Slavery and rape aren’t wrong when Muslims do it.
“I don’t think it’s morally evil to own somebody.”
“A male owner of a female slave has the right to sexual access to her.”
These views don’t come from an ISIS underground bunker, but out of the brilliantly lit halls of Georgetown University where rape and slavery are defended by an Islamic studies professor.
Georgetown had changed the names of Mulledy Hall and McSherry Hall because Mulledy and McSherry had once been involved in selling some slaves back in the early 19th century. When Christina Hoff Sommers spoke at Georgetown, feminists demanded trigger warnings and a university official threatened College Republicans. But defending actual slavery and rape is still okay at Georgetown.
So long as it’s committed by Muslims under the license of the Koran.
“I don’t think it’s morally evil to own somebody,” Jonathan Brown explained to attendees at his lecture. “Slavery cannot just be treated as a moral evil in and of itself.”
The Georgetown Islamic Studies professor had expelled a critic before the lecture even began. He thought that he was among “brothers” at the International Institute of Islamic Thought. But sitting in the audience was Umar Lee, another convert, but one who unlike Brown had struggled with the morality of his new religion. Some in the audience had questions and Brown had horrifying Islamist answers.
To a man who argued that slavery was wrong, Brown retorted, “How can you say, if you’re Muslim, the Prophet of God had slaves. He had slaves. There’s no denying that. Was he—are you more morally mature than the Prophet of God? No you’re not.”
Slavery can’t be wrong. Not if Mohammed, the prophet of Allah and founder of Islam, had slaves. The Koran is the touchstone of Brown’s personal morality, as it is of every Muslim.
Mohammed was the perfect man and a role model for all Muslims. Therefore rape and child abuse can’t be wrong either. Not when the founder of Islam was both a rapist and a pedophile.
When Brown had been asked in the past about the women and girls sold and raped by ISIS based on Islamic law, he defended the Islamic practice of sex slavery, “There is no doubt that the Quran and Sunna permit this.”
So too when defending Mohammed’s sexual abuse of a 9-year-old girl, Brown insisted, “You cannot say from a Sharia perspective that what the prophet did was wrong because the prophet can’t commit sins.”
How can Mohammed’s slavery and rape be whitewashed? All you have to do is deny the existence of freedom and the right of human beings not to be enslaved and raped.
“It’s very hard to have this discussion because we think of, let’s say in the modern United States, the sine qua non of morally correct sex is consent,” Brown lectured wearily.
“If you take away the consent element, then everyone starts flipping out. Right? At that but you get, rape you get sexual acts done by people who are too young we perceive to consent. And these are sort of the great moral wrongs of our society.”
We focus on consent, Brown explained, because we “fetishize the idea of autonomy”, but “most of human history human beings have not thought of consent as the essential feature of morally correct sexual activity”.
Islam certainly does not. In Islamic morality, consent has as much to do with moral sexual activity as ice cream cones have to do with airplanes. Islam does not offer universal rights, but hierarchies of privilege in return for allegiance to Muslim leaders. It eliminates individual autonomy: whether it’s that of non-Muslim women being raped by Muslim conquerors or non-Muslim slaves reduced to property.
“A male owner of a female slave has the right to sexual access to her… her ‘consent’ would be meaningless since she is his slave,” Brown had also explained in the past.
“Slave women do not have agency over their sexual access, so their owner can have sex with them,” he appears to have written on Facebook.
America is based on equality of rights. Islam is a supremacist system based on inequality.
“We fetishize the idea of autonomy to the extent that we forget, again who’s really free? Are we really autonomous people?” Brown wonders.
This deconstruction of a crime against a woman into philosophizing about the nature of free will isn’t just academic wordplay; it’s the essence of Islam. Islam denies that human beings can be free. Muslims are slaves of Allah. They serve the Caliph. In return, they may force everyone else to serve them.
Is anyone really free? We’re all slaves.
That is the essential idea of Islam. It’s the radical notion of every totalitarian revolutionary movement. If everyone is already enslaved, then enslaving them under the correct way of thinking is really liberation.
No one is free. Therefore those who are more free, because they worship Allah or recognize the evils of capitalism, are doing them a favor by enslaving them.
And the rest is word games.
Jonathan Brown is a Georgetown boy. He got his degree there and these days he holds the Alwaleed bin Talal Chair of Islamic Civilization and directs the Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim Christian Understanding. The $20 million gift from the Saudi prince brought real rape culture to Georgetown.
Don’t look for Georgetown’s Working Group on Slavery or President DeGioia, who decided to rename two buildings because their namesakes had once sold slaves, to get involved. The Saudis still practice their own form of slavery. They only abolished slavery, on an official basis, under pressure from JFK.
These days, the Saudis actually fund people like Brown who defend slavery in the United States.
Brown is valued by his masters for his word games. He deconstructs slavery and rape until they become meaningless. No one is ever free. And as the holder of a chair funded by a slave kingdom, he ought to know.
After the scandal broke, Brown declared on Twitter, “Islam as a faith and I as a person condemn slavery, rape and concubinage.”
In the past, Brown had written, “As for concubinage, there is no doubt that the Quran and Sunna permit this.” At the lecture, he had declared, “If you’re Muslim, the Prophet of God had slaves. He had slaves. There’s no denying that. Was he—are you more morally mature than the Prophet of God?”
But it’s all in how you define slavery, rape or terrorism.
Behind all the words games is a fundamental clash of values and civilizations. American values and Islamic values are not compatible. Islam does not believe in consent, freedom and autonomy. It also doesn’t believe in truth. A dialogue with a totalitarian ideology is meaningless. It consists of deceitful word games used to justify its abuses. Those word games are all that Jonathan Brown has to offer.
It’s all that the left has to offer. That’s why it will protect and defend Brown and his horrifying views.
The modern campus and its obsession with punishing slavery and eradicating rape culture are a sham. Georgetown will lash out at a dead 19th century Jesuit priest, but it will never stand up to the Saudi royals or Jonathan Brown. It will investigate rape culture everywhere except in the speeches and writings of one of its professors who is merely quoting the horrifying body of Islamic jurisprudence.
ISIS atrocities shocked the world. But it’s a shorter distance from ISIS to the modern world than we like to think. You don’t need to travel to Iraq or Syria to listen to it being defended as a way of life.
Just stop by Georgetown instead.
ABOUT DANIEL GREENFIELD
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
Mr. Brown, I am morally superior to the Prophet of Islam. I have never owned a slave, and I have never rap ed a 9-year old girl. You, sir, are incorrect. And what is more, you are disgrace to everything that our country has stood for. Shame …
Unfortunately muslims are above shame, they have no conscience and do not feel embarrassment for their repugnant beliefs and behaviours.
You are on to the critical point that most of the world doesn’t get. The West foolishly deals with and views Islam through Western values. Yet Islam does not view the world this way. Our ideals are for virtue while their ideals are advantage and indulgence. For example, we aspire to be honest, while they have no such concept. In fact, the Koran states that deception and lying is OK in order to achieve one’s goals. They have a completely different world view, and this is the fundamental misunderstanding of the West in dealing with barbarians. This is why it was funny/sad watching the inept previous administration deal with both Iran and the Middle East. As if any agreement Iran signed meant anything. They could not believe there could be the possibility of humans as inept as Kerry in such positions of power in the U.S.
You are spot on! It’s interesting that Western and Eastern European monarchic diplomats always kept in mind the lying nature of Islam when dealing with the Ottomans. Only,
somehow, the liberal West lost this ability of critical thinking when it comes to Islam now.
