Under Sharia law the life of a murderer may be saved by a ransom payment. This is forbidden in the law of Moses

Numbers 35 v 31 Moreover ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer, which is guilty of death: but he shall be surely put to death. 32 And ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge, that he should come again to dwell in the land, until the death of the priest. 33 So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it. 34 Defile not therefore the land which ye shall inhabit, wherein I dwell: for I the LORD dwell among the children of Israel.

If a Muslim murderer offers the family of the victim a payment and they accept it he is free. A Muslim who murders a non-Muslim cannot be put to death. The family of the victim must accept a payment of reparation or the imprisonment of the murderer.

Sharia law always discriminates against the non-Muslim. Unequal weights are the foundation of Sharia.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Under Sharia law the life of a murderer may be saved by a ransom payment. This is forbidden in the law of Moses

  1. θ says:

    The Torah also has another type of “discrimination”, that if the unintentional killer leaves the borders of his refugee place, suddenly he is counted as an “intentional murderer”.

    Diyat is the dispensation in the form of blood money for the case of mistaken murder. The Torah’s version of judicial dispensation – in the case of “unintentional murder” – is a temporary life like fugitive in a refugee camp afar from the city or town.
    In Islam, the amount of money has the main factor. In the Torah, the territorial borders of the refugee camp has a life-or-death role.

    When a Jew mistakenly kills, he can’t offer any blood money whatsoever, but rather runs for his life into a refugee camp, and he could live secured like a fugitive there. Thus, the High Priest has to announce in-absentia that the case is indeed “unintentional killing” on purpose to make the killer safe in a refugee camp, being secured from any effort of the blood avengers until the time when High Priest of the court dies (i.e. case closed), so that the fugitive can be allowed to return safely back to his hometown.
    Nevertheless, if the killer left his refugee place, suddenly he is counted as an “intentional murderer”.
    Num 35
    24 Then the congregation shall judge between the slayer and the revenger of blood according to these judgments:25 And the congregation shall deliver the slayer out of the hand of the revenger of blood, and the congregation shall restore him to the city of his refuge, whither he was fled: and he shall abide in it unto the death of the high priest, which was anointed with the holy oil.26 But if the slayer shall at any time come without the border of the city of his refuge, whither he was fled;27 And the revenger of blood find him without the borders of the city of his refuge, and the revenger of blood kill the slayer; he shall not be guilty of blood:28 Because he should have remained in the city of his refuge until the death of the high priest: but after the death of the high priest the slayer shall return into the land of his possession.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s