Islam is not a race? Obama White House wants to change that, a post from Jihad Watch with comments

For years those of us who have dared to note how Islamic jihadis invoke the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims have been accused of “racism.” This Big Lie has been repeated so often and so insistently, without any breaking of ranks among the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media, that it has become commonplace. In response, I have repeated more times than I could possibly recall: “What race is the jihad mass murder of innocent civilians again? I keep forgetting.” I’ve pointed out almost as often that Muslims who believe that their god is commanding them to wage war against and subjugate those who don’t believe as they do come in all races, and that race has nothing to do with their imperatives.

These simple truths have not stopped the charges of “racism,” of course, because those charges have Soros millions behind them, and a seemingly endless supply of well-paid Leftist and Islamic supremacist operatives eager to repeat them. But apparently the patent falsehood of the charge has caused some concern to this propagandist cabal, because now the Obama White House is attempting to give the propaganda a better footing by declaring a new race: “Middle Eastern and North African.”

It’s not a perfect designation, because it would include Middle Eastern and North African Christians and other non-Muslims, and would exclude Muslims who aren’t Middle Eastern and North African, but the principal beneficiary would be Muslim Arabs, and that is obviously the objective. This new designation would allow the incoming Clinton administration, among other things, to enforce “the Voting Rights Act and drawing congressional and state legislative district boundaries,” i.e., gerrymander districts to exaggerate Muslim voting power; establish “federal affirmative action plans and evaluating claims of employment discrimination in employment in the private sector,” i.e., continue and expand Obama administration efforts to establish special preferences and accommodations for Muslims in the workplace; and help “minority-owned small businesses get federal grants and loans,” i.e., make sure that Muslim-owned businesses get a healthy slice of the federal taxpayer pie.

Those special privileges are, ultimately, what this is all about, as well as to bolster the spurious charge of “racism” leveled against those who oppose jihad terror and Sharia supremacism.


“White House wants to add new racial category,” by Gregory Korte, USA Today, October 1, 2016:

WASHINGTON — The White House is putting forward a proposal to add a new racial category for people from the Middle East and North Africa under what would be the biggest realignment of federal racial definitions in decades.

If approved, the new designation could appear on census forms in 2020 and could have far-reaching implications for racial identity, anti-discrimination laws and health research.

Under current law, people from the Middle East are considered white, the legacy of century-old court rulings in which Syrian Americans argued that they should not be considered Asian — because that designation would deny them citizenship under the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act. But scholars and community leaders say more and more people with their roots in the Middle East find themselves caught between white, black and Asian classifications that don’t fully reflect their identities.

“What it does is it helps these communities feel less invisible,” said Helen Samhan of the Arab American Institute, which has been advocating the change for more than 30 years. “It’s a good step, a positive step.”

On Friday, the White House Office of Management and Budget advanced the proposal with a notice in the Federal Register, seeking comments on whether to add Middle Eastern and North African as a separate racial or ethnic category, which groups would be included, and what it should be called.

Under the proposal, the new Middle East and North African designation — or MENA, as it’s called by population scholars — is broader in concept than Arab (an ethnicity) or Muslim (a religion). It would include anyone from a region of the world stretching from Morocco to Iran, and including Syrian and Coptic Christians, Israeli Jews and other religious minorities.

But the Census Bureau, which has been quietly studying the issue for two years, also has gotten caught up in debates about some groups — such as Turkish, Sudanese and Somali Americans — who aren’t included in that category. Those are issues the White House is trying to resolve before adding the box on 2020 census forms.

Adding a box on the census form could have implications beyond racial identity. According to the White House notice, the new data could be used for a wide range of political and policy purposes, including:

• Enforcing the Voting Rights Act and drawing congressional and state legislative district boundaries;

• Establishing federal affirmative action plans and evaluating claims of employment discrimination in employment in the private sector;

• Monitoring discrimination in housing, mortgage lending and credit;

• Enforcing school desegregation policies; and

• Helping minority-owned small businesses get federal grants and loans.

Adding the classification also would help the government and independent scholars understand more about trends in health, employment and education.

“We can’t even ask questions like that, because we don’t have the data,” said Germine Awad, an Egyptian-American and professor of educational psychology at the University of Texas at Austin….

Germany: 16-year-old Muslim migrant planned Islamic State jihad massacre


  1. Taurus Caerulus says

    October 1, 2016 at 12:20 pm

    Islam is not a race! It’s a de- or an attacheable Ideology!