Fascinating how some people are now saying Trump isn’t all there mentally.
Well either people like me are crazy or the gtown professor is crazy. And the question is, Whose country is it ?
It’s not ours yet.
We’ll have to fight for it.
I understand that everyone around here doesn’t agree with me on that.
And I understand that many high quality people here want to believe in the democracy god.
But somebody’s gonna win this argument.
You’re right, Daniel. We are going to have to fight for it. No doubt. Most people don’t want to face it, but we didn’t start this. Not a day goes by, that it doesn’t get more and more apparent that they are turning up the heat, doing their sneaky best to “trigger” us- individually and as a collective. Bullies don’t scare me, they’re insecure brats.
And yes, I do realize the left will not “go quietly into that good night” aka the “back of the bus” (to quote B.O. a few years back).
They are better organized, but as Dana Loesch so wisely said recently, their goons “couldn’t bust a grape in a fruit fight”. My money is on us. 100%.
They will do anything to delegitimize Trump, yet he is the only one strong enough to save this country. If that’s mentally ill, then let the U.S. be an asylum.
Do you really think Trump’s policies are going to stop terrorism? I think he’s playing right into the terrorist’s plans, making it easier for them to radicalize more people. Trump is so much more than anti-Muslim. He is also racist, biggeted, cruel, childish, and a liar. I don’t believe he has the strength to help America at all.
Yes, I’m sure they’ll stop everything once we stop identifying them and their ideology. 1500 years of domination, Sharia rape and domination will end once we keep silent. As if the Koran and Hadiths will disappear. Research Islam before you make such foolish proclamations.
So you are pro Muslim after reading this article that quotes a professor here in America claiming that raping and enslaving women is moral according to allah? This story should be blastered on every news site across the world.
Trump while not perfect is actually the perfect person to take down the left. He doesn’t care what they say. He is focused and staying on point. He plays as dirty as they do. With the right people around him he will destroy the progressive movement in America. Let’s pray progressives don’t grow a set and actually start a civil war.
The only real concern is how well and how deep does Obama’s goons go inside the government. Will they actually pick obama over country? Can trump gather solid,without a doubt, evidence fast enough that these traitors (obama included) will not only be found guilty legally but also in the public’s opinion?
So go to Syria, Iran and Gaza and commiserate with your people. We will enjoy our freedom. Do you think we’re scared of your terrorism? bring it.
The project is to destroy western man. i slimes concurr. A match made a couple levels lower than purgatory,
seems that other word is too rough for the sissy frontpage spell checkers.
Great quotes but why on Earth would you defend alimony? Giving women automatic custody of children when the fathers are far more capable of child rearing is obscene enough but alimony is even more evil.
I don’t defend alimony in all circumstances, but sometimes it is justified.
Oh don’t worry. In the Muslim world, the man always gets custody of his children. The divorced mother gets nothing, at least as far as I can tell from articles I’ve read.
I think you are right about that.
If all of the ethics and morals of the world’s religions were eliminated………what would be left?
“Might makes right”.
The one and only commandment of the barbarian and pagan.
Islam is that one commandment camouflaged as a true religion.
And why does the Left support Islam in it’s invasion of the West?
Because to return the West to it’s primitive pagan roots……….Western civilization with its Christian foundation must be destroyed.
And what better destroyer can the Left support but a primitive barbarian army dressed up like a real religion?
“And why does the Left support Islam in it’s invasion of the West?” – Daniel.
Indeed its deeply troubling that the same Leftists who shut down truth telling conservative speakers like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Milo on campus, and even riot (as in UC Berkeley), allow a vile misogynistic Islamist to shamelessly promote Islamic rape and slavery in Georgetown university.
That’s the degenerate dystopia the Alinskyite Left is “fundamentally transforming” America into.
Brown’s support of Islamic slave rape is entirely consistent with Islamic view of women as sex objects for gratification of Muslim men.
“Women are your fields, go (men) into your fields as you please” – Quran 2:223.
Consequently Islam not only allows Muslim men 4 wives, but also unlimited number of slave concubines. Any of the 4 wives can easily be disposed off and replaced, by simply stating “I divorce you” thrice. No court process, child custody or alimony negotiations required. It’s all about the Muslim man.
“And if you want to replace one wife with another and you have given her a gift, do not take it back…” – Q 4:21.
Not surprisingly, Islam also promises Muslim men sex in its after-life brothel paradise (Quran 55:57, 56:35, 37:50, 44:45, 52:20). Each male Muslim gets a minimum of 72 virgins:
“The prophet of Allah (Mohammed) said: “The least reward for the people of paradise is 80,000 servants and 72 wives”’ – Al-Tirmidhi 2562, 2687.
Martyrs and Jihadis in Islam’s 1st heaven can expect much more than 72. Interestingly, the virgins re-virginate after sex:
“‘Yes, by him who holds my soul in his hand… when the sex is finished she will return pure and virgin again'” – Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
What more, Muslim men will have permanent erections:
“Each time we sleep with a houri (heavenly maiden) we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the elected (Muslims in heaven) NEVER SOFTENS. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world …Each chosen Muslim will marry seventy houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have APPETIZING VAGINAS” – Al-Suyuti, 15th century Islamic theologian.
You may well be right, but I can assure you that in the case of the individuals that I know, it wouldn’t be out of any personal inclinations in this way, but out of fear of the extremists. Not that it makes much of a difference at the receiving end.
It seems to be a cultural trait that almost nobody pushes back on the extremists, despite not being that way personally – I suspect that it’s because at some level, they are of the opinion that they’re not on solid theological ground to push back, and therein lies the problem. And that is why the same problems happen pretty much everywhere where Islam is the dominant religion (or on its way to dominance, which empowers supremacists, generally – when they’re on the way down, then you see the normal people taking control of the discourse a lot more).
Hence my saying that Islam is the problem, not the individuals themselves.
Most are in fact placid, when they are on their own.
put them in a group with other muslims, where they feel superiour numbers, then the game changes.
Just as the pedophile mohummad taught.
When in a position of weakness, play the victim.
When in a position of strength, fight and kill in the name of allah until all are killed except those who worship hubal the moon god.
There, fixed up your lack of clarity in your first sentence for you. You are welcome btw.
Not true. On an individual basis, most are perfectly wonderful people, DESPITE the horrible ideology of Islam.
The wonder to me is that their good side has resisted the ideology so well, rather than the other way around.
Look at our own societies, which produce evil leftists in similar quantity to their Islamists, on much milder ideology!
It’s the ideology that we need to attack. That does involve restrictions on individuals (such as the Trump Travel Ban), but we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that the main problem isn’t individuals, but the surrounding ideology.
Leftists are usually less dangerous on an individual level than Islamists, but I suspect that the proportions of leftists in Western societies roughly parallels the proportion of Islamists in Muslim ones.
Islamists are a huge problem, but think of how LITTLE they’d affect Western societies if they weren’t ENABLED by leftists and other useful idiots.
That’s sort-of my point, along with saying that it never ceases to amaze me how normal, nice people can come out of vicious environments like Islamist societies – proving that humans are fairly resilient to evil in general.
The problem is that in a society which promotes evil, the evil ones are empowered and not punished. That’s what goes on in Islamist circles. We see similar behaviour with leftists, though I do agree with you that it doesn’t lead to rape epidemics – but it’s bad enough as it is without needing to add Islamists to the mix!
Brown converted to Islam. Georgetown is an RCC university. The RCC says it is the only true church and way to salvation. Georgetown is now being sued by descendants of slaves because in the 1800s Georgetown owned and sold some slaves. Brown a European converts to Islam and now condones slavery, is working for a university that is being sued by slave descendants. Pure degeneracy.
I graduated from a Jesuit Loyola university but they were unable to indoctrinate me (and I was a cradle Catholic). There is only one way to deal with the cucks and libertards: IQ. I always start my arguments with IQ, from there you will get 3 distinct race groups: Caucasians, Asians, blacks. This means separation between the races is best. Because of my beliefs I left the RCC since I don’t accept black/Asian priests-popes. A consistent, logical argument will cause many problems, but people eventually come around and realize I’m right.
Brilliant, as usual.
I would only note that Islam does believe in truth, but only what is regarded as truth under islamic reasoning. In Islam, the highest standard of truth is Islam. Period. Facts, logic, and history are relevant only to the extent they support Islam.
Cut down to its bare bones, the islamic understanding of truth is: truth is that which makes Islam look good, and falsehood is that which makes Islam look bad.
As a muslim, Brown is being consistently honest here. In front of a muslim/sympathetic audience, he simply states the truth of what is written in the Koran. In front of an external non-muslim audience which he knows disapproves of his remarks, he realizes that Islam’s legitimization of slavery will paint Islam in a negative light, so he now claims that he opposes slavery, in order to protect the highest truth, Islam.
This is not even taqqiya. It is simply the way Muslims think. And it is exactly why I stopped trying to “debate” Muslims years ago.
Western reasoning and Islamic reasoning are very different, to the extent of being incompatible and mutually exclusive. In the West, we believe a thing because we think it is true. In Islam (and unsurprisingly, liberal ideology as well), we think a thing is true because we believe it.
I leave it to the reader to decide which mode of thought has produced the better culture.
I eagerly await the women’s march to shut Georgetown and that idiot down not just for condoning rape and slavery. But arguing that it is an affirmative right and good.
Note the silence from a Left. Esp the silence from the SJW’s.
Tells you all you really need to know about the Left, I have heard an unending screeching from the Left about how women are treated, “war on women,” the locker room talk of Trump. etc etc.
Yet here we have a man openly defending rape and slavery. And not a peep is heard.
If it were not such as serious matter it would be laughable.
I have heard of the atrocities in the south of Sudan. Over the last eight years, I sent numerous emails and formal letters to the Obama Administration, practically begging them to do something about the situation. In those mailings, I included my real name, address, phone, and email address. Not ONCE … in eight years … did I hear back, from them.
The other day, I sent a letter to Stephen Miller … a man who, by any definition, is very busy, these days. Less than 24 hours later, I received a reply thanking me for the letter, and stating, emphatically, that he would make sure that the proper people were made aware of the situation.
This compares favorably to 2001. My niece was doing missionary work in Nicaragua, while Daniel Ortega … a communist … was running for President. Several people had talked to her of their fears of being killed for supporting Ortega’s opponents. I immediately called the White House, and was put through to Condoleeza Rice. She wasn’t aware of the situation (the administration had just took power), and the Clintons had not briefed them on the situation in Nicaragua. She said she would get back to me.
Two days later, she did, and said that they would take steps to keep Ortega out of power. They were able to do that, until 2007 (when US resources were ate up with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq).
Never … ever … feel that your opinion means nothing to the White House, especially in a Republican Administration.
BTW, I agree entirely with your statements about defending the West against Islam, no matter the cost.
First of all………I want to give DG props for doing an article on this subject. Very few(if any) journalists would tread on this ground.
A Muslim militia known as the Janjaweed operates TODAY in Sudan, North Africa.
The Janjaweed are Arab Muslims who enslave, human traffick, rape and murder black Christians from southern Sudan.
This has been going on for a long time.
But you never heard about it before……..right?
Blacks being enslaved and oppressed?……………..US media should be howling to high heaven………right?
Not when the oppressors are the Left’s favorite “victim” class………..Muslims.
And why are Muslims viewed as the pre-eminent victims over all the other victim classes of the Left?
Muslims kill gays……….Muslims are defended.
Muslims rape and kill women………Muslims are defended.
Muslims oppress blacks……….Muslims are defended.
On and on and on.
It’s simple…………..Islam is by far the the biggest threat to Western democracies of all the victim classes the Left loves to elevate over the normal citizen.
The Left wants the destruction of Western civilization and whichever victim class can deliver that destruction will be exalted above all others.
This useful idiot professor defending Islam against the righteous criminal charges being levied against it by the rational and ethical citizens of the West is just a propagandist on the order of a Josef Goebbels.
Human history is not an exercise in ethics.
It is an exercise in……………WHO ARE THE RULERS and WHO ARE THE RULED?
The Leftist professors want the West to be ruled by Muslims.
The West did not resist earlier Muslim invasions due to the “moral superiority” of democracy or the electoral process.
The West was not democratic and had NO electoral process when it resisted the Muslims at Vienna in the 1600’s.
The GUN and a warrior spirit is the only thing that has saved the world from the onslaught of Islam for 1400 years.
Christianity was the moral foundation of the West that resisted the Muslim horde for all those centuries.
And now that it’s gone………..you see the debased and deranged Leftists surrendering to it with their golden calf of multiculturalism.
The golden calf must be destroyed.
The Left must be destroyed.
DELENDE EST DAR AL ISLAM.
Maybe you doubt all of this?
That civil war prediction I made here at FPM 36 hours before our last election is looking better everyday………isn’t it?
“The Janjaweed are Arab Muslims who enslave, human traffick, rape and murder black Christians from southern Sudan.” –> Yes- and have been doing so for many, many years. Speaking of Goebbels, there’s a leftist ‘documentary’ (can’t recall the name right now)- filmed by a white NGO guy…and guess who was featured in it- Senator dingleBarry himself. There’s a leftist rally featuring him that just happened to coincide with his POTUS run…I need to check it out again, ’cause Samantha Powers, the EPA commie (Gina maybe?), and a bunch of others from his cabinet are with him on stage, railing against Bush.
It was interesting to see them together, in hindsight. It’s just another data point, corroborating their precision choreography. Of course, he did jack squat about the Christian, black victims being slaughtered, raped, and enslaved for 8 years- when he could’ve done a whole lot more than use their suffering as a political opportunity. It’s sick.
Trump is being sabotaged at every turn on a daily basis.
And very soon we’re about to reach a point where Trump supporters will realize that the DEMS, RINOS and federal bureaucrats are seeking to overthrow Trump.
This will be a crisis day rivaled only by the outbreak of the first civil war.
I am not Jewish, but I regard the Israelis as the best example on earth of a people who must walk the fine line of using overwhelming force for defense while still maintaining a high level of humanitarian ethics.
This is the mentality we should keep in mind………….but pacifism in the face of evil will not suffice.
i, too, mostly agree with your prediction of civil war. unfortunately, because we are a nation of laws, we cannot, and *must* not, strike preemptively. we must scrupulously follow the law, and even use civil disobedience, calling the attention of the State ourselves to our breaking of the law, to try to turn the ship of state. we must wait until the bitter end, when the Republic has actually perished and people are being murdered by the State, before our rebellion can be morally justified. even monumentally stupid and deluded leftist americans must be given every chance to see that they are throwing away freedom before we can justify taking up arms. it’s the same reasoning we must use when somebody murders a loved one; the initial impulse is to kill the offender and be done with it, but we *must* let the law take its course. otherwise, why bother pretending to believe something that we so obviously do not?
that said, i am praying that mr. trump’s election can turn us around. he has the chance to stop all the ruinous policies of the traitor mr. obama, but so far, he and his team do not seem to grasp the gravity of the attacks of islam. we must do all that we can to bring it to their attention, and also to the attention of those of our fellow citizens who are oblivious to the deadly danger.
Actually, the Janjaweed operate in western Sudan and eastern Chad. Darfur and thereabouts. Pretty much everybody in the area is Muslim. The nomadic Janjaweed are ethnically Arab, no doubt with a LOT of African blood, and they spend their time attacking settled more African people in the area, some of whom are rebelling against the central government in Khartoum.
The conflict you’re thinking of was between the northern Muslim Arabs and the southern blacks who were Christians and animists. That particular conflict more or less ended when South Sudan became independent, though the fighting there promptly shifted to a civil war.
There’s truth in what you wrote but I wonder if lefties would defend gays, women or Blacks if they were oppressing and murdering moslems. It seems to me that lefties will always defend any of their favored groups, classes or demographics that aren’t part of the “Western Patriarchy” and never blame them for anything. The left has never held gays, women or Blacks accountable for what they do, not even when they victimize each other. Why would they do it if they harmed moslems? I think attacking Western culture is their main goal.
My Dad had an old friend. Big tough guy. Used to regularly come home drunk and beat the crap out of his small, somewhat fragile wife.
One night she’d had enough. So when he passed out after beating her up, she tied him spreadeagled on the bed face up. Next morning when he woke up with a severe hangover, she beat the crap out of him with the buckle end of his belt.
Oddly enough, he used to tell the story with great pride. Never got drunk enough to lay a finger on her again.
You just don’t get it. As long as you wear a skull cap and a pair of pajamas you can abuse any infidel woman you want. If she’s your wife you get to beat her first.
Unless ya married a redheaded gun totin Irish girl like I did, whose last words before trigger pull would have been “convert this (expletive deleted)”.
That’s the official policy of the Moslem Brotherhood.
How can we confront this insidious assault on our Constitution when federal judges pervert it’s clear meaning and confer religious liberty to those not even in the U.S? When the media perpetuates the myth that to bar Muslims is in violation of the Constitution’s ban on religious test, even though the context is regarding holding public office. The Republicans in Congress need to reign in these seditious judges by utilizing the power of impeachment. In addition they need to initiate procedures for adopting an amendment that would define and codify what is and what is not protected religion.
A number of years back I was talking with a friend and during our discussion I stated that Oprah Winfrey was the most dangerous person in America. He was incredulous and wanted to know why I could make such an outlandish statement. I said it was because under the guise of presenting wholesome American values she promotes leftist principles of moral relativism and socialism. In much the same way Professor Brown is more dangerous to our Republic than “Lone wolf” terrorists. I am not saying that we should not do everything necessary to protect American citizens. What I am saying is that the incursion into academia, government(see Keith Ellis) the media and popular culture of people who seek to incrementally introduce aspects of Sharia is the real danger. The fact is that the so called moderate Muslim leaders goals are the same as the “extremist”. A fire in the house gets our immediate attention. Carbon dioxide we don’t even notice
The untold story of slavery on the African continent. Portuguese, English and Dutch were the buyers but Arab muslims were the middlemen. You didn’t find lily-white Europeans stomping through the forests, jungles and deserts of Africa to capture slaves. The greatest slavers of all time are the Arabs and they’re still at it.
“The trade of slaves across the Sahara and across the Indian Ocean also has a long history, beginning with the control of sea routes by Arab and Swahili traders on the Swahili Coast during the ninth century. These traders captured Bantu peoples from the interior in present-day Kenya, Mozambique and Tanzania and brought them to the seaports.
The captives were sold throughout the Middle East. This trade accelerated as superior ships led to more trade and greater demand for labor on plantations in the region. Eventually, tens of thousands of captives were being taken every year. Indian Ocean slave trade was multi-directional and changed over time. To meet the demand for menial labor, Bantu slaves bought by Arab slave traders from southeastern Africa were sold in cumulatively large numbers over the centuries to customers in Egypt, Arabia, the Persian Gulf, India, European colonies in the Far East, the Indian Ocean islands, Ethiopia and Somalia.
Slave labor in East Africa was drawn from the Zanj, Bantu peoples that lived along the East African coast.The Zanj were for centuries shipped as slaves by Arab traders to all the countries bordering the Indian Ocean.
Zanzibar is a perfect example:
“Every year, about 40, 000-50, 000 slaves were taken to Zanzibar. About a third went to work on clove and coconut plantations of Zanzibar and Pemba while the rest were exported to Persia, Arabia, the Ottoman Empire and Egypt. Conditions on the plantations were so harsh that about 30% of the male slaves died every year, thus necessitating the need to import another batch of slaves.The Omani Arabs who ruled Zanzibar had in the words of the American diplomat Donald Petterson a “culture of violence” where brute force was the preferred solution to problems and outlandish cruelty was a virtue.The ruling al-Busaid family was characterized by fratricidal quarrels as it was common for brother to murder brother, and this was typical of the Arab aristocracy, where it was acceptable for family members to murder one another to gain land, wealth, titles and slaves.Visitors to Zanzibar often mentioned the “shocking brutality” which the Arab masters treated their African slaves, who were so cowed into submission that there was never a slave revolt attempted on Zanzibar. The cruelty which the Arab masters treated their black slaves left behind a legacy of hate, which exploded in the revolution of 1964.”
For many centuries, there was a slave trade across the Sahara. The death rate is estimated at 90℅.
For the Atlantic trade, it was somewhere around 15%. One neat factoid about the Atlantic slave is that the crews of the ships had a considerably higher mortality rate than the cargo.
All quite true. Except I wasn’t talking about the continent of Africa as a whole and throughout history. I referred to Atlantic trade, from which almost all American slaves are descended.
The vast majority were shipped between about 1600 and 1830. Over this period, the conditions ion West African coast was as I described.I beg to differ and request that you cite your sources. Mine tell a very different story, that with the exception of West Africa nearly all the African slave trade on the coasts was controlled by muslim sultans.
Muslim Sultans controlled the African slave trade in North Africa, the Horn of Africa and Zanzibar. Arab or Islamic slave trade lasted much longer than Atlantic or European slave trade: “It began in the middle of the seventh century and survives today in Mauritania and Sudan. With the Islamic slave trade, we’re talking of 14 centuries rather than four.” Further, “whereas the gender ratio of slaves in the Atlantic trade was two males to every female, in the Islamic trade, it was two females to every male.”
The Barbary slave trade refers to the slave markets that flourished on the Barbary Coast of North Africa, which included the Ottoman provinces of Algeria, Tunisia and Tripolitania and the independent sultanate of Morocco, between the 16th and middle of the 18th century. The Ottoman provinces in North Africa were nominally under Ottoman suzerainty, but in reality they were mostly autonomous. The North African slave markets were part of the Arab slave trade.
The Barbary Coast
European slaves were acquired by Barbary pirates in slave raids on ships and by raids on coastal towns from Italy to Spain, Portugal, France, England, the Netherlands, and as far as Ireland and Iceland.
