Europe needs a Second Amendment

Video: Club-wielding migrants attacking French citizen. Luckily for him, he was a plainclothes police officer, and therefore armed.

Europeans should be allowed to carry weapons to defend themselves.

After the horrible jihad attack in Paris on November 13, 2015, in which more than a hundred people were killed, Donald J. Trump – the future president of the USA – said:

“You can say what you want, but our people had guns, if they were allowed to carry it would’ve been a much, much different situation.”

And of course, Trump was right. To bloodthirsty jihadis, Europe is a heavenly slaughterhouse full of unarmed infidels. At the music club Bataclan in Paris, people had to watch their friends and partners suffer unspeakable horrors. The jihadis tortured people with knives, men and women had their genitals stabbed, and some victims had their bellies cut open and their intestines pulled out before they were executed. The unarmed citizens were powerless against the jihadis.

During the jihad attack on the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi in 2013, the jihadis “removed balls, eyes, ears, nose. They get your hand and sharpen it like a pencil then they tell you to write your name with the blood. They drive knives inside a child’s body.” Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble warned after the attack:

“Societies have to think about how they’re going to approach the problem. One is to say we want an armed citizenry; you can see the reason for that.”

Armed citizens in Europe?

Here is what the head of the Swiss army, Lieutenant-General André Blattmann, thinks:

“The threat of terror is rising, hybrid wars are being fought around the globe … migration flows of displaced persons and refugees have assumed unforeseen dimensions,” Blattmann says as he advises people to arm themselves: “those not already armed as part of the Swiss Army reserve [should] take steps to arm themselves.”

After a string of terror attacks during the summer of 2016, Czech president Miloš Zeman said:

“I really think that citizens should arm themselves against terrorists. And I honestly admit that I changed my mind, because previously I was against [citizens] having too many weapons. After these attacks, I don’t think so [anymore]”.

Zeman points to Israel’s gun laws as an example. Being surrounded by Islamic countries and being Jewish, Israel has more experience with fighting Islamic terrorism than any other country. One successful lifesaving strategy is to allow trained citizens to carry firearms. For this reason, terror attacks are regularly stopped by civilians before too many innocents are hurt. Compared with Denmark, which has some of the toughest laws on weapons (you are not even allowed to own a pepper spray), Israel has three times fewer deadly accidents with firearms. And three times fewer gun related deaths than France, Finland and Austria – all countries where civilians are not allowed to carry in public.

We should start by allowing our officers and soldiers to bear their guns in their free time. They are professionals, and by allowing them to be armed when off duty, we would instantly multiply our societies’ protective force.

But even that will not be enough. The Islamic State has just issued a new order: faithful Muslims must attack the infidels in the only place where all families should feel safe – in our own homes. The police cannot be everywhere, and people must be able to stand their ground.

The Europeans need a Second Amendment. The only question is, how many innocent unarmed people will be slaughtered before lawmakers will be forced to allow people to defend themselves against this deadly menace that has been allowed into our countries by ignorant politicians, the anti-national EU, and the Islamic-dominated UN, all aided by a cowardly press that so willingly hid the inconvenient truths until it was too late?

Via 10news.one.

Ramadan in Australia: Muslim murders man, says “This is for ISIS and al-Qaeda,” cops say terrorism “one line of inquiry”
Trump berates London’s Muslim mayor over response to jihad attacks in London

  1. Tom says

    June 5, 2017 at 9:53 am

    An unarmed population is a victim of political tyranny as well as a victim waiting to be slaughtered.

    Europeans will start arming themselves no matter what the politicians say.

  2. john spielman says

    June 5, 2017 at 9:54 am

    France needs the ARMY and Marie Le Pen to arrest and deport these savages back to their family’s original CRAPISTANS

  3. Charles says

    June 5, 2017 at 10:23 am

    I am in total agreement.
    Our “founding fathers” were very wise men. An armed citizen must have a right to defend him/herself.
    Every law abiding person has that right.

  4. Ed Lee says

    June 5, 2017 at 10:24 am

    “An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.” Robert A. Heinlein.

  5. RonaldB says

    June 5, 2017 at 11:31 am

    Actually, Israel has some very restrictive gun laws:
    “Permits are given only for personal use, not for business in the firearms sale while holders for self-defense purposes may own only one handgun, and are given a lifetime supply of 50 cartridges to take home.”

    My opinion is that the gun restrictions implemented by the left are specifically designed to make the population defenseless against random violence and organized gangs. It is a mechanism to dissolve the bonds of culture and to justify a totalitarian government taking complete charge. Gun control is part of the leftist religion, no longer needing empirical justification, but instead being an article of unchallenged faith.

    The veneer of concern for victims of jihadist, black, and criminal violence becomes thinner and thinner in the statements of western leaders. They say what they have to say to avoid revealing too openly that they actually don’t care that much. They have to provide the lapdog press some kind of fig leaf.

    Incidentally, don’t imagine that leftists won’t be arming themselves as well.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-22/there-will-be-blood-left-prepares-war-after-berkeley-beat-down-combat-training-bette

  6. Tom S. says

    June 5, 2017 at 12:00 pm

    ALL men are endowed with inalienable rights: LIFE, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. The 2nd amendment flows from this. It is not something Governments can bestow or take away. Europeans: Follow a higher law and arm yourselves.

  7. KrazyKafir says

    June 5, 2017 at 12:19 pm

    Only the dullest of mind. or the liberal mind, is too blind or stupid that it can’t foresee the colossal 5th column that the liberal elite have imported into Europe over that last 30 years will eventually start a civil war. There will be a move to have part of the host’s country carved out for an Islamic country. Anyone who doubts this does’t know history with examples like India and Serbia.

  8. Savvy Kafir says

    June 5, 2017 at 12:49 pm

    As a pistol-packing progressive, I have never understood the liberal community’s hysterical fear & hatred of weapons. The fact that even pepper spray is banned in many European countries shows how irrational that “thinking” is among the politically correct.

    As World War III ramps up, and jihadi attacks become more & more frequent, European citizens will definitely need the right to go armed in public. As the saying goes, “When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!”.

  9. Andrew Swallow says

    June 5, 2017 at 1:35 pm

    No what Europe needs is an election recall amendment. So we can replace the fools who are in office but not in charge.

    A Second Amendment would just supply the Muslim gangs with rape and mugging weapons.

    An equivalent agency to ICE may be useful. It will have a considerable amount of work deporting Muslims.

  10. Avi Green says

    June 5, 2017 at 2:16 pm

    You’re absolutely correct. In the meantime, I believe all concerned European citizens who’re knowledgeable and can speak English well enough should be invited to testify before Congressional committees about the situation with Islamism in Europe, because Congress may be able to provide some positive influence. If Nigel Farage, for example, hasn’t visited the US to discuss these matters yet, he should. Anybody else want to ask their elected officials if they can work to arrange the special visits I recommend?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Europe needs a Second Amendment

  1. θ says:

    If a right to own the guns and a restriction of the incitement for violence can effectively reduce any future terrorism by substantively transforming into a case of “workplace violence” by the unstable persons, then all Moslems happily support it.

  2. θ says:

    If the implemnetation of the US 2nd Amendment and the restriction of the US 1st Amendment can spare us Moslems from apologising for future terrorism, as well as a way of vindicating Islam from terrorism, then those policies are Islamic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s