    But All in All it’s a huge folk. (Ummah)

    At last it’s peaceful and a race!

      • Taurus Caerulus says

        October 1, 2016 at 6:11 pm

        For money, many-many people will kill his own securing mother!

        Because of this, the actual government of america and germany gives a shit on his civilisation.

    • maghan says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:11 pm

      Another racist-colonialist meme from Obama. North Africa is in Africa. The “Middle East” is an arch-British imperialist and colonialist geopolitical designation. Obama is obviously an ignoramus on such matters.

      • Arthur of The Britons says

        October 2, 2016 at 12:19 am

        ‘The “Middle East” is an arch-British imperialist and colonialist geopolitical designation’ – Crap

  2. bleeps says

    October 1, 2016 at 12:22 pm

    Professor in Educational Psychology? Is this a proffesor in Brainwashing techniques?! How far will this go? We must see the bigger picture as new intrigues are being sewed before us!

    • Custos Custodum says

      October 1, 2016 at 4:57 pm

      Note the key role played in the pro-Islamic propaganda war and most other Marxist subversion by self-important products ofteacher training schools as opposed to traditional universities with traditional courses of study leading to real, cognizable degrees.

      Obama’s ghostwriter and mentor Bill Ayers is a “professor” of “education.” Education is an important art, but the alleged “science” mostly amounts to Marxist/Leftist indoctrination and propaganda.

      • le mouron rouge says

        October 1, 2016 at 8:54 pm

        Custos Custodum,


        “The battle for mankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom. The classroom must and will become the arena of conflict between…the rotting corpse of Christianity and the new faith of humanism.”
        – John Dewey (1859-1952)

        That battle for the heart, mind and soul rages on, it’s being fueled by the Philosophy of people like John Dewey, Luigi Taparelli, Antonio Gramsci, Saul Alinsky, Helena Blavatsky, Alice Bailey, Cecil Rhodes, Friedrich Nietzsche and Georg Hegel.

        From my perspective, the bad guys are winning this battle, those of us on the right, who cherish Judeo/Christian principles, the Constitution and the Rule of Law are rowing upstream with a broken paddle.

  3. Michael Laudahn says

    October 1, 2016 at 12:54 pm

    In constitutional theory, the power is to be divided by 3 players: executive, legislation, jurisdiction. (Some say that in practice it’s 4 and add the media.)

    In reality, I can see 1 only, and that’s the executive – in all the comparable countries. Why is no-one in the other authorities taking exception to the situation and do the necessary thing to enforce the rules of the constitution?

    Ironically enough, the situation seems to be especially bad in those countries who are considered to have exemplary constitutions – like the US or Switzerland. Or is it just that the contrast between pretension and reality there is especially clear.

  4. Ciudadano says

    October 1, 2016 at 12:54 pm

    I’m not American and don’t get American obsession with race. In my country I’m never asked about my race. Government forms never ask for race, neither work applications. The only time I’ve had to check a box for race was filling the paper work to get my Visa to travel to America.

    How come Americans consider “hispanic” or “latino” races? That’s is ridiculous. In Latin America subcontinent there are Blacks, Chinese, Jews, Arabic, black, Caucasian, Indians and a lot of mixed race people.

    • rubiconcrest says

      October 1, 2016 at 5:51 pm

      Yes, very interesting observation. Classifying people by race is about political power and actually creates the very thing we are trying to reduce, dividing people by race.

        • Gary says

          October 2, 2016 at 1:09 am

          …which is what is currently happening. The “Author of confusion” is having his way.

          For now.

          He’ll reside in the Lake of Fire soon.

    • Kepha says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:45 pm

      Well, Cioucadano, when my eldest son went to Middle School, he was asked to fill in one of five color codes: (1) “white” (2) “african-american” (which you are even if you are a Nigerian on a Green Card), (3) “Hispanic”, (4) “native American” (which you are only if your ancestors immigrated more than several thousands of years ago and lived on a reservation for a while), and (5) “Asian Pacific”. He wondered which he should fill in, since I am [mostly] “white” and his mother is from the far side of the Pacific. I told him to check two.

      I got called into the principal’s office and ended up telling them, “Which parent do you want him to deny?”
      That only made them madder.

      rubiconcrest, I have reached a similar conclusion.

    • Arthur says

      October 1, 2016 at 11:41 pm

      As an American, I agree with your sentiments. The civil rights movement called for an end to separate-but-equal (which was never equal) and that we should all become “color blind.” I was raised largely “color blind” and in my experience ethnicity mainly predicts customs, not character. But it seems so counter-productive how race-focused the left has become.