In the 8th century, Africa was dominated by Arab-Berbers in the north: Islam moved southwards along the Nile and along the desert trails. One supply of slaves was the Solomonic dynasty of Ethiopia which often exported Nilotic slaves from their western borderland provinces, or from newly conquered or reconquered Muslim provinces. Native Muslim Ethiopian sultanates (rulership) exported slaves as well, such as the sometimes independent sultanate (rulership) of Adal .
For a long time, until the early 18th century, the Crimean Khanate maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East. Between 1530 and 1780 there were almost certainly 1 million and quite possibly as many as 1.25 million white, European Christians enslaved by the Muslims of the Barbary Coast of North Africa.
On the coast of the Indian Ocean too, slave-trading posts were set up by Muslim Arabs.The archipelago of Zanzibar, along the coast of present-day Tanzania, is undoubtedly the most notorious example of these trading colonies. Southeast Africa and the Indian Ocean continued as an important region for the Oriental slave trade up until the 19th century.Livingstone and Stanley were then the first Europeans to penetrate to the interior of the Congo basin and to discover the scale of slavery there. The Arab Tippu Tib extended his influence and made many people slaves.After Europeans had settled in the Gulf of Guinea, the trans-Saharan slave trade became less important. In Zanzibar, slavery was abolished late, in 1897, under Sultan Hamoud bin Mohammed. The rest of Africa had no direct contact with Muslim slave-traders.
Accurate, except very few slaves were sold to European slavers by Arab Muslims. Pretty much the entire Slave Coast was controlled by powerful African pagan kings and chiefs who tightly controlled their middleman position. No doubt some of the slaves they sold had originally been enslaved by Arab raiders, but they passed thru multiple hands before getting to the coast.
Very true. Here are a few non wiki sources to enjoy, but the story is ever worse than wikipedia.
Arab Muslim World: Architect of Slave Trade in Africa,Feb 6, 2013
by Jean Marie Dia
Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, The Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800 (Early…Nov 4, 2004
by R. Davis
Slavery and Muslim Society in Africa: The Institution in Saharan and Sudanic Africa and the Trans-Saharan Trade1971
by Allan G. B. Fisher and Humphrey J. Fisher
Slavery in the Arab World Paperback – April 21, 1998
by Murray Gordon
Islam’s Black Slaves: The Other Black Diaspora Paperback – February 9, 2002
by Ronald Segal
You would think they would be left only with taqyya, especially after this very true statement: “We focus on consent, Brown explained, because we “fetishize the idea of autonomy”, but “most of human history human beings have not thought of consent as the essential feature of morally correct sexual activity”. However, the Left continue to support Islam as they both hate Christianity. They are both aligned in their Arab philosophy that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. It also shows that the Left never really cared about victims, but just used victimhood to gain status and power.
Well,see?….this is what happens when you bow down to a goddamn meteorite in the Arabian desert…..you regress into some sort of medieval barbarian
“This deconstruction of a crime against a woman into philosophizing about
the nature of free will isn’t just academic wordplay; it’s the essence
of Islam. Islam denies that human beings can be free. Muslims are slaves
of Allah. They serve the Caliph. In return, they may force everyone
else to serve them.”
Judaism and Christianity ask you to choose.
Islam commands you to submit.
This is the problem.
An article that is about as good as an article gets.
The mythical “Mohammed” was about the most evil man imaginable, so demolishing the idea of Mohammed as “the perfect man” seems appropriate.
I wonder if there was anything good he did in his life?
yes, but he undid it; he freed his first slave, then adopted him. later, of course, he UN-adopted him so he could take his wife, and totally corrupted him by making him one of the first muslims.
all told, zayd ibn harithah (ex-ibn muhammed) got the short end of the stick, just like every other muslim who has ever lived under this poisonous cult.
They will weave, plan, and manipulate the liberals to get closer to their objective: Sharia Law. They understand Karl Marx’s belief: In order to change a country, change its culture. This premise is slowly working. They have taken hold of the higher institutions of learning and are successfully changing the mind frame of our snowflakes. They know that it may be more difficult to commit 911 like events, so changing our values, morals, and identity becomes the new plan of attack. It is up to us to conclude if it is working.
IMO, IT IS Working, It has been working for quite a few decades. When their beloved USSR fell, the sandal wearing, flower in their hair hippies decided it was better to infiltrate the colleges and universities as Deans and professors to start the brainwashing of the yoots. Those yoots from the sixties are now themselves profs and ensconced in government agencies. Back power communist Angela Davis became a professor, Anti-America radical bombers Ayers and Dohrn became professors. In fact, Ayers and Dohrn held fundraisers in their home for the Sultan Hussein Obama. Most of our institutions are plain hotbed of communism and political correctness indoctrination centers. Even the high schools are getting in the act. Courtesy of the communist controlled NEA unions. The democrat party is now the official communist party of the USA.
US in deep deep doo. We are possible past the point of no return. The public schools, universities, entertainment industry and the MSM all under communist/socialist control are powerful forces changing the country.
Very true and well said. If we want to see where we are going look no further than France, Germany, and Great Britain.
IMO, we will become like those countries if Trump fails. I was not a Trump supporter at the start. I supported Cruz, in retrospect, Trump was the only candidate w/ the oomph to take down the Clinton/MSM/NWO/OWG machine.
Right now he’s fighting a One man war against the dems/marxist/MSM alliance, w/o much, strike that, w/ NO support from the usual spineless R’s in Congress who are scared to death of the MSM and prefers to curry favor w/ them rather than fight back. At least the Marxist party stands by their Komrades, come hell or high water. The R’s a just mealy mouth pols.
and it *IS* working.
ever notice what the commies used to do when they seized control of a third-world country? the very first thing was to teach everybody how to read. this fulfilled two objectives: first, and foremost in the beginning, it looked good, because they were helping people; second, however, they didn’t give them anything to read but their own drivel. it allowed them to take over the culture by indoctrinating its children.
the left in this country finally realized that, and now that it has turned schools into indoctrination centers, it will be extremely difficult to escape them. *everybody* comes out of just about *any* school at least a nominal leftist, because they have never heard anything but the bulls**t lies they have been told for almost their entire lives. they have not been taught to think critically, so that skill must be learned the hard way (if it is ever learned). and the propaganda mills (media) skillfully fill their eyes and ears with more lies every waking moment.
the most important part is that the bulls**t starts when the children are very young and impressionable. things we learn early in our lives stick with us for life for the most part; it takes life-shattering events to get past that wall of internal lies. once they are turned loose as adults, they have a chance to figure out how things really work, but besides having to re-invent thinking tools that were invented centuries ago, they have to overcome the internal cage of lies. the left have had decades to perfect their lies, and they’re getting really good at it.
if ever there was a problem that only God can solve, this is it. and He may very well use a civil war to solve it.
I agree. It is like having admiration for the Hell’s Angles because they do a ‘Santa Claus’ run for toys. If the Republicans do get off their big a$$’s, then they have to become pariah’s in their state.
Daniel, Did you see the “Battle Hymn of the Republic” at the inauguration ceremony?
For me, it was a moment for the ages.
I believe you just referenced the music Julia Ward Howe used to construct the “Battle Hymn”
The leftists and communists are using Moslems and Islam to help gain and hold power, just like they have and are using the illegals for same. They are thinking long term, w/ millions of illegals having American citizens after they have broken American law to cross the border, these are future Marxist party voters. They see the same thing happening w/ the Moslems. But, the Marxist party, while thinking long term are not quite thinking long enough.
