Islamic Ethics for Dummies, short and sweet

The Golden Rule is the rule of ethics for Muslim to Muslim. You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. Don’t tread on my toes and I won’t tread on yours.

Muslim to non-Muslim is slightly more complicated but also simple. No need for abrogation. Nothing is abrogated in the Koran because Islam works with what I call an opportunistic and situational ethic where every Muslim can decide for himself how it is best to treat the filthy kuffar as the situation presents itself, as long the aim is to benefit the Ummah. This good intention is the only thing that must be common to all actions. Two options are open to the Muslim in each situation in which he has interaction with the non-Muslim. One is what I would call the Lovey-Dovey option and the other is what I would call the harsh and nasty Let’s Play Jihad Today option:

The only snag, if you can call it that, is that there are two important differences between these two options; namely one is mandatory and rewarded and the other is not mandatory and not rewarded. The non mandatory and unrewarded option is the Lovey Dovey Option. This is the option that Allah is not so enthused about and barely tolerates, but he deems it to be sometimes necessary and useful. The second, and mandatory, “option”, Let’s Play Jihad Today, is both rewarded and also mutually exclusive and diametrically opposed to the first. This is the option that Allah prefers because he has attached great rewards to it and punishments to those who fail to comply.

It wouldn’t be Islam if there was no contradiction involved. One of the ways to win a war is to confuse and divide the enemy. One of the ways that Islam tricks the enemy is to put verses in the Koran that are lovey-dovey next to those that command Muslims to slit the throats of the Kuffar. This is like the dance of the weasel before it kills the rabbit. The rabbit is duly mesmerized by this dance of death in which it can discern no danger. This is basically what happens at interfaith gatherings and dawah events of all kinds. The weasel is dancing around the rabbit.

That’s it in a nutshell.

The verse that is optional and unrewarded by Allah is 60 v 8:

8 Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes – from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly.

The mandatory verses are all the violent jihad fighting verses to which reward and punishment are attached; this is just a small sample:

(4) And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers)

(سورة البقرة, Al-Baqara, Chapter #2, Verse #193)
Arabic, Transliteration, Urdu (Ahmed Ali) , Urdu (Jalandhry) , Yusuf Ali, Shakir, Picthal, Mohsin Khan, French, Spanish, Indonesian, Malay, German, Bosnian, Russian, Tafsir – Jalal ad-Din, Tafsir – King Fahad Quran Complex)

(5) Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know. 

So it is wise as kuffar to know what options we are giving to Muslims by our behavior.  We decide what options are open to them. They just choose from the options that Allah has given to them. If we make ourselves vunerable Sharia is heavily biased in favour of a violent response against us to allow Allah to vent his wrath upon us and punish us for being inveterate unbelievers. Lovey Dovey does not advance the political interests of the Ummah and it doesn’t display the wrath and superiority of Allah over other gods and civilizations. Bad luck for us. Stay safe.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Islamic Ethics for Dummies, short and sweet

  1. Faiz says:

    Oh it just keeps getting worse and worse for poor little madman. All this guy can do is make rant after rant about Islam and the big, bad Muslim under the bed. It’s hilarious!!

    Madman, why don’t you explain to us why your Bible allows rape of female captives?
    Why does your Bible call for the genocide of Canaanites? Why does your Bible call for the killing of children and babies?

    Your ignorant rants on Jihad have been soundly refuted elsewhere. Repeating the same nonsense only humiliates you further and exposes your dishonest tactics.

  2. Faiz says:

    It is the habit of the bigot to demonize the “other” and instill fear in the unsuspecting masses of an alleged hidden threat that is about to wipe them out. This is madman’s modus operandi in a nutshell. You need to see a psychiatrist, madman. I’m worried about your mental state of health.

  3. θ says:

    “Madmanna says: (5) Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know. ”

    Ordination has the limits and terms.
    First, it is interesting that even though the Makkah city was finally conquered, yet Qur’an in Q.9, v.120 just enjoined the particular Madinah’s Moslems and the Bedouins to go forth for other battle accompanying Prophet Muhammad (such as major enforcement of Hunayn and Tabouk).
    It is important to note that Qur’an doesn’t specifically enlist the people of Makkah city or Taif or somewhere else to go the war.

    Next, the Combative Jihad is exempted from various Moslem groups. It is not enjoined for Moslems to go war all.

    Also, Not all Moslem is Islamic.
    The Khawarijis divided, targeted and harmed Moslems instead. They recruited the ignorant Moslems on purpose to be their dumb “human shields” in wars, even worse as a dumber one to carry out a suicide mission.

  4. θ says:

    To the ear of the West and Right-wing groups alike, the word “Shari’ah” should be understood as “Religious Freedom for practicing Islam”, it is Islamic ethics, preceding Hudud (Penal Code), Caliph and Combative Jihad. Such a Shari’ist is a freedom bearer.

    There’s a clear difference between Moslem who practice Islam and Mohametan who practice a cultism. For Moslems our Prophet Muhammad is the epitome of Allah’s mercy for the righteous civilisation. For Mohametans, the last years of Prophet Muhammad’s warfare is the real Prophet correcting all his previous years of tolerance.

  5. θ says:

    Those clerics who adhere to the “Abrogating Theory” in Sunnah would contradict their belief with Prophet Muhammad’s title Uswa Hasana (Best Role Model). The Abrogating Theory depicts Prophet Muhammad in a faulty fallible character as the self-correcting one. If the last years of Prophet Muhammad’s warfare is the real Prophet correcting all his previous years of tolerance, it means only his last years can be Role Model. In fact, Allah honors the personal life of Prophet Muhammad completely as a whole, not just for his warfare life.

  6. θ says:

    Not only the ignorant Non-Moslems and Islamophobes, even the clerics need to be educated properly by Moslems on how to not disrespect the life of Prophet Muhammad. Clerics tend to fall into a cultism of Mohametan thru their invention of Abrogating Theory in Sunnah. In such a cultism, they believe that Prophet Muhammad has been so wrong in 13 years of tolerance and compromising strategy and he corrected his mistakes for the next 6 years.

    Clerics tend to hide the fact that actually the Hudaybiyya Treaty (6 years after migration) which is once again a compromising strategy, as well as the amnesty on Makkahs. If Prophet Muhammad had followed Sa’d’s decision of the Banu Qurayza absed on the Torah, those Makkah adults should have been beheaded in the Makkah’s market.

  7. θ says:

    In a nutshell, the clerics can’t believe in Prophet Muhammad being a perfect human if they believe in his self-correction of the previous mistakes. A perfection doesn’t have error, let alone correction.

  8. θ says:

    Abrogation Theory is falsely attributed to one Prophet’s companion Ibn Abbas with the so-called Sword Verse Q.9, v.5 (but there’s no word “Sword” therein) as the main theme. In fact, if the Sword Verse were literal, the surrendering Makkah’s adults should have got beheaded one-by-one just as the Jewish adults of Banu Qurayza had experienced in Madinah’s corner.
    At leas, some surrendering leaders of Makkah should have been killed with a hot iron, and their women should have become the sex slaves. In fact, they just got a freedom and amnesty.

  9. θ says:

    The Arabic title of Qur’an’s 9th Surah “Baraah” could possibly be translated as Independence or Freedom.

  10. Anonymous says:

    It is still a mystery why a few people turn so quickly to radical path by simply watching the ISIS videos. Is the online mind control or brainwashing program a real thing or a fake news?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.