      From a scientific point of view, DNA analysis shows that self-identification of race does not really predict genetic ancestry ( And remember the unusual case of Sandra Laing (, which essentially disproved any validity for racism and “race”. Bottom line: science doesn’t support the left’s fanaticism with race, but our “Progressive” president would rather take us back to primitive, non-scientific, thinking.

      With whole genome individual DNA sequencing headed for routine medical care, what will it mean to say that someone is 37% Scandinavian 32% Saxon 28% Anglo 2% native American 1% west African??? Which part of the ancestry are you being racist about? Or will it all depend on the (measurable) color of your skin? But then the color of your skin can change! Did George Hamilton become black? Did Michael Jackson become white? In the truly integrated reality of our present, “race” is increasingly a term of non-scientific nonsense.

    • maghan says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:16 pm

      It all goes back to Obama being stupidly caught in the racist neocolonialist politico-linguistic trap of “sub-Saharan” Africa and MENA. What an ignoramus. The correct language should be geographical, nor pseudo-racist. Thus, in Africa there would be West Africa, North Africa, East Africa, Central Africa, and Southern Africa. That’s common sense, isn’t it?

  5. eduardo odraude says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:03 pm

    In the UK, unfortunately, it seems many counterjihadis (hopefully not most) confuse racial with counterjihad issues. They don’t realize they are playing right into the jihadis hands by doing that. This is not about race — this is about freedom of speech and religion — values non-existent or terribly hobbled in Islamic lands, because Muhammad badly and violently hobbled those values in his teachings and by his example.

  6. Georg says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    “This Big Lie has been repeated so often and so insistently…that it has become commonplace.”

    Can’t remember who said it, but to paraphrase, “common sense is the highest ideology” is about the most flooring of insights I’ve ever heard.

  7. utis says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:15 pm

    Oh great, the White (racist?) House is pushing a new tool of control and oppression on us! “Race” itself is BS — either by choice or by force, too many “mix-ed race” babies have been produced through the centuries. If you forced everyone to get a DNA test, the results would be shocking.
    I thought race-mania died with Hitler. Boy, was I wrong! It’s the 21st century, liberals. Let “race” die like the phlogiston theory.
    If the minions of our neither white nor black president have their way, we’re gonna get people whining about being racially mis-labelled. What if the Dalai Lama wants to be called “African”? What if Oprah wants to be called Japanese? Give the “race” crap a rest, President Choom.

  8. Stan Lee says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:20 pm

    Obama has been a failure in matters of state, he has corrupted the U.S. government by sneaking into it Muslims, with Muslim-Islamic world conquest objectives. The U.S. government is laced with anti-American Islamism..
    It is noticeable that Obama does not venture into the real problems facing our nation or that of other nations which now know that U.S.A. is no longer a world leader since Obama, Nations who looked to the USA for even moral support no longer have that partner. The objective; to make nationality disappear.and “One World” to then emerge.
    In the interim, Obama comes up with nit-picking classifications which he obviously calculates, if his ideas take root, to be celebrated as his legacy. At present whatever legacy he thinks he has is that of a “lame duck” politician.

    That still does not quell his hunger for recognition, I believe all of this twisting and turning of ethnicity and religions are part of his personal plan for Obama…to be an exclusive ruler of a “One World government” where nations are brushed aside in favor of race-juggling or ethnic-juggling This drive would fit his “One World government” which would no longer take nationality into consideration.

    Obama has taken George Soris’ “One World government” as his own. It goes against the grain of Americans, their Constitution, their freedoms, which is an explanation of why he detests the free people of the United States.

    • Jay Boo says

      October 1, 2016 at 10:40 pm

      Then there is the wildcard Trump?
      One thing that Obama loves about Donald Trump is that he is a distraction that the Obama defenders can whine about when they should instead all bow their heads in shame while attempting to defend supporting such a disgrace as the treasonous Obama.

      Before the year is over, all the MSM will be sleazing in puff pieces about the alleged “noble statesman” Obama while using Donald Trump as a foil unless Donald Trump supporters get their separate attack dogs to take on the Obama-Hillary MUSLIM financed attack dog machine.

