      ‘I see a lot of good in Islam. It has opened my eyes. It’s taken me away from capitalism.’
      ‘Before the desert, I was a Christian. I entered (Islam) of my own accord.’

      Really?? Name ONE good thing about this death cult, just ONE!

        • Paul N Silas says

          August 10, 2017 at 2:30 pm

          You get to wear your old bed sheets as clothes? You can move to Minnesota and live on welfare? (sarcasm)

        • Jack Diamond says

          August 10, 2017 at 3:13 pm

          McGown also apparently was asked whether he would return to Christianity–he needed to read more, he said, but he added: “I see many good things in Islam. It requires a very good character, a very strict character.” That apostasy thing he hasn’t got to yet. But maybe he has a thing for getting whipped.

          His fellow prisoner, the Swede Gustaffson also converted to Islam, but not because he suddenly believed in it. “That was the only thing I could think of that would buy me some time, even though I did not have much hope that it would work.” He never lost sight of their captors as the enemy, he said, even while eating and praying alongside them.

          A third captive, the Dutchman Sjaak Rijke, was rescued in a raid by the French military in 2015. I don’t think he converted. It also should be mentioned that when Al Qaeda stormed the hotel in Timbuktu and took the men hostages (and they eventually got paid ransom money) a German national was killed by them when he resisted. The one who tried to fight back and died for it deserves to be remembered here more than the one who decided ‘if you can’t beat em join em’. I cannot even find his name mentioned anywhere.

    1. Manny says

      August 10, 2017 at 1:51 pm

      What gets me is these filthy desert scum drool over western women while they keep their women covered up and ugly. No wonder they desire western women. So they lust over outsiders while they maintain families with their fellow Muslims. As long as they have money they will buy what they lust after. They should be left with their sheep and goats.

    1. 762x51FMJ says

      August 10, 2017 at 3:43 pm

      Islam apologists claim they released her because she had a small child and they caired.

      But as an infidel and a mother, she was not the promised virgin and worth nothing to the Muslim perverts.

    1. Baucent says

      August 10, 2017 at 8:45 pm

      It’s possible they were looking for a Middle East buyer but other reports suggest Romanian gangsters involved as well.

    1. gravenimage says

      August 10, 2017 at 9:42 pm

      London model Chloe Ayling was “kidnapped to order” by gang for Muslim men

      Yes–when I first heard about this awful story there was a brief mention that the kidnappers intended to sell her “in the Middle East”–this obviously meant to Muslims.

      There is a long and horrific history of Muslims pirating ships or raiding the coasts for European women to be sold to the harems and slave markets of Dar-al-Islam. I think we had all hoped this was a thing of the distant past.

      There are also stories about young European women disappearing after having answered ads for “party guests” in places like Saudi Arabia.


      However Ms Ayling says the gang members changed their minds when they found out she has a two-year-old son….

      If the kidnappers themselves had been Muslim, would they have had even this degree of humanity?

        • Baucent says

          August 11, 2017 at 2:25 am

          You might recall a year ago a defecting ISIS jihadi told how they were told by superiors they could only buy one Yazidi girl but visiting Saudi sponsors ( financial backers of IS) could buy four. How many of the world’s missing young women have ended up in slavery in Saudi Arabia?

    1. Guest says

      August 10, 2017 at 11:33 pm

      “the gang members changed their minds when they found out she has a two-year-old son….” That seems to good to be true to me.

    1. Flavius Claudius Iulianus says

      August 11, 2017 at 12:04 am

      “The organisation has been kidnapping girls for Arabian buyers for years, Italian girls, girls of all nationalities.”

      Up until 1963 slavery was legal in Saudi Arabia. Under pressure from the West (you can’t really take political donations from a slave trader nation, can you?) it made slavery illegal. Now the authorities turn a blind eye.

      Religion of peace? One thing’s for sure, Mohammadism is the religion of slavery and slave trading.

    1. ItsReallyQuiteClear says

      August 11, 2017 at 12:41 am

      The minimum penalty for committing rape in the name of a religion should be mandatory castration: no exceptions, no appeals. If someone believes that they have a religious directive to rape another human being, then by definition, they view this alleged religious duty as being above any state law. There is no other penalty, other than the death penalty, that could be expected to stop them from doing it again (especially with insultingly light sentences).

      Castration might also be offered, on a voluntary basis, for individuals who feel that they are unable to control their urges if they are in any way exposed to “Allah-given ‘delicacies.’” To further paraphrase Ishaq Akintola, that sick bastard in Lagos, even if a letter is sent you will be unable to reply if your “typewriter” has been removed.

      Related article:

  1. Omi-san says

    August 11, 2017 at 12:41 pm

    That kidnapping story seems fake as hell. We are supposed to believe the gang released her because she is a mother and under the promise that she wouldn’t denounce them?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Ugly Truth About Christian Genocide | Ezra Levant and Stefan Molyneux

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Local Council caves in to islamic terror tactics and forbids construction of new synagogue in accordance with anti-semitic laws of Sharia

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment