Islamic State jihadi says mass rapes of non-Muslim women were “normal”, from with comments

In Islamic law, it is normal: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.

A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.

“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

Iraqi Ayatollah Al-Haeri said in April 7, 2016 that a man could offer slave girls to a friend for sex.

The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.

“Captive Islamic State militant says mass rapes were ‘normal,’” by Michael Georgy, Reuters, February 17, 2017:

Islamic State militant Amar Hussein says he reads the Koran all day in his tiny jail cell to become a better person. He also says he raped more than 200 women from Iraqi minorities, and shows few regrets.

Kurdish intelligence authorities gave Reuters rare access to Hussein and another Islamic State militant who were both captured during an assault on the city of Kirkuk in October that killed 99 civilians and members of the security forces. Sixty-three Islamic State militants died.

Hussein said his emirs, or local Islamic State commanders, gave him and others a green light to rape as many Yazidi and other women as they wanted.

“Young men need this,” Hussein told Reuters in an interview after a Kurdish counter-terrorism agent removed a black hood from his head. “This is normal.”

Hussein said he moved from house to house in several Iraqi cities raping women from the Yazidi sect and other minorities at a time when Islamic State was grabbing more and more territory from Iraqi security forces.

Kurdish security officials say they have evidence of Hussein raping and killing but they don’t know what the scale is.

Reuters could not independently verify Hussein’s account.

Witnesses and Iraqi officials say Islamic State fighters raped many Yazidi women after the group rampaged through northern Iraq in 2014. It also abducted many Yazidi women as sex slaves and killed some of their male relatives, they said.

Human rights groups have chronicled widespread abuses by Islamic State against the Yazidis.

Hussein said he also killed about 500 people since joining Islamic State in 2013.

“We shot whoever we needed to shoot and beheaded whoever we needed to beheaded,” said Hussein.

He recalled how emirs trained him to kill, which was difficult at first when one person was brought for a practice kill. It became easier day by day.

“Seven, eight, ten at a time. Thirty or 40 people. We would take them in desert and kill them,” said Hussein, an imposing, well-built figure, who was wearing metal handcuffs.

Eventually, he became highly efficient, never hesitating to kill.

“I would sit them down, put a blindfold on them and fire a bullet into their heads,” he said. “It was normal.”…

“Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel Rahman, mastermind of 1993 World Trade Center jihad bombing, dies
Hugh Fitzgerald: Salat and Zakat in Summerville, South Carolina


  1. john spielman says

    February 18, 2017 at 2:47 pm

    of course rape is normal for ISIS, as ISIS is islam, and muhammed their perfect man was a demon possessed mass murderer thief liar and pedophile pervert!

    ps:and allah is Satan of the Bible

  2. no_one says

    February 18, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    I find it perverted that some people call themselves “scholars”. They are some barbarians that don’t know what scholar means.

  3. warren raymond says

    February 18, 2017 at 3:09 pm

    Whenever you switch on the TV, you get some BS story about the “Rohingya”, the “most persecuted people in the world”. There are constant claims that the Buddhists are raping their women, and that Bangladesh, where they originated, doesn’t want to take them back. But it is not a Buddhist thing to rape and to plunder; knowing what we know we should suspect nothing short of projection.

    Remember when we were inundated with similar stories from Bosnia, where Muslims claimed they were raped by the Christian Serbs? Could it be that we were similarly duped then?

  4. Walter Sieruk says

    February 18, 2017 at 3:09 pm

    First, the brutal vicious receiver of Islamic rapes of girls and women by the ISIS Muslims further exposes the actual malicious strong and demonic anti-female essence of Islam. As for those brutal, cruel and vile ISIS jihadist /Muslims kidnap and rape girls and women using them as sex slaves. This actually started with the founder and prophet of Islam, Muhammad . Who all Muslims look to as an example of how to behave. It’s revealed in the book JESUS AND THE JIHADIS: CONFRONTING THE RAGE OF ISIS by the Christian authors Graig A. Evans and Jeremiah J. Johnson For on page 124 it informs the reader about Muhammad that “he endorsed sex-slavery as a gift from Allah, and enjoyed offering sex-slaves as gifts…” Further on the very next page it also exposes that “Islam has enslaved more people than any other culture.”
    Second , those ISIS jihadist rapes with jihad malice –filled heinously cruel misogyny because their religion is not only anti-female and anti-Christian but it also teaches extreme harshness to all non-Muslims .The Koran as in 9:123. Third, the vicious and murderous jihadists thugs who compose the brutal and deadly jihad entity ISIS are actually putting in to the practice, with all their ruthless actions, the violence and killing that is part of the teaching of the “holy book” of Islam, the Koran. Which contain the doctrine of extreme violent force for the advancement of Islam. As seen in the Koran, for example, 2:191. 4:89. 5:33. 9:5,111,123. 47:4. So in spite of the strong denials by many, ISIS is an actual Islamic organization. Likewise the malicious, bloodthirsty violence jihadists who make up ISIS are real Muslims. Nevertheless, there are some who might , understandably, wonder and then ask “Just how can those jihadists of ISIS ,being so very religious , also at the time also be so very malice-filled ,unfeeling and deadly ? “ The answer to that question is found in the Bible. For the Bible teaches that there are some people who are extremely heartless, cold, callous and dangerous because they have had “their conscience seared with a hot iron.” First Timothy 4:2. [ K.J.V.] In this case of the members of ISIS this “hot iron” is Islam.