  9. Resist says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:20 pm

    This world is doomed and I will clap my hands to see it go under. Muslims and iSSlam is for retards and brainwashed. They will destroy us but themselves…and doom all their chidren. It’s obvious the antichrist is them with crooked politicians and journalists that will ponder when they kick their buckets

  10. Transmaster says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:20 pm

    I can see it now. A terrorist attack kills all of the children in a daycare center. Allah Akbar ‘s are heard shouted above the screaming children just before the bombs go off killing everyone, So what do we hear being reported from the likes of MSNBC, “White Arabs attacking a daycare center…..” White being the operative word.

  11. TJ says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:28 pm

    Careful observation has shown me the relationship between the POTUS and islam is a rat’s nest. For example, when he went to Egypt and aligned with the muslim brotherhood, their candidate promptly proclaimed muslims have the right to kill people who quit islam, prompting a deadly riot. Then a protester in Tunisia set himself on fire and sparked a series of murderous uprisings across the Arab world and the POTUS somehow compared this deadly perverted protester to the benign black granny Rosa Parks. Then the POTUS goes to the UN and proclaims the words of Mohammed must live forever. In the hadith, which many muslims consider valid, Mohammed is quoted as saying women go to hell more often than men because they get spiritually deranged during their period… but it is ok to get with them sexually when they are bloody. Mohammed is really saying God did a better job with men than women, which is blasphemous. So far, the POTUS has failed to live up to the promise he made in the church in California where he said if he was wrong he would admit his mistakes.

  12. JIMJFOX says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:43 pm

    “Race is not biological. It is a social construct. There is no gene or cluster of genes common to all blacks or all whites. Were race “real” in the genetic sense, racial classifications for individuals would remain constant across boundaries”

    Seems ‘race’ is much like ‘Islamophobia’- a convenient way to justify persecution.

  13. Edgar Allen says

    October 1, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    This idea is a disaster and needs to be killed in the bud. I am an American of Egyptian descent and a Coptic Christian, and I OPPOSE this new designation. Besides creating more divisions among americans, the only purpose behind this latest Obama push is to create a de-facto “race” for Muslim Arabs. Since Muslim Arabs make up the vast majority of this new MENA designation, all the political pandering, the plum government appointments, the affirmative action dollars and benefits will be channeled through Muslim community leaders. This will simply push the Muslim agenda further along. It will also give Muslims wo use the “Islamophobia” complaint card a new powerful lawfare weapon: claims of racial discrimination, protected by the courts of the New World Order.

    • Kepha says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:53 pm

      With you, Edgar Allen. I’ve met Middle Eastern Christians, Jews, and Muslims who run the whole gamut of 19th century vintage “racial” categories. There’s an Egyptian-born imam not so far from where I live who, if he were to go out without his turban and robe, would be “whiter” than I am.

      This guy Obama was supposed to bridge the racial divide, and I have not seen this country so badly divided “racially” since the 1970’s. God save us!

      • Mazo says

        October 1, 2016 at 10:20 pm

        What do physical looks have to do with ethnicity?

        Zhuang and Miao people live off affirmative action in China. Inner, Mongols, Khampa Tibetans and Uyghurs who fled with the KMT to Taiwan all lived off affirmative action and welfare payments. They opposed independence because they like sucking government benefits. Yulbars Khan never worked a day after he set foot in Taiwan.

        There are Jews in Kaifeng who are very angry they can’t be welfare queens and live off benefits because they don’t have minority status. They’ve been denanding affirmatuve action handouts and reservations.

        • gravenimage says

          October 1, 2016 at 10:37 pm

          And Mazo here engages in a little gratuitous antisemitism. Muslims love to live off the “filthy Infidels”–is he incapable of understanding that not everyone thinks like this?

        • Kepha says

          October 1, 2016 at 11:08 pm

          Re the Jews in China–including some elderly “foreign friends” who stayed in Beijing, took Chinese nationality, and then went Frum in their old age, back in the ’90’s the Communist Party whispered darkly “Remember what happened in Russia after THOSE people got uppity?”, when the total Jewish population of China that can reasonably claim Chinese nationality can’t top about 1,000 people out of more than a billion.

          Hey, Mazo. I hear you. I’m connected to Hakka people, on branch of the great Han nationality, myself.