While the vast majority of illegals and their children and grandchildren will not be changing the laws in drastic ways,, once the Moslems gain vast political powers due to their large population, the children and grandchildren of today’s communists and leftists will be in for a culture shock as they just may be forced to live under Sharia laws where some of them may be thrown off tall buildings because of their lifestyle choices. The days of tolerant drug usages will come to an end. Today’s leftists are only thinking about themselves( not their grand children or great grand children or great great) and maybe 10-20 yrs down the road. Moslems are thinking hundred of years down the road. Islam and Western cultures are Not compatible. In the end, One culture will /must become dominant, the other subservient. If only I could have another hundred years to find out which one.
Leftists are like Santa Anna. He stupidly thought he could use the Texans to drive the Commanche he never could beat out of wild territory claimed by Mexico, and then he would come in and drive out the Texans. It’s the same type of illogic and lack of critical thinking applied to moslems.
Critical thoughts/thinking is foreign to the left. They are driven, or more importantly, lead by their Emotional nose ropes.
Amazing. Islam is making incredible inroads into this nation, thanks to the Left dumbing down the electorate via public schools. And Islam is fundamentally immoral.
filthy barbarians have controlled the education system in the u.s. at least since the 1960s, so this is the *only* type they let in. rather like letting charlie manson go camping with girl scouts.
Follow the money. The Left, it “true believers” and fellow travelers are slaves. The are committed heart and soul to their delusional IDEOLOGY. They will embrace any IDEA, Movement or BELIEF to push their IDEOLOGY forward. The consequences of the IDEOLOGY both intended and unintended are irrelevant as long as the ENDS are met. Those ENDS are always justified by any and all MEANS necessary.
The Left are TOTALITARIANS and the use of Political Correctness, Multi-Culturalism and Social Justice prove it.
By Brown’s “logic,” all individual rights are but “fetishes,” as well. Can you imagine Keith Ellison leading the DNC down that primrose path? Expect him to. Expect the Democrats to nod yes. After all, according to Obama, we’re just “clingers,” ignorant yahoos governed by “fetishes.”
Thank you Dan for breaking this down to its fundamental elements and revealing that inadvertently Brown does highlight the radical departure that western enlightenment took from all of mankind’s historical record. We do recognize, as opposed to “fetishize”, human autonomy and individual freedom. With that departure we separate ourselves from the savage history that Islam is trying to justify and force on the world. To insist that a man, we are all imperfect, is an ideal and therefore his prejudices and hostilities can’t be questioned is itself a violation of reason and every person’t obligation to exercise his highest human capacity, which is his mind that separates us from all the other animals. The regressive left’s campaign since its beginning has been a regression from that enlightenment despite its claim of being pro science and individual liberty. The irrationality of all their offshoot movements is that history’s greatest defenders and protectors of the equality of women are the same ones that the women’s liberation vilifies with with every word escaping their irrational minds.
Brown is just waiting for the opportunity to have his own slaves. His hypocrisy knows no bounds. in 1970 he would be thrown out of any university for teaching that slavery was moral. Today he is approved of. The university should be ashamed, as a Christian institution for permitting this immoral rant on its campus.
Wonder how this plays with campus feminists? Next thing the DC hospitals will be requiring female circumcision too.
Maybe the GW will require female circumcision as a graduation requirement?
I’m sure the feminists approve. That’s why they were not out protesting . After all, slavery is only evil when it involves white men. Arabs and Africans are allowed to own slaves because they are non-whites.
Arabs are White trash. Lefties cant admit that Whites are native to Africa, that they have been living on every continent except Antarctica and probably South America for tens of thousands of years, and living in Asia for hundreds of thousands. Whites are supposed to be European invaders and imperialists, so to lefties none of the White people outside the West are really White or authentic. Aborigines, Solomon Islanders, Ainu, Indians, Persians, Turks, Arabs, et al are some mythical “dark” people, even though most of them aren’t dark.
Lefties are race obsessed and hate Whites because they hate their own cultures.
They hate whites because we are the greatest barrier to their ambitions. To put a finer point on it, they hate us because they hate the Enlightenment which emerged from the white European culture of the 17th and 18th centuries, and it’s influence has spread throughout the world.
And of course, the left defines “slavery” as traditional marriage and family, and private property rights.
Just a few years ago I could not have predicted how far and fast a large segment of American society would sink. This article illustrates this fact as well as anything I’ve read. It is scary.
I used to work with a guy who had as his computer cover screen, a picture of some bad a$$ looking AR15 with all of the cool add ons. I used to chuckle to myself that an adult male could be so enamored with a gun that he would only get to shoot out on the range, and I wondered if guys like this subconsciously wanted the sh’t to hit the fan so they could play gi joe.
Now I find myself doing Web searches for AR15’s and suppressors and night vision. I can’t believe that what I used to think was silly, may soon be necessary for self defense. If I get one, I guess I can go ask this guy to teach me how to use it.
Look – if that’s the subculture the left wants, that’s what they should embrace. Maybe it’s time for Islamic Autonomous Regions in the US, say, every liberal arts college campus, where only sharia rules and only Islam is taught.
Comparing the trajectories of Islam and Judaism, one wonders whether early liberation of women in the latter group positively impacted long- term cognitive metrics. Sexual selection (vs sexual slavery/rape culture) by females who must invest immense resources in their offspring may partially account for the intelligence differential (+15 IQ pts).
possible, although the inbreeding might account for it as well (if marrying one’s cousin was OK for the profit (no capital, and this spelling is appropriate), it’s OK with muslims), i have read counter-arguments saying that inbreeding doesn’t result in dain bramage. i haven’t bothered checking it out, because having closely-related parents *must* increase the chance of recessive genes matching up, just statistically; it’s a matter of how bad the average recessive gene is, and how good the repair and coping mechanisms are. given the same woman and her children in a loving home and in an abusive one, it would stand to reason that there is more chance that she will die early in the abusive home, and the thug who murdered her will not protect or love her surviving children.
Do a Google search on this problem in the UK. Birth defects in the Muslim community is 30 some % higher because of the first cousins thing.
Compare the moral destitution of Brown to Trump’s ‘locker room’ observations.
Then see which attracts rent a crowd in the streets and on the campuses.
The left is sick in the way the nazis and bolsheviks were sick. That’s very, very sick. Sick to a degree that must inevitably end in conflict between civilisation and a moral cesspit. If we can’t reason with them, we’ll have to fight with them.
Radical Muslims and progressives are basically the same because they are:
1. Both antisemitic
2. Both centralized fascist government
3. Both will punish any one who disagrees with them
4. Both believe in lying for their cause
5. Both believe in segregation
6. Both anti Christian
7. Both use brainwashing techniques on Children
8. Both like to cheat and rig laws before and during elections
9. BOTH ABUSE CHILDREN EVEN TO THE DEATH FOR POLITICAL GAIN!!
There is a rape culture and that culture is Islam. Islam is also a slavery culture. The two go hand in hand and are different sides of the same coin. The primary purpose of Muslims forcing people into slavery is so they can be raped at will. The free labor a slave provides is incidental to having unchallenged access to their bodies for sexual purposes.
“Professor” Brown should be physically enslaved by his Islamic masters… And then speak about its “righteousness”…
He would quickly develop the “fetish” for freedom and autonomy…
Does he support feminists, I wonder ? /sarcasm
Only when they are bowing down to Islamic male supremacy. No sarcasm intended
I have a feeling Mr. Brown (or is it Mr. Grey?) has some leather in his closet. This could be more than just Leftist moral dishonesty in the name of political correctness.
