The West’s Real Bigotry: Rejecting Persecuted Christians, a post from the Gatestone Institute

Finally, after years of apathy and inaction, Washington is extending a much-needed helping hand to Middle Eastern Christians. U.S. President Donald Trump recently announced that persecuted Christians will be given priority when it comes to applying for refugee status in the United States.

Christians and Yazidis are being exposed to genocide at the hands of ISIS and other Islamist groups, who have engaged in a massive campaign to enslave the remnant non-Muslim minorities and to destroy their cultural heritage.

The scholar Hannibal Travis wrote in 2006:

“Unfortunately, the West has rejected the idea of solidarity with the Christians of the Middle East, prioritizing diplomacy based on oil interests and the Arab-Israeli conflict. Thus, the United States, Britain, and France have largely ignored the persecutions of the Christians of Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, and Sudan, while rushing to save the oil-rich Muslim states of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, as well as besieged minority Kurds, Bosnians, and Kosovars. To this day, American troops in Iraq reportedly do not always intervene against the persecution of Christians, perhaps not wanting to be seen as ‘siding with the Christians’ and thus provoke retaliation.”

Then, the so-called liberals in the West — and even Christians — started pushing back against the move.

Indigenous Christians in Iraq and Syria have not only been exposed to genocide at the hands of the Islamic State (ISIS) and other Islamist groups but also their applications for immigration to Western countries have been put on the back burner by, shamefully but not surprisingly, the UN.

A group of Armenians from Iraq, for example, have fled their homes in Iraq after ISIS came. Instead they have gone to Yozgat, Turkey. The newspaper Agos ran a story about them on 21 December, 2015:

“They live in hard conditions. The UN could not schedule any appointment for immigration application before 2022. They don’t know how they can live in these conditions for 7 years. The only thing they want is to meet with their relatives.”

Yozgat, one of the Anatolian cities where Armenians were exposed to the most horrific murders and exile at the hands of Muslims during the 1915 genocide, is where Armenians find themselves again, this time struggling to survive in the midst of unemployment, poverty, harassment, intolerance, and illness.

Şant Garabedyan, 23, said that no jobs are given to Christians:

“I have been in Yozgat for two months. We are eight people in the same house…. Nobody hires me, because I am a Christian. My wife is Chaldean and doesn’t wear her pectoral cross because she is afraid.”

Alis Şalcıyan said that they left Iraq fearing ISIS.

“We have been here for a year. Back in Baghdad, we felt frightened, when ISIS came to Iraq…. Someone on the street saw my necklace and spat while looking into my eyes. After that, I took it off and kept it at home…. We filed an immigration application with the UN, but they scheduled an appointment for 2022, although they scheduled appointments for the next year for others. We must wait here for seven years.”

Ğazar Setrakyan said that they left Baghdad the night ISIS came to the city: “When ISIS militants came to Baghdad, they wrote ‘house of Christians’ on our door. It was impossible to stay there. We left our home and three shops, and we ran away.”

Lusin Sarkisyan said that her son, who had worked for Americans in Iraq, was targeted by ISIS. “One day, ISIS militants threatened my son saying that they would kill his family if he continues to work with Americans. We had to run away.”

Sarkisyan added that the UN officials scheduled an appointment for an immigration application for 2018. “I do not know what we are going to do until then.”

Even when European states take in Christian refugees, they fail to protect them from the attacks of Muslims in refugee housing facilities.

According to the findings of a survey from the Christian advocacy group Open Doors USA, refugees of Christian and Yazidi descent who fled persecution in places like Syria and Iraq keep facing other religiously motivated attacks in Germany.

Since February 2016, nearly 800 Christians and Yazidi refugees were attacked by others at the relief centers and camps, according to a report entitled, “Lack of protection for religious minorities in Germany” conducted from 15 February to 30 September, 2016.

“When questioned about the nature of the attacks, assault was named most often, followed by death threats, either directed directly at the Christian refugees or their family in Germany or in their home countries.