  5. somehistory says

    February 18, 2017 at 4:04 pm

    hussein….someone else has that name too. No good comes from people with that name, and no admitting to wrongdoing except to brag about it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Islamic State jihadi says mass rapes of non-Muslim women were “normal”, from with comments

  1. θ says:

    “Madmanna says: In Islamic law, it is normal: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an.”

    Qur’an makes it normally impossible for the normal Moslem men to have any non-marital sex with the female slaves per Q.24, v.32 as the slaves have to be protected by their marriage. On other hands for the Non Moslems it is also normal to not obey Qur’an they don’t believe in. In Christianity a debtor himself has to be sold altogether with his wife and his daughters, but in the Torah a debtor can spare himself and his wife by just selling his daughters. In Joel 3:8 even God acts as a main player for the human trafficking.
    Q.24, v.32 And marry the unmarried among you and the righteous among your male slaves and female slaves. If they should be poor, Allah will enrich them from His bounty, and Allah is all-Encompassing and Knowing.
    Mt 18:25
    But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.
    Exo 21:7
    And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do.
    Joel 3:8
    And I will sell your sons and your daughters into the hand of the children of Judah, and they shall sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off: for the LORD hath spoken it.

    “The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). ”

    Conjunction “And” in Q.33, v.50 is exclusive for Prophet Muhammad only. For the ordinary Moslems, Qur’an consistently use otherwise the conjunction “Or” per Q.4, v.3, Q.4, v.24, and Q.23, v.6.

  2. θ says:

    Qur’an forbids any free man, slave owner, and male slave from defiling himself in sexual conduct with any slave or free woman outside marriage. Only thru marriage a man can legitimately cohabit female slaves or free women.
    Q.24, v.33. And let be abstained [from any sex cohabitation] those who find not any marriage until Allah enriches them from His bounty.

  3. θ says:

    Qur’an makes exception for the Moslem men and slaveholders to marry the female slaves per Q.4, v.24, but forbids them from defiling any female slave who wants to secure her chastity (Tuhassunna) per Q.24, v.33.
    Q.4, v.24 And (forbidden to be married) the secured ones from the free women except those whom your right hands possess as Allah’s ordinance to you.
    Q.24, v.33 …And do not force your female slaves into the rape, whereas they demand to secure the chastity.

    In Q.24, v.33 Qur’an plainly forbids any compulsion to cohabit the female slaves (either in the forms of prostitution or marriage or concubinage) because basically a compulsory sex must be a rape.

    An-Nisa means the free women per Q.4, v.3.
    Malakat Ayman means the female slave per Q.4, v.3.
    Muhsanat means the secured one. Similar context with the same root of word appears on Q.24, v.33 (female slaves wanting a securing chastity), Q.59, v.14 (walls securing a town), Q.21, v.80 (armors securing a soldier), Q.12, v.48 (savings that secure a saver during long recession).

  4. θ says:

    The Jewish and Christian apologists used to argue that a Biblical permission to do genocide, expulsion, even rape the women, is restrictively approved around the “Promised land” only. If so, they concur with a sickening idea of raping the Judah’s women and their daughters by the hordes of Gentile men (such as Arabs) under arrangement and approval of their God?
    Zech 14:2
    For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.

    How come the Jewish and Christian apologists argue against the rapeing of female slaves by the Arabs if their God himself participates in managing a lucrative business of human trafficking and Slave Market, even unbelievably gives a sickening approval of ravishing his own chosen women by the Gentiles?
    Whose God is he anyway?
    Joel 3:8
    And I will sell your sons and your daughters into the hand of the children of Judah, and they shall sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off: for the LORD hath spoken it.

  5. θ says:

    Jewish and Christian apologists would like to mention the Moslem’s legitimate marriage and Azl with the female slaves of Awtas and Mustaliq, but they forget how they have a far worse sickening idea of their God’s approval of ravishing the Judah’s women (at time of Zechariah), and a far worse illicit business run by their Biblical God himself on the Southern Lebanese women of Tyre and Zidon (at time of Joel).

  6. θ says:

    Now the question is, how many free women or female slaves can a Moslem man marry? In terms of marriage, only Four *wives* at most – either from free ones or from slaves – are permitted.

    Getting a woman’s consent is essential in Islamic matrimony, and somewhat a man can be compelled by a familial pressure of the wife’s household to maintain a strict Monogamy with her.

    Q.4, v.3 And if ye feared that ye won’t be just with the orphan girls, then marry those that ye get consent of the free women, two or three or four. But if ye [get pressured] fear that you won’t be just, then marry only one or those your right hand possesses. That is more suitable that ye may not deprive.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.