True. But the Brownshirts and Muslims have always been such good friends; it’s really not too much of a surprise.
Sick, twisted ideology. Muslim males can justify any perverted behavior in the name of their chauvinistic, male oriented, Sharia law – and they get away with it because no one goes after them. Ever hear of Muslims getting arrested in Dearborn Michigan? Me neither.
I think the name Muhammad should be outlawed as racist and sexist. I would like to get a campus debate on that and see by what logicalargument this can be denied unless we have freedom to any views speach or names we like
… islam has rules for when it’s OK to fart in the mosque. sorry; couldn’t resist it.
“fetishize the idea of autonomy”. funny mixture of words.
The Left fetishize the idea of socialism – ignoring its bloody history.
That’s why they call us tea baggers. They want to be bagged. I’ll bet Obama has a mouthful right now. Michelle’s.
This article is one of the most powerful arguments I have ever heard that mohamed was a false prophet, and islam a lie.
Isn’t Georgetown supposed to be a Catholic university run by Jesuits?
Yet Georgetown is accepting, without question, these abhorrent statements from a Muslim (convert) professor at its Saudi funded institute for Islamic studies?
Something is seriously wrong with Catholic education.
Many things are also seriously wrong with Islam, including its position on slavery. Islam is simply incompatible with western democracy and is unacceptable as a political system in western democracies.
Although this Jonathan Brown character should be disqualified from academic credibility because of these statements on slavery, this Jonathan Brown is dangerous because of the position he holds at Georgetown, which suggests an undeserved credibility and legitimacy.
Daniel, please keep shining a strong light under the rocks this Jonathan Brown lives beneath. People like this Jonathan Brown need to be exposed for what they are and the despicable doctrines they promote need to be held up to public ridicule, scorn and contempt.
google the jesuit oath, shocking.
Yes, but unfortunately the Jesuit order has been plagued by toxic spiritual pride for quite some time. (Not all– notably Mitch Pacwa who writes/teaches on EWTN media.)
They will accept that islam teaches rape and slavery and pedophilia.
The left will not accept any non muslim saying Islam teaches rape and slavery and pedophilia.
Mr. Brown, just about every human is superior to , who is nothing but an evil child raping warlord who foisted an evil based program as a religion.
Islamic morality, unlike the Judeo-Christian one, is highly selective and extremely flexible. Muslims can do no wrong and non-Muslims are always wrong.
By the way, Prof. Brown didn’t say anything knew . According to the Muslim sources, he was a pedophile, war lord, backstabber, liar, murderer, womanizer, and a slaver. It so happened that Muslims are taught that Muhammad is a “perfect man for all times”, and they’re supposed to emulate him.
Unfortunately, too many people here don’t understand it.
He’s not alone. There are plenty of Islamist scoundrels like him and the universities look the other way in order to collect fat grants from the Saudi Arabia and Gulf States.
Some of the reported comments sound like something I would say when describing what Islam teaches, and others like he agrees and approves.
Georgetown has SOLD its very SOUL to the ENEMY of FREEDOM for blood sucking MONEY.
I think the vast majority of people commenting on FrontPageMag are more morally mature than the prophet of Islam. I hope most leftists in this country are also. This twit claims he condemns slavery, rape, and concubinage, (notice he didn’t say anything about pedophilia), but he will not speak out against it when practiced under the aegis of Islam. His idiocy i nothing more than an outrageous quantity of mental masturbation.
Charles Manson is more “morally mature” (derp) than Muhammad was.
Probably so, which is really scary when you consider how that affects the fundamentalist jihadi types who are acting on the authority of the prophet and how the left cannot understand it.
Why not say it simply:
I REJECT ISLAM AS A FALSE RELIGION AND IDEOLOGY.
What always amazes me is how the vast majority of Muslims are decent, nice, law-abiding, congenial people DESPITE being believers in Islam. It goes to show the resiliency of the good side of human nature. I say this as someone who spends a LOT of time among Muslims, the VAST majority of whom I can only say good things about on a personal level.
Hopefully you’ll be able to continue to spend time around the Muslims.
These “decent” people should start thinking about a way to become part of a solution instead of just squatting in America.
I think the way things are now may not be the way they will always be.
Oh, you are right. Among more recent arrivals, there is a MUCH bigger problem.
Indeed, it’s rather “amusing” to hear *other* Muslims ranting about Syrian refugees, sounding much the same as we do. BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHAT THEY GOT AWAY FROM AND DON’T WANT IT HERE ANY MORE THAN WE DO.
I’m mostly talking about people who left the Middle East YEARS ago, when things weren’t so nasty.
They will become casualties of the backlash that will occur as a result of these recent refugees.
Which is why they should act now…..before it’s too late.
I sure hope so.
I couldn’t agree more.
If *I* were Muslim, I wouldn’t content myself to not be a part of the problem. I’d be actively speaking out about how I’m not a part of the problem.
(a) because it’s the right thing to do and (b) for the very reason which you suggest, to make it crystal-clear what side I’m on.
The time will come when fence-sitting OR THE APPEARANCE of fence-sitting w.r.t. Islamists will NOT be a good place to be.
Islamopithecines first attacked the World Trade Center 14 years ago, and the Near East has been nasty for 1400 years. Koranimals celebrated wherever they squatted around America on 911.
Kiranimals are dirtbags everywhere and at all times.
It would be interesting to see how he would feel about it if the sexes were reversed. For some men it seems very hard to comprehend that women are people. Would he feel the same way if his prophet advocated rape and sexual slavery of men?
Typical liberal leftwing democrats who have no shame. these people only care about their political bias. they will allow rape and slavery in a second if it is part of the part of their narrative and agenda. Liberalism at its core is rotten. rotten, violent, intolerant, divisive, bigoted, and racist.
A single professor advocating against the nation’s culture and heritage is not sufficient reason to decertify a university. A university teaching courses that promote a seemingly seditious SJW point of view still doesn’t mandate censure. But at some point a line is crossed and only a foolish nation would provide funding for universities and students which threaten our national interest in self-preservation. Georgetown University is rapidly approaching that point.
Islam is truly a mental disease.
islam and liberalism, 2 peas in a pod. They both believe in silencing those they do not agree with by violence and demonization.
The Bible warns of a coming false religion complete with a false Christ – a person completely opposite of Jesus Christ or more commonly known as the antichrist. Mohammad, by his deeds, was the polar opposite of Jesus and would certainly fit the description of the end times Anti-Christ. The bible warns that the majority of people living in the last days will willingly follow the devil’s false religion and his servant on the Earth. Perhaps liberals like the idea that if Islam replaces Christianity then they will be the new Emirs, Sultans, and Caliphates that can have their harems, openly steal, murder political foes, and rule by edict.
I am relieved, that at my age, I am past the time where I was a naive young kid, fresh out of high school and about to enter University, with a trusting, open mind and a nature that was ready and willing to trust that whatever was taught to me at school, was the truth.
That’s not to say, that when I did go through that age in my life, that the education I received was the pure truth only without any agenda, bias or propaganda inserted. But I feel like today, getting an education on a university campus anywhere in the West is a very different prospect to what it was, 15-20 years ago.
This hate mongering individual is not alone.There are too many just like him, utilizing our tertiary institution’s to spread their agendas, whilst the school’s themselves support this ideological highjacking and brainwashing of today’s kids.