“44 people indicated that they had been victims of sexual assaults. Other forms of persecution include insults, general threats, and physical attacks that had not been defined as an assault. 11% of those questioned felt intimidated by loud music/prayers.”

Representatives of the NGO Open Doors, along with other NGOs, held a press conference in May 2016 to present an earlier report: “Religiously Motivated Attacks on Christian Refugees in Germany.”

According to the testimony of a male refugee from Iraq, he received death threats after Muslims saw that he was reading the Bible:

“They wanted me to convert back to Islam. The manager of the facility said that he is helpless and cannot protect me. As I feared for my life, I then reported it to a social worker who then wrote a report. The death threats increased. The interpreter tried to trivialize the threats and conceal them from the social welfare department. The department instructed the facility management to make more of an effort to ensure my safety. They were incapable of doing so and therefore I was moved into other accommodation.”

“Muslims said,” a refugee from Iran revealed, “that ‘Islam allows us to spill your blood’, ‘Your breath and your clothes are impure’.”

A female refugee from Iran stated:

“In the beginning they were all good to us. They then realized that I am a Christian. They took the dirty water they used to clean with and emptied it over us from the top floor…. I don’t know what happened after that anymore. […] To this day [17 days later] my statement has still not been recorded.”

Yazidis, who are a persecuted and indigenous religious minority in the Middle East, are also exposed to assaults and discrimination, according to the report.

“Of the 10 Yezidi refugees three of them received death threats, two experienced sexual harassment and five suffered other forms of persecution; six reported that these occurrences took place numerous times. In three cases the perpetrators were fellow refugees and in three further cases the security staffs’ relatives were the perpetrators. Five of the victims did not report anything because they deemed it useless.”

Staff members in the refugee facilities are also involved in the discrimination. Nearly a third of the respondents said that most of the discrimination and violence came mostly from refugee-center guards of Muslim descent. According to the report:

“In the case of conflict, a large amount of the Muslim staff show their solidarity towards fellow Muslims, obstruct or trivialize the complaints. Interpreters influence the outcome of the asylum procedures in an unlawful way and sometimes they are even actively involved in the discrimination inside the facilities.”

A Christian from Iran said: “I had a problem and reported it at the Info point again and again. There is someone there that always insults our mothers and sister. He said we are ‘neciz’ [impure].”

“The security service staff are all Arabs and they only help the Arabs,” said a Christian from Eritrea. “Whenever somebody does something wrong in the accommodation, they say: ‘It was the Christians’ even if we had done nothing.”

Only in the rarest cases would the aggrieved actually file a complaint (17% / 129 people) to the police, according to the report.

“If you include the reports and complaints presented to the facility management, then only 28% (213) sought the protection of the German authorities. 54% of those questioned (399) gave specific reasons for not filing any complaints: 48% of them were afraid, especially for fear of repeated attacks or that the situation would even get worse (36%). Other reasons were that there were no safe opportunities to contact or communicate with the police or the respective authorities because of language barriers (14%) and the impression that the report would be pointless anyhow.”

In other European states — including Austria, Switzerland, France, United Kingdom, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, and Greece — Christian and Yazidi refugees are also exposed to attacks at the hands of refugees of Muslim descent.

The German government is also rejecting applications for asylum of Christian refugees and deporting them unfairly, according to a German pastor.

Dr. Gottfried Martens, a pastor at Trinity Lutheran Church in Berlin, reported that the German government is rejecting almost all applications for asylum from most of his church’s Iranian and Afghan refugee members, who have waited years in Germany for the government to hear their cases, according to CBN News.

Melkite Greek Catholic archbishop of Aleppo, Jean-Clément Jeanbart, said in an interview:

“The egoism and the interests slavishly defended by your governments will in the end kill you, as well. Open your eyes. Didn’t you see what happened recently in Paris?”

