Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything,” Answers 16-23, with comments, from JihadWatch.org

Recently I offered 38 questions to ask those carrying signs proclaiming, “I’m A Muslim — Ask Me Anything.” Here are answers to questions sixteen through twenty-three.

16. This question again underscores the harsh treatment of critics of Muhammad raised in the previous question. When he was asked about Abu Afak, Muhammad is reported in a hadith as saying: “Who will rid me of this pestilent fellow?” — which is what one of his loyal followers promptly did, stabbing Abu Afak to death. There is no direct quote from Muhammad after the killing, unlike the report of his exclamation after the killing of Asma bint Marwan, but it is safe to assume that if the person he called a “pestilent fellow” was gotten rid of, Muhammad was well satisfied. You want to make sure your listeners learn of these political murders carried out by followers of Muhammad to please him, as they are constantly barraged with propaganda — see any Muslim website — as to Muhammad’s “kind and gentle nature,” and his teaching of “love, kindness, and compassion.” You beg to differ, and so do the ghosts of Asma bint Marwan and Abu Afak.

17. An impossible question for the M.I. to answer. If he doesn’t answer at all, he will look bad. If he claims there are “so many different views expressed in the Qur’an and Hadith,” but “on the whole the Qur’an is deeply respectful of Christians and Jews” – “Moses and Jesus, after all, are considered to be prophets in Islam” — he will look bad once you respond by quoting Qur’an 98:6, where Christians and Jews are called “the most vile of created beings.” That will make a deep impression on the onlookers who, never forget, are your real audience.

18. Not quite so impossible a question as #17, but it should provide a salutary shock for onlookers to discover that the Qur’an describes Muslims as the “best of peoples” (3:110), especially after having just learned that they themselves, the non-Muslims listening to your exchange with that“Ask-Me-Anything” Muslim, are described in no uncertain terms in the Qur’an as “the most vile of created beings.” There is no possible way for the M.I. to put an exculpatory spin on either 98:6 or 3:110.

19. While Islam makes universalist claims, it is in fact a vehicle for Arab supremacism. Muslims must turn toward Arabia – the Hejaz – five times a day in prayer, must ideally read the Qur’an in Arabic, should model their behavior on that of Muhammad, and also in some cases on that of his Companions. The way of life that is normative in Islam is thus based on the teachings and practices of a 7th century Arab.
While taking an Arabic name is not required of converts, it is a longstanding practice, a way to slough off a previous, non-Islamic identity, and to express disdain for one’s previous life as an Infidel, while signalling a complete embrace of this new Islamic identity. The mass adoption of Arab names is prompted by, and in turn further promotes, the belief among Muslims that an Arab identity is superior to a non-Arab one. The M.I. will have difficulty deflecting attention from this matter, much less deny it altogether, as there are so many well-known examples (Adam Gadahn becomes Azzam al-Amriki, Cat Stevens becomes Yusuf Islam, Cassius Clay becomes Muhammad Ali). This business of name-changing is one more example of Islam as a vehicle for Arab supremacism, a theme you want to keep hammering home, to the great and well-deserved discomfort of your Ask-Me-Anything Muslim interlocutor.

20. This question is meant to raise the matter of the many contradictions in the Qur’anic text. Muslim scholars, having to reconcile these contradictions, came up with the doctrine of “abrogation” or naskh, in which later passages are said to “abrogate” earlier ones. The main internal contradictions in the Qur’an are between the later ones, identified as coming from the period when Muhammad was in Medina (hence called “the Medinan verses”) which are much harsher than the earlier ones from his time in Mecca (“the Meccan verses”). Why does this matter? It means that those milder verses that Muslim apologists tend to quote are often those earlier verses that have been abrogated by the later more unyielding Medinan verses, but the listeners are blissfully unaware of this, and assume that the milder abrogated verses are still valid. You must clearly explain how naskh applies, and give an example of verses that have been abrogated, and by what later verses. The Verse of the Sword, Qur’an 9:5, abrogated many earlier less violent verses. You can find them listed here. Muslim apologists, of course, will quote the abrogated verses as if they are still valid, in an attempt to give non-Muslims a false view of the Qur’an and of Islam.