    • JMB says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:07 pm

      Not really. Race is a very real thing. This is where it will get very difficult if they decide to designate Islam as being a race. Get a white Muslim from the Balkans, put him alongside an Egyptian, a Syrian and an Indonesian and guess what, not only will they look quite different to each other, they will think differently.
      Then, get a Egyptian Muslim and a Coptic Christian and you will notice that they are of exactly the same race and ethnicity.
      And now getting very personal my family has English, Scottish, Greek, and Iranian connections. We identify ourselves as European (and white) Australians.
      Race is very real, it can also get a little bit “fuzzy”

      • gravenimage says

        October 1, 2016 at 10:56 pm

        JMB wrote:

        Not really. Race is a very real thing. This is where it will get very difficult if they decide to designate Islam as being a race. Get a white Muslim from the Balkans, put him alongside an Egyptian, a Syrian and an Indonesian and guess what, not only will they look quite different to each other, they will think differently.

        JMB, people may think differently because of culture, but *not* because of race. Race does not effect people’s thoughts.

        Besides, the problem is that Muslims from the Balkans, from Egypt, from Syria, and from Indonesia all follow the same vile creed, and so are apt to have the same thoughts on the subservient status of women, on the imposition of Shari’ah law, and on the permissibility of slaughtering Infidel if they do not submit to Islam.

        On the other hand, Coptic Christians think in many ways quite differently from Egyptian Muslims, despite their much closer genetic heritage.

        • JMB says

          October 2, 2016 at 1:40 am

          Hi Graven Image. I always appreciate any reply to my posts. This site is all about the spread of Islam and in particular it’s threat to our way of life. Hopefully we can raise public awareness of this threat, hopefully we can challenge our political leaders as well.

          As for race, I am not racist but a race realist. The best example of this that I can think of can be seen right here in Australia. Our beautiful Aboriginal people, yes beautiful and also “stone age” in culture and appearance.They have developed a culture over thousands of years and survived in the worlds most hostile environment. They have been destroyed by the scourges of our civilisation particularly alcohol and the welfare handout mentality. Most of all they have been destroyed by the do-gooders who say they are just like us, give them some money, clothes, a cheap mean little house on the edge of town and try and educate them and they will just be like us. Nothing could be further from the truth, it has destroyed them totally. hence my argument that races are different.

          Some time ago I was talking to a neighbour who opened her heart to me, quite angrily at times and told me that she was a Muslim, she said we don’t have to wear all that stupid garb etc. She was wearing a tee shirt and shorts and make-up, she could have been any other white Australian woman, no race difference here.

          Race and cultural differences are real but they can also be very fuzzy.

  14. Mac-101 says

    October 1, 2016 at 2:43 pm

    This is being done by the Elites so as to further divide us. The British Empire in the last half of the 19th century controlled 1/4th of the world population with 85 thousand troops. They did this through Divide and Conquer/Control..
    Who would have ever dreamed that America would be divided into so many subgroups just ten years ago? And once Soros and his Handlers gain total control world with their NWO, most of us will be culled to git the world population down to the 500 Million that the Elites want.

    • JMB says

      October 1, 2016 at 7:58 pm

      In the USA context has that special quality that is so loved by politicians, he can be everything to every one, to the Afro-Americans he is one of them To the Muslims he has enough connections to make him one of them. To whites, well he had a white mother, that makes him less intimidating than a full-blooded African. To the loopy left he also has the right credentials, student radical and no aristocratic background.
      For everyone else we just shake our heads in wonderment saying how did this happen?
      As to race, many futurologists would say, this is part of the ongoing trend when one day the whole of mankind will be one, possibly with a mid to dark brown skin colour?
      In the meantime most of us live in the real world and know that there is no way a good young man from the Methodist Church will ever be able to date a young lady from a Muslim family, or that the Japanese will ever accept immigrants.
      I identify with the White Race (Caucasian, another stupid term) and am proud of this and want this to be the way of my descendants. I make no apologies for this.

      • maghan says

        October 1, 2016 at 8:20 pm

        “Full blooded African”? What is that? “Full blooded European” or “Full blooded Asian”–who ever heard of that?.

        • JMB says

          October 1, 2016 at 8:25 pm

          Full Blooded African, using the 90% rule, there are approximately one million of them on the African Continent, they are of many different ethnic groups but most of them want to come to the West for the good life.

    • JMB says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:14 pm

      Sorry, I have to quote Scripture for this one;(Rev. 12:12)

      But woe to you, O earth and sea, for the devil has come down to you in great wrath, because he knows that his time is short!”

      • Mark Swan says

        October 1, 2016 at 10:09 pm

        Yes, this will be after His final fit with God, He will be cast back to the Earth, and never
        allowed to leave again. Demonic activity will be out in the open more than ever before.
        He will know God has greatly diminished the protection afforded to Humans. It will be
        pure nightmare time and a real woe to all the Earth. Which will soon wish they had not
        rejected the Living God who afforded protection from the destroyer. He will make use
        of what ever God allows as punishment for sinful Humans, in the very short time He has.