Apparently, they did not. They still seem to live in denial. According to the U.S. government figures, of the almost 11,000 Syrian refugees admitted to the United States in fiscal 2016, only 56 were Christian.

When one brings up the issue of Western states taking in Muslim migrants from Syria and Iraq without vetting them for jihadist ties, while leaving behind the Christian and Yazidi victims of jihadists, one is accused of being “bigoted” or “racist”. But the real bigotry is abandoning the persecuted and benign Middle Eastern Christians and Yazidis, the main victims of the ongoing genocides in Syria and Iraq.

It is true that Shia Muslims and even some Sunni Muslims — particularly secular, non-observant or moderate ones — are also threatened by the Islamic State. But ISIS and other Islamist organizations are not trying to destroy Islam and Muslims. On the contrary, they aim to further institutionalize Islam and even expand Islamic influence to other lands and establish a Caliphate (Islamic empire) based on Islamic scriptures.

Helping religious minorities in the Muslim world is not just a humanitarian issue, but also a political issue of vital importance to the West. Some people might think that the U.S. or the West should not get engaged in Middle Eastern politics.

But if the West continues turning a blind eye to the Islamic radicalization of the Middle East and North Africa, what does it expect will happen to it?

As long as Islamists keep winning “victories” across nations and as long as Christians and other non-Muslims continue to be exterminated, Islamists will gain more power and courage to expand to Europe and other parts of the world.

Radical Islamic ideology never stops where it takes over. It is a genocidal, imperialistic and colonialist ideology. It aims to murder or subjugate all non-Muslims under its rule. Islamic jihad started in the 7th century, in the Arabian Peninsula. Then through massacres and social pressure, including the jizya tax and the institution of dhimmitude, it expanded to three continents — Asia, Africa and Europe — and persecuted countless indigenous peoples.

It seems that one of the most effective ways to stop this pattern is to support Christians and other non-Muslims in the Middle East. The West would not only gain a significant ally in the Middle East, but also the political, military, and economic influence of Islamists will be weakened.

Western countries should welcome Christians and Yazidis — the main targets of genocide — to the West immediately, and also consider ways to empower them in their native lands, such as by creating safe havens for them. It is high time that not only the U.S. but all other Western governments finally saw that the Christians in the Middle East are them.

Uzay Bulut, a journalist born and raised a Muslim in Turkey, is currently based in Washington D.C.

© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The West’s Real Bigotry: Rejecting Persecuted Christians, a post from the Gatestone Institute

  1. θ says:

    The American acceptance of the Christian refugees emboldens the Dar al Harb agenda of totally uprooting the Non Moslems as many as possible from any traces of their historical homeland in Middle East, whereas the European rejection of the Christian refugees is in accordance to the Islamic concept of Mu’ahid (covenanted folks).
    The more the Christian refugees flee away and live in America, the more the Middle Eastern Christianity gets defaced from History.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Solution should have been a creation of the buffer zone or safety zone for the minority refugees at the region of conflict, but alas, who gonna protect them? A peace-loving non-violent Evangelical?
    Cleansing the Middle East of entire Christianity history by accepting the Christian refugees in America is something the Americans have not realised about.

  3. madmanna says:

    Muslims are not protecting them that’s for sure.

  4. Anonymous says:

    “madmanna says: Muslims are not protecting them that’s for sure.”

    I think they are spared as long as possible on purpose to pay taxes like a cash cow, or forced as a scapegoat for the dirty business, corruption and money laundering.

    Why don’t the poor Christian minorities rely on their Evangelical fellows instead, for military protection in the Middle East? Well, as adage of the Gospels say, a blind one just leads other blind ones to the ditch. They don’t want to give Jesus a bad name “Jihadist Christ” do they?