What in the hell, is going to be released from these schools and into the real world, with this kind of babble filling their heads? What kind of adults are going to be churned out from these schools with this kind of dangerous nonsense filling their heads? And how is this going to impact wider society?
One of the major life lesson’s that any successful adult eventually learns, is that you will always see consequences as a result of your actions. Whatever you do – there will always be a reaction from your action. Maybe we need to start looking at making the administrators, faculty staff and educators at these schools, legally accountable in the coming years, for the consequences of turning out these university educated individual’s who have spent tens of thousands of dollars to have their brains filled with unrealistic, hateful rhetoric that does not prepare them for life and for employment, nor does it help our societies as a whole, when we have a generation of these radicalized, entitled dimwits running around, screaming for the same entitlements and ideas that were forcefed into them as ‘normal’ during their university years.
There should be regulations too, within tertiary education, especially given its cost, that ALL sides are viewed in a balanced, factual, informative and truthful way on any topic. Teach these kids to reason, teach them logic and rhetoric. Don’t just power slam one sided information based on emotion and hysteria down their throats, from a base that only operates under one specific political ideology. Its like paying obscene amounts of money to be brainwashed into believing one specific world view, all from an unregulated bunch of people with personal agenda’s. That is terrifying.
There is no proven historic evidence that mohammed, (or jesus or moses for that matter) actually existed. These “imams”, “ayatollahs” and other “priests” of religion live off books of fantasy. Soon there will be written, edicts that those who criticize Gandalf the White shall die. Which will be just as meaningful as those barbarians who live by islam.
Obviouse lies show your moral nature or rather the lack of it, to fit your agenda.
Whilst there is no evidence muhamad ever existed, their is plenty that Jesus Christ did.
Rabid atheists have done much to help islams agenda…. they still cut your heads off though.
@mark. Congratulations. You did an excellent job of posting your comment, particularly as you typed it with both fingers in your ears while chanting “Liar, Liar, Pants on fire”. I am not sure what “facts” you are accusing me of “lying” about but I speculate that it is my dismissal of the fantasy god whom you worship. A few more “lying facts” to back up my argument. The torah, bible and koran were all based on tales generated by people of previous religions used by their “priests” to scare their various audiences into submission. This applies, similarly to the earlier beliefs going back in time. All brought up-to-date depending on the gullible rebellious peasants who needed to be quelled at the time. If you are one of those who need the crutch of a fairy story to keep you going, then I am sad for you and wish you the best of luck.
So your just the common RABID atheist liar then and obviously a troll.
Your kind has done much to assist the agenda of islam, and they are so gratefull for your assistance, they will delight in cutting your head off.
These days there are many who have to ignore everything that prove themselves wrong, in order to think themselves right.
Destable lying cowardly filth.
You are living in a fantasy world. Other than the babble fairy stories there is no ACTUAL evidence of the existence of JC. The Romans used crucifixion as an every day punishment, for example, sometimes used to kill hundreds. There was nothing unique about his death. But, as they say, “You can’t educate pork”. You are entitled to waste your life following your beliefs, the same way that I enjoy my freedom from stone age rules. Take care.
The mere fact that you state things as fact, when in fact they are not, shows your propensity to lie, it shows you dont care about actual facts, that your agenda is more important than facts/truth.
It also shows your willingness to deceive others.
You merely show your weak corrupt lying nature, your ignorance, in fact, also your COWARDICE.
That is all.
crucifixion was a punishment for those rebelling against the Roman occupation. True, it may have been used every day as you say, but it needs to be clarified that it was a method reserved for crimes against the Roman Empire. This fits the idea, advanced by Jewish scholars (who deny the holy nature of Jesus), that Jesus was a Jewish political rebel working to restore the Jewish Kingdom. The failure of that insurrection (when the divine did not come to the rebels’ aid) prompted Paul to question the nature of the Jewish G*d, and instead develop the idea of the Kingdom of Heaven (see Hyam Maccoby’s hypothesis).
Suggest you move to a different site. This isn’t exactly the sort of place people come to attack Western civilization.
To bad Milo wasn’t scheduled to talk at Georgetown about American black slavery not being good for the black slaves, their lack of nuclear family units, where the female slaves were forced breeders for the cotton plantations during Brown’s apology for Muslim slavery and its benefits for the slaves; providing multiple harem slaves as well as slave soldiers for the Sultan, and that banging Sandra Fluke today without her consent under Islam is okay and beneficial as well as charging non-slave infidels such as Sandra a head tax for failing to convert to Islam. Maybe Milo could have touched on the black irony of today’s non-slave Uncle Tom or Aunt Sandra getting whipped by the IRS for their failure to pick and purchase black Barack’s mighty fine plantation health care insurance with higher premiums for reduced benefits; and then whipped some more for failing to pay the Blue Cross government subsidy head tax for the failure to convert to Blue Cross. Na, there would have been riots at Georgetown preventing Milo’s fascist free speech, especially when pointing out that, like those liberated happy little Target shoppers sharing the gender neutral bathrooms, black slaves, regardless of sex, had to pee and crap together in one big communal latrine called the ship’s hold on those Yankee trading vessels during the long voyage of liberation to Washington DC.
The reason why the Left is so obsequious to Islam is that the Left is atheistic, or trying to be. It is against human nature to deny the existence of God. The Left are subconsciously convinced that God does indeed exist, that his name is Allah and that Muhammad is the messenger of God.
Having rejected both Moses and Jesus Christ, they must accept Muhammad.
Posted by SIG-P226, in Breitbart, 2/13/17:
To the Iranian people: we have watched you fill your streets, shouting “Death to America”. Your Revolutionary Guard “threatens” our naval vessels. You scream even more.
That is not the American way. We do not scream, yell, or fill the streets, with the exception of our human garbage.
Our anger is cold, and it is merciless.
Look at the ruins of Germany in 1945. Look at the moonscape of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
When we have heard enough of your mindless hooting, we will destroy you. Completely. Your nation will look like a Martian landscape, and the great Persian people will be nothing but a memory.
True, but that was then. This is Now. If we had the same media during WWI that we now have, we would never have won that/those wars. We would be seeing endless body-bags night after night, even reports that we lost some of the battles, like when Cronkite et al said we lost the Tet offensive when we did not.
We have a much softer citizenry today, they are all about “Emotions” most of who have been brainwashed over the many years since the 40’s.
Just think back to the first Gulf war. Bernard Shaw of CNN(of course) who was in Baghdad at the time of the war and was reporting from the Al Rasheed hotel was later asked this question.” If you had see an ambush being set up by the Iraqis and our troops were walking into it, would you have warned them? He said,” NO, because that was not my job as a reporter”
The Left is sowing the wind. They will one day reap the whirlwind.
“Can’t jive a .45”?
My own personal preference.
I personally find it a disgrace that women have to carry firearms just to walk down the street(although I support their rights 100%).
I look forward to the day when predatory animals are executed in public.
For certain crime sprees………..their relatives should also be killed and their places of residence burned down.
Yeah, the single mothers on lifetime welfare with feral male family members living with them for free and unsupervised have much to answer for.
I agree. Unfortunately, that will never happen.
If it did, and we executed people in the public square, or chopped off fingers for burglaries, whipped people in public, etc, I would guarantee crime would be reduced by 75%.
Right, let’s adopt some of the barbaric 7th century Islamic punishments.
Better idea…..put a parachute on their backs and air drop them from a C130 transport over the Congo
(oops, that’s a comma…)