        The whole Earth will Know when this begins, this time is ominous.

  15. overman says

    October 1, 2016 at 3:14 pm

    Every time l see a muslim on the news defending lslam, the ‘race card’ is always used. Look at this muslim using it in the video. Apparently, the Danish National Party is handing out ‘Asylum Spray’ to protect women from refugees.

    Asylum Spray! Handed out in Denmark by far-right ‘to ward off migrant attacks’

    • JMB says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:21 pm

      So there is a Danish National Party, this is very encouraging.. Yes, the Nationalist parties are springing up everywhere and in the USA it is called Donald Trump.

  16. jewdog says

    October 1, 2016 at 3:22 pm

    The Left all over the West is increasingly dependent on the Muslim vote, which is one big reason why it panders.

  17. Jerry says

    October 1, 2016 at 3:43 pm

    And this just goes to show how conniving obama and friends can be. Of course their stated goal might be so these “communities seem less invisible.” But the end result of enacting such a proposal would be a codified defense of muslims’ cultural and religious traditions as a kind of racial imperative, thereby providing additional legal protection where none is deserved. My evidence for this outcome is in the unfounded accusations of race hate by the left levied against us. From that it’s easy to imagine how a formal designation of islam’s primary benefactors–arabs–as a distinctive “race” would garner special protection for the culture, faith, and traditions of islam. This undoubtedly would translate into more hypersensitivity toward muslims and would in effect be a cudgel for beating down our justifiable objections to islam’s supremacist agenda and the violence it’s causing.

    I’m not a sociologist or scientist in biology, so maybe I’m wrong in my understanding of race and how it relates to current law. But I’m full of confidence in my view of the left’s eagerness to exploit every possible weakness in protecting islam and its muslims. And a new, formal designation favoring muslims would surely be one more example of this. Excuse me for being skeptical, there’s simply too many reasons to see the worst in this obama slight of hand that is bound to kiss islam.

  18. abad says

    October 1, 2016 at 4:13 pm

    Hussein Muslim Obama needs to be tried for treason and impeached on grounds of giving his allegiance to a foreign state (ISL), worshipping a foreign deity (The Kaaba, situated in Mecca, Saudi Arabia), being born in a foreign country (Kenya), violating the Constitution, causing more racial division in the United States than ever before…..the list is endless.

    Kick him out of the White House now before it is too late.

    President Muslim Obama.


    • judith grayson says

      October 1, 2016 at 5:33 pm

      it is too late. this is not the end however. it is the beginning. we will have to rouse ourselves from our barcaloungers and come out from behind the living room drapes and declare ourselves as free people who will not tolerate a lawless corrupt bullshit society and the billionaires who love it. we should be in the streets now. our separation of church and state has been utterly violated and is unconstitutional to do so. that in itself should bring a loud response. one that perhaps could even wake up our craven lowlife congresspersons. we could close the mosques. we could elbow our way in and demand that our law enforcement commence surveillance, instead of allowing the monkey in the doj to surveill our police. another bizarre moment in this most bizarro of all worlds. and all the rest of it that we all know about. all too well.

      • Jerry says

        October 1, 2016 at 7:05 pm

        “…our separation of church and state has been utterly violated and is unconstitutional to do so…”

        That’s right, a political alliance has been made between our politicians and muslims’ fascist political agenda under the guise of religious protection. It’s a subversive and illegal use of religion to advance an ideology with clearly stated goals of violence and war against us. So I think you’re right, it isunconstitutional, it’s an unholy alliance that contradicts the fundamental principle of separation of church and state as described in our constitution:

        Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

        Any defense of islam is a defense of sharia, which is in effect a set of laws that supports the establishment of islam over all other faiths. Leftist politicians are granting their governmental sanction for the laws of a foreign power (islam) that declares itself superior in matters of religion and politics above our own. This is clearly a case of promoting laws for the establishment of a religion, islam, in contradiction to the 1st amendment, and it’s also an act of political subversion. It’s fair to say that one can mistake the ideas of some abstract philosophy, but nobody can mistake islam for anything other than what it truly is. There is no room for doubt or confusion in regard to islams’ supremacist intentions and those who kill and war in its name. Therefore it is at a minimum an inexcusable breach of the public trust when our politicians provide political aid that favors islam at the expense of our constitutional rights and freedoms. Such as free speech, also a protected right of the 1st amendment, islam disallows our right to speak freely in a multitude of ways. And also our right to peaceably assemble,as islam restricts political and religious dissent in ways we find unacceptable. And also our right to petition the government, something almost unheard of in islamic run countries where justice and equality are inferior to islam’s bigoted and inhumane dogmas for allah.