  5. Anonymous says:

    I think the Evangelicals and Islamophobes work for a radical cause for free by pitting a vulnerable poor Christian minorities against the Moslems.
    Evangelicals should have gained a mutual respect from the Moslem communities if they choose a way of standing side-by-side with them to embolden the tolerant version of Islam. Not otherwise, which in turn pits the weak Christian minorities and Moslems each others for the radical’s pleasures.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Other definition of Golden Rule: If you are nonviolent, you should expect the others to be as nonviolent as you, even if necessary to make them so.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Accusing Islam of being the satanic faith is quite ridiculous, unproductive and flawed since the Bible attests demons too believed in the Sonship of Jesus.

    The teaching of Love is a good common ground, and it is undeniably compelling. Love is everywhere.
    Lk 6
    32 For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.33 And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.

    If the teaching of Love is truly compelling, nobody could be void of it.
    Mt 5:14
    Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Just as not everyone is Jesus’ sheep (the elect) hearing his voice, also not every strange sheep is a devouring wolf.
    Fundamentalist Christians who prone or incline to a zero-sum game can’t cope with the idea of a compromise of “not his sheep not wolf”.

  9. Anonymous says:

    For what shall it profit the minorities, if they shall live as refugees in America, but lose their own Christianity History in Middle East?

  10. madmanna says:

    Muslims often conflate the actions of the individual and the state as if they are both subject to the same laws. This is misleading and confusing.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Concerning Islamic Prophet, there are several issues that actually give a backlash, a doubt, even disprove Jesus’ claim instead.
    (i) From the Tanach’s descriptions of what a Prophet is, Jesus could be disqualified from being a Prophet simply because he wholly replaces the Tanach penal code with his pacifist ethics.

    That’s ironic that his teachings of placing the nonviolence to correct the Law, Priesthood, holidays, ceremonies, penal code, even the familial rulings is a main reason why Jesus can’t be Prophet in accordance to the Tanach.

    (ii) Jews do believe in the Gentile Prophets.
    Jesus’ negation “salvation is of Jews” just shows a sheer ignorance of what the Jews from generation to generation have believed in. It casts a doubt of what he knows of the same equal salvation brought by both the Gentiles and Jewish Messengers.

    (iii) It is wrong for the Christian apologists to examine a Prophethood from the nonviolent character of Jesus.
    The term of Prophet – if Christians really judge honestly – should be defined by the actions that have been started by many violent characters of the Tanach, started by Moses, Joshua, David, Solomon, and Elijah.
    Compared to the major Prophets of the Tanach, actually Jesus’ character is rather an anomaly, not a norms, for a Prophet.

    (iv) It is wrong for the Christian apologists to examine a Prophethood from the miracles Jesus performed, let alone from his claim “Son of God”.
    The term of Prophet – if Christians really judge honestly – should also be defined by a ministry shown by John without having to perform any wonder whatsoever.
    Compared to the major Prophets of the Tanach, actually Jesus’ claim of Sonship is truly “abnormal” for a Prophet.

  12. Anonymous says:

    There are theological issues that potentially disprove Jesus’ Prophethood by using the main claims used by the Christians.
    (i) By casting back the notorious Christian’s reference to Isaiah 53 – that is within the Tanach – the Jews were easily pointing out that the idea of Suffering Servant (Lamb of God) is just grafted nicely into the Tanach without having to replacing it with a Vicarious Atonement.

    In other words, if Jesus were really that servant, it is quite wrong for him to teach a replacement of the Moses’ Law, Levite rites, Priesthood, holidays, ceremonies, penal code, even the familial rulings with his nonviolence.
    If Isaiah were to mean Jesus’ atonement in Isaiah 53, Isaiah doesn’t indicate any replacement of the Moses’ Law by his death.

    (ii) By casting back the notorious Christian’s reference to Psalm 2:7 on coronation of David, the Jews were easily pointing out that the idea of “Son of God” is just a figurative veneration to the human nature of David.
    Hence, if David were to mean Jesus’ coronation in Psalm 2:7, why don’t the Trinitarians believe in the divinity of human nature of Jesus?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s