21. This is to raise the matter of misogyny in Islam. Assuming that the M.I. will either deny that Muslim men are allowed to beat their wives, or will claim (falsely) that they can do so, but only “lightly,” you should be ready to respond with Qur’an 4:34: “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.” Contemporary translations sometimes water down the word “beat,” but it is the same one used in verse 8:12 and clearly means “to strike.”

22. The Muslim heaven, Jannah, is described in the Qur’an and hadith in great and loving detail as an material paradise, with gardens of bliss, endless and delicious food that is forever fresh and can never rot, flagons of pure water and other drinks, fruit without thorns, fountains scented with camphor or ginger, and “maidens restraining their glances.” You get the picture – the Muslims are promised a very different sort of paradise from the spiritual one of Christianity, and let’s not forget the many fabled dark-eyed virgins available to service each Muslim man (contrary to popular belief, the number of houris is specified as 72 only in one hadith collection, Sunan al-Tirmidhi). The important point to be made is the stark contrast between the spirituality of Christianity’s heaven and the thoroughly material heaven promised to Muslims.

23. This question is meant to raise the horrific business of “honor killings,” in which a Muslim father can kill his daughter without facing any punishment in an Islamic society. M.I. will deny that the father can escape punishment. But you should be ready with the following: The authority for allowing the father to kill his daughter is Umdat al-Salik or Reliance of the Traveller, a manual of Islamic law, certified in 1991 as a reliable guide to Sunni Islam by Muslim Council of Cairo’s al-Azhar University. This 14th-century law-manual states that punishment or “retaliation is obligatory against anyone, who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right,” EXCEPT when “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers)” kills their “offspring, or offspring’s offspring” (section o1.1-2). In other words, when a parent, murders his/her child for the sake of honor, this is not a crime under Islamic law. You can also have at the ready a few examples of such “honor” killings where the father got off scot-free. You can also, if you wish, give a few recent examples of honor killings that went unpunished, to show that this is a continuing problem. For example, in 2008, a woman was killed in Saudi Arabia by her father for “chatting” with a man on Facebook. “The killing became public only when a Saudi cleric referred to the case, to criticize Facebook for the strife it caused.” Or in 2013 in Yemen, a “15-year-old girl was killed by her father, who burned her to death, because she talked to her fiancé.’ That should be enough to leave onlookers aghast.

Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything,” Answers 11-15

COMMENTS

  1. mortimer says

    February 4, 2017 at 2:03 pm

    QUESTIONS ABOUT ISLAM FOR THINKING MUSLIMS

    1. Why does Allah want His believers to kill kufaar for Him, rob, rape and enslave them? Why did Allah not teach Muslims to observe the Golden Rule? Why are Muslims alone in rejecting: ‘Love your neighbours’?

    2. Why did Allah not refrain from creating kufaar if He first deceives them so they will not believe? Did Allah create the kufaar so he might torment them as an amusement?

    3. Why can’t Allah kill the kufaar Himself? If Allah is so helpless, then does he exist?

    4. Why can’t Allah create females the way He wants them instead of making them half as intelligent and half as religious as men?

    5. Why does Allah keep giving women clitorises, if they should be sliced off?

    6. Why did Allah not reveal adult monogamy, instead of revealing child marriage, multiple marriages and sex slaves? Is pedophilia good for children?

    7. Why does Allah need to tempt believers by promising them eternal sex with slaves in paradise? Is owning slaves the meaning of your life?

    8. Why does Allah need slaves?

    9. Why did Allah deceive everyone when He saved Jesus Christ from crucifixion?

    10. Why did Allah let Christianity form and grow in spite of His divine deception of the followers of Jesus, without stopping it RIGHT AWAY before doing so much ,damage,? Why did Allah allow Christianity to have MORE ADHERENTS than Islam and DOMINATE Muslims?