        So yeah, you’re right, it’s unconstitutional. But the left will go to their grave defending the lie that it isn’t.

  19. Champ says

    October 1, 2016 at 4:28 pm

    These false labels/lies of “islamophobia” and “racism” certainly are tedious to navigate through. But that’s all they are: lies.

  20. John A. Marre says

    October 1, 2016 at 4:28 pm

    It’s an ideology of death and destruction. It is not a race. This man makes me wonder if he is an adherent of that ideology, since he seems obsessed with giving it every favor possible.

    • Jerry says

      October 1, 2016 at 5:09 pm

      …and a dedication to truth, justice, and morality. But this is something the current administration seems to lack. Can’t wait for a change.

  21. Wellington says

    October 1, 2016 at 5:22 pm

    The Democratic Party in America has become an enemy of what the American Revolution was all about——liberty and limited government. The Democratic Party now stands for ever expanding government and a restriction of liberty (e.g., making that bogus distinction between free speech and hate speech, but as George Orwell opined, if you can’t tell someone what they don’t want to hear, free speech doesn’t really exist). And the Republican Party, while still adhering to the principles of the American Revolution in theory, just ineptly fumbles one attempt after another in effectively opposing the Democrats, and this helps to partially explain why Donald Trump won the Republican nomination because, say what you will about him, he has balls. And so nonsense, such as the subject matter of this article, has a good chance, perhaps a very good chance, of being implemented since the Democratic Party has lost its collective mind and the Republican Party has lost its collective guts.

    Ever increasingly I find myself loving my country but despising my government. I would argue that I am fully justified moving in this direction. Indeed, I have to wonder about the wisdom, knowledge and common sense of those who haven’t. I see a dearth of all three in those who haven’t.

    • Mark Swan says

      October 1, 2016 at 8:19 pm

      It is heartbreaking to see this great nation, stifled for so long from enjoying the results of
      good government, which could literally help us have so much more quality of social justice,
      freedom, peace, security, hope, dignity, prosperity and so much more.

    • Kepha says

      October 1, 2016 at 9:05 pm

      And the Democratic Party was the one founded by such men as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson.

      Wellington, as a public high school teacher, I see this:

      Obama’s “world class education”?
      Please spare us such obfuscation!
      We’re bureaucracy-ridden,
      So we keep our views hidden,
      And practice much prevarication.

      90% of what is done in my shop is done to either prevent lawsuit, justify the continued employment of some bureaucrat in the state capital or DC, or both, and has nothing to do with helping Johnny or Juanita learn to read or whatever. We’ve got Shrillary Shroooooooo poised to become the next POTUS with her “takes a village” nonsense–since it’s her party’s ideology of increasing government intervention in wider and wider areas of life, its evil “the personal is political” stance, and its insane redefinition of things like “family” that is destroying the tissue of low-level relationships that make “villages” (smaller, natural communities) tick.

      A sensible government, such as we had in times past, would recognize that there are pre-political social norms and institutions, a jus divino et naturae and would learn to work with them.

      • Kepha says

        October 1, 2016 at 9:07 pm

        We defeated ourselves by destroying ourselves from within long before the O started at his elite school in Hawaii and Islam started getting uppity again.

        • Wellington says

          October 1, 2016 at 9:18 pm

          In other words, Kepha, it’s the 1960s still biting us in the ass. What a tragic decade that was. It did have two accomplishments——–the second civil rights era which was necessary and NASA working optimally. But it unleashed the harpies against the Establishment which didn’t need to be ended, merely fixed. The harpies tried to end it. They’re still doing so. They’re succeeding.

        • Kepha says

          October 1, 2016 at 11:16 pm

          @Wellington at 9:18 pm:

          I don’t see the Silly ‘Sixties as a tragic decade. They were a low, mean, rotten, lying one, as W.H. Auden described the 1930’s. But you are right if you interpret me as saying that I think the Silly ‘Sixties and Sillier ‘Seventies are still biting us in the 屁股–and I share your view that the 2d civil rights era was necessary and that NASA worked splendidly. The pervasiveness, though, of the era’s low, mean, rotten, and lying character meant that much that was positive got corrupted and turned to destructive ends (as the latter history of the civil rights movement shows).

