Christian Prince – Return of Isa in Islam

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Christian Prince – Return of Isa in Islam

  1. Faiz says:

    Is this same Christian princess who claimed that Muslims are allowed to commit bestiality? If so, I think that is enough to discredit this fool and liar.

    It’s no wonder that madman is so insane and astray. Birds of a feather flock together!

  2. madmanna says:

    Watch the video if you dare allow yourself to be humiliated. The guy knows Arabic. He makes a fool out of the Muslim teacher that’s for sure.

  3. θ says:

    The return of Isa is a story of a “less success”.
    Actually Qur’an doesn’t want to humiliate Jesus, but it finds its way in Hadith nonetheless. It is behooved for the Christ to return again – for proving himself with a second chance – before the Judgment Day on purpose to try once more time leading the misguided Ahl Kitabs because Jesus is so far counted as the “most less successful Prophet” of all history, particularly from a perspective of Monotheism.
    It is possible that he may not be able to enter 7th Heaven – despite staying at the 3rd Heaven – if he shall not have amended his bad blunder.
    The successful Prophets such as Jonah, Moses, David, especially Prophet Muhammad never leave a religious baggage of polytheism behind. Solomon may leave a jot of heathenism as his legacy but that is not rampant.

  4. θ says:

    Christians should have been ashamed so much when believing in the Second Coming of Jesus. The return of Jesus is his personal effort to amend his humiliation, as he says concerning his aborted work:
    Lk 14
    28 For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it? 29 Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him, 30 Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish.

  5. θ says:

    Next time, when the Christian apologists pray for the quick coming of Jesus, just tell them or remind them with a mockery in Luke 14:30 “This man began to build, and was not able to finish”.

  6. Faiz says:

    LOL, madman. It sounds like you are trying to get some revenge for your many humiliations!

    Right off the bat, Christian princess makes the “Muslims are pagans” claim. This seems to be a common sickness in you Christian crackpots. You idolatrous pagans worship a man, and believe that God can be satiated by a human sacrifice. What is more pagan than that?!

    Muslims don’t worship the black stone you idiots. This laughable myth is as silly as the “moon-god” myth.

    Jesus (pbuh) will not come as a “new” prophet. He will come as a follower of Muhammad (pbuh). He is referred to as a “sign of the Hour” in the Quran, which can only refer to his return.

    Christian princess claims that since Muslims rely on both the Quran and the Ahadith, it is somehow a “contradiction”. Um no, Christian princess. Muhammad (pbuh) came to deliver the Quran to mankind but also to explain it. That is why the Ahadith are also necessary. They explain the Quran to us. And in the Ahadith, it is clearly written that Jesus (pbuh) will return.

    The laughable ignorance of christian princess can be seen in his ludicrous claim that there are 40 “holy” ahadith. What does he mean by “holy”? if he means the “hadith qudsi”, then he has just exposed his utter ignorance and proof that he is discredited liar. There are far more than just “40” hadith qudsi. Here is a link mentioning 110 hadith qudsi by itself:

    Now, if you want a real contradiction, you need not go further than the fact that the Tanakh says nothing about the second coming of the Messiah. This is a problem for Christians, not Muslims.

    Regarding his rants about the ahadith, such as Satan farting, I have refuted other Christians on this matter elsewhere and exposed their hypocrisy regarding the fact that angels had sex with humans (according to Genesis). See here:

    Regarding the princess’ mistranslation of Surah Al-Imran 3:144, let us see multiple translations from REAL scholars, including non-Muslim ones:

    “Muhammad is not but a messenger. [Other] messengers have passed on before him. So if he was to die or be killed, would you turn back on your heels [to unbelief]? And he who turns back on his heels will never harm Allah at all; but Allah will reward the grateful.” (Saheeh International)

    “Muhammad is naught but a Messenger; Messengers have passed away before him. Why, if he should die or is slain, will you turn about on your heels? If any man should turn about on his heels, he will not harm God in any way; and God will recompense the thankful.” (A.J. Arberry)

    “Muhammad is only a Messenger and he has been preceded by other Messengers. If he were to die or be killed, would you turn on your heels? Those who turn on their heels do not harm Allah in any way. Allah will recompense the thankful” (Aisha Bewley)

    “Mohammed is but an apostle; apostles have passed away before his time; what if he die or is killed, will ye retreat upon your heels? He who retreats upon his heels does no harm to God at all; but God will recompense the thankful” (E.H. Palmer)

    “Mohammed is no more than an apostle; the other apostles have already deceased before him: If he die therefore, or be slain, will ye turn back on your heels? But he who turneth back on his heels, will not hurt God at all; and God will surely reward the thankful” (George Sale)

    “Muhammad is no more than an apostle; other apostles have already passed away before him: if he die, therefore, or be slain, will ye turn upon your heels? But he who turneth on his heels shall not injure God at all: And God will certainly reward the thankful!” (J.M. Rodwell)

    We can see nothing in there about “all” messengers. The princess lied!

    This should be enough to refute and discredit this pathetic ignoramus. Christian princess is just another wannabe scholar. It is SO easy to refute this pathetic worm. His poor groupie madman now has to find another wannabe scholar to fawn over. LOL!!

    If I have time later, I will refute the rest of the video as well, inshaAllah.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.