  2. Roger the cabin boy says

    February 4, 2017 at 2:03 pm

    Why would I even want to talk to some Islamic nut case standing there wth a sign
    Idiots
    I must thank Robert for wading through all this Islamic writing
    I have never looked at the Koran or had any desire to
    So I am grateful some one has done it
    Now that I know what is in there I want even less to do with these guys

  3. Walter Sieruk says

    February 4, 2017 at 3:19 pm

    As this above article starts out with the quote “I’m a Muslim -ask me anything” Well that statement may be true for quite a number of Muslims when speaking to non-Muslims living in the West.. Nevertheless, when such a Muslims are asked a question the answer given to that person who is a non-Muslim may speak the truth or lie .As in giving a total falsehood of an answer.. This ,of course , depends of the question being asked.
    This involves the Islamic doctrine that is called Taqiyya . This is the Islamic dogma that lying and deception is a good thing for a Muslim to do as long as it’s done fro the advancement of Islam.
    In other words, according to Taqiyya a Muslim may,indeed, blatantly lie to a non-Muslim to further the cause of Islam
    .

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Hugh Fitzgerald: “I’m a Muslim — Ask Me Anything,” Answers 16-23, with comments, from JihadWatch.org

  1. θ says:

    “16. There is no direct quote from Muhammad after the killing, unlike the report of his exclamation after the killing of Asma bint Marwan, but it is safe to assume that if the person he called a “pestilent fellow” was gotten rid of, Muhammad was well satisfied. ”

    Asma bint Marwan is not a Jewish but ironically an Arab Ummayad whose clans waged a war against Moslems at Badr.
    Umayyad family and Prophet Muhammad both descended from a common ancestor, Abd Manaf ibn Qusai, and they originally came from the city of Mecca.
    Prophet Muhammad descended from Abd Manaf via his son Hashim, while the Umayyads descended from Abd Manaf via a different son, Abd-Shams, whose son was Umayya.
    The two families are therefore considered to be two different clans (those of Hashim and of Umayya, respectively) but of the same tribe (that of the Quraish).

    “17. Qur’an 98:6, where Christians and Jews are called “the most vile of created beings.” ”

    The structure of Qur’an passage tells that the word “Sharr ul-Bariya” (evil creation) is a term for specific groups of them who eternally reside in the Hell.

    “18. the Qur’an describes Muslims as the “best of peoples” (3:110), ”

    Yes, but for whom? For all humanbeings and their benefits.

    “19. Muslims must turn toward Arabia – the Hejaz – five times a day in prayer, must ideally read the Qur’an in Arabic, should model their behavior on that of Muhammad, and also in some cases on that of his Companions. The way of life that is normative in Islam is thus based on the teachings and practices of a 7th century Arab.”

    Yes, it gives a way to equate Islamophobia as a racism. Isn’t the West considering the racism as the unforgivable crime?
    If so, why don’t we Moslems utilise it for our benefits as well?

    “20. The Verse of the Sword, Qur’an 9:5, abrogated many earlier less violent verses. ”

    Only stupid radicals might insist on a myth of Abrogation.
    The verse Q.9, v.5 doesn’t abrogate nor replace the rightful proselytism to Islam for the heathens. Q.9, v.5 is not absolute, doesn’t abrogate other peaceful verses either, even it is made limited by other fighting verse, namely Q.9, v.12.
    The Caliph Umar destroys Persia but spares the Yazidis (as well as Eastern Africans) not in accordance to Q.9, v.5 but on the pretext of Q.9, v.12 that permits a selective assassination of the “heads of snakes” (Aimat alKufr).
    Q.9, v.12 And if they break their oaths after their treaty and insult your religion, then fight the leaders of disbelief, for indeed, there are no oaths to them; so that they might restrain.
    Tabari, History, Volume IX
    ‘Urwah then embraced Islam and asked the Prophet that he might return to his people as a Muslim. The Messenger of God said, so his folk report, “They will fight you,” for the Messenger of God knew the proud spirit of resistance that was in them. Urwah responded: “O Messenger of God, I am dearer to them than their firstborn.” He was indeed loved and obeyed by his people, so he went out summoning his people to Islam and hoping that they would not oppose him because of his position among them.When he appeared above them on his upper balcony, after having already summoned them to Islam and announcing to them his [new] religion, they shot arrows at him from every direction. One arrow struck [Urwah] and killed him. The Banu Malik allege that one of their men, whose name was Aws b. ‘Awf, brother of the Banu Salim b. Malik, killed him. But the Ahlaf allege that one of their men called Wahb b. Jabir from the Banu ‘Attab b. Malik killed him. Urwah was asked, “What do you think about your blood [being shed]?” He replied: “It is an honor which God has bestowed on me and [an act of] martyrdom to which God has led me. I am only like the martyrs killed with the Messenger of God before he departed from you; so bury me with them.” They did so and allege that the Messenger of God said about him that he was among his [own] folk like Ya Sin was among his. In this year, the deputation of the people of al-Ta’if came to the Messenger of God. It is said that they came in the month of Ramadan [December 12, 630-January 631].

    “21. Contemporary translations sometimes water down the word “beat,” but it is the same one used in verse 8:12 and clearly means “to strike.” ”

    The context of Q.4, v.34 is made fully understandable by the Hadith that tells a very specific context of adultery.
    Ibn Majah, Vol.3, Book 9, Hadith 1851.
    Prophet said: You have no right to treat them otherwise, unless they commit clear indecency (Fahisha Mubina). If they do that, then forsake them in their beds and hit them, but without causing injury or leaving a mark, if they obey you, then do not seek means of annoyance against them.

    That’s why there’s a Hadith about poking a traitorous wife, in a strict and specific case of clear or daring indecency – that is, allowing other rival of her husband to step on her husband’s mat – but not for other common occasions at home, such as quarreling one another.
    Ibn Kathir, Tafsir.
    Prophet said: You have the right on them that they do not allow any person whom you dislike to step on your mat. However, if they do that, you are allowed to discipline them lightly.

    “22. let’s not forget the many fabled dark-eyed virgins available to service each Muslim man (contrary to popular belief, the number of houris is specified as 72 only in one hadith collection, Sunan al-Tirmidhi). The important point to be made is the stark contrast between the spirituality of Christianity’s heaven and the thoroughly material heaven promised to Muslims.”

    That’s normal.
    What is abnormal is, the Lamb shall be “bridegroom” for the celibate men who never gets defiled by women. That’s a proof that the celibacy may lead to a worse perversion of Homosexuality.

    “23. The authority for allowing the father to kill his daughter is Umdat al-Salik or Reliance of the Traveller, a manual of Islamic law, certified in 1991 as a reliable guide to Sunni Islam by Muslim Council of Cairo’s al-Azhar University. This 14th-century law-manual states that punishment or “retaliation is obligatory against anyone, who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right,” EXCEPT when “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers)” kills their “offspring, or offspring’s offspring” (section o1.1-2). ”

    Apparently the author of Umdat al-Salik mistakenly makes emotional “opinion” against Q.60, v.12, Q.81, v.8, Q.17, v.31. But that’s just a man’s opinion nothing less or more.

  2. Rubart Subinsar says:

    “The M.I. will have difficulty deflecting attention from this matter, much less deny it altogether, as there are so many well-known examples (Adam Gadahn becomes Azzam al-Amriki, Cat Stevens becomes Yusuf Islam, Cassius Clay becomes Muhammad Ali). This business of name-changing is one more example of Islam as a vehicle for Arab supremacism, a theme you want to keep hammering home, to the great and well-deserved discomfort of your Ask-Me-Anything Muslim interlocutor.”

    What race is Islam again?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s