          Nice to hear from you, fellow geezer.

        • Mark Swan says

          October 1, 2016 at 11:41 pm

          When modern liberal talk about American values they are talking about
          collectivist, secular, progressive values. So if any other values exist, and
          they sure do, they get brushed aside. We see this is promoted as what our
          American values have always been. We see this when judges rule against
          the National will of their people, and discover new never before existing
          in the constitution, rights and values, that support their mindset. After all
          they attended the right schools and received degrees, and while their, had
          their indoctrination into this right thinking.

          The very standards of American, strengths, individualism, free-enterprise,
          the reason behind law, morality, discipline, and honest hard work, are all
          viewed very differently by today’s progressive education.

          They just don’t want to hear, the truth is that these values and thoughts were,
          the very heart of the Greatest Nation on Earth, and they seem willing to let
          the freedoms that the whole world aches for, be watered down, to keep this
          new right thinking.

  22. Richard Paulsen says

    October 1, 2016 at 5:39 pm

    Is Donald Trump the only one worrying about terrorism in Europa? Islam is growing in Europe. Some 45 millions in Europe now and growing. How many will there be? There are lots of more muslims globally than europeans. Lots wishing to go to Europe and the U.S.A. as well.
    There is the NATO cooperation. What if the Muslim brotherhood, Daesh, al Shabaab, al Qaeda, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, Libya, will gain more influence in Europe?
    There are nukes and other dangerous military weapons in Europe. What if they fall in the hands of muslim leadership? In the hands of people from MENA?
    What sort of military security and balance will that be? What will happen to the peoples in Europe?
    How will that effect U.S.A.?
    Lots of questions. Just Donald Trump of leading politicians seems to worry. Impressed by his great judgement and insight.
    The most dangerous times ever for Europe and the U.S.A.. Changings going on like never before. Weapons of massdestruction in Europe risking to fall in the hands of totalitarian islamic leadership.
    Never in the history of Europe had a totalitarian Europe weapons of massdestruction in its hands.
    Never before in the history of Europe and mankind were there such strong weaponry in Europe risking to fall in the hands of muslim rulers.
    Never before in the history of Europe were there so many muslims in Europe with the intention to spread and follow islam. Never before so many muslims coming without a limit from the Muslim World to Europe.
    There are three times more muslims in the World than european citizens. More muslims globally than in both Europe and U.S.A, together. Looking for better lives, establishing islam. Respecting neither Europe nor U.S.A..
    Every politician, other leaders and each citizen in the Western World has a responsibility and must realize the danger and do hers or his best to change and stop the growing threat from the muslim world to the civilized world.
    There is a mutual interest in deserving the Western World from new totalitarian destructive leadership having destroyed so much in other parts of the World. Economic support and other ways of helping failing.
    Hoping the american voters will show better judgement than europeans so far.

  23. Paul says

    October 1, 2016 at 5:52 pm

    The Guardian had an article a while ago in which they argued
    why it wasn’t sufficient to argue that Mohammedanism is not
    a “race”.
    Regressive left – now that you are no longer falling for the BS
    “racist” slur, you WILL accept our redefinition of reality and
    wholeheartedly embrace those who wish to hold a knife to your
    throat and grovel while they kill you.
    Their pathetic attempts not only highlight their utter malice and
    abject dishonesty, but also their complete insanity.

  24. Hermes says

    October 1, 2016 at 6:06 pm

    Race is very unscientific. Does he mean ‘ethnicity’? Also problematic.

    Are Hispanics ‘whites’ Of course they are? Are dark-skinned people of Caucasian descent ‘whites’? Of course they are. Are Muslims from Afghanistan and Syria, ‘whites’ – of course they are. Are aboriginal people in Canada ‘whites’? I do not know (are they actually Mongoloid?)

    Are this is useless,. Either be colour blind or do it scientifically – by DNA. Anything in between causes trouble.

    • Don McKellar says

      October 1, 2016 at 6:26 pm

      Separation of people into “races” is something that should have ended a long time ago. Some time shortly after the civil rights movement. But it is a power tool by the Democrats. They can’t let it die as it gives them divide and conquer power.

      • Richard Paulsen says

        October 1, 2016 at 7:12 pm

        These days were important. Nowadays there are other questions. They are totally turning things up and down.
        Can not understand why they are avoiding the problems of today.
        Misleading instead of leading.

  25. Don McKellar says

    October 1, 2016 at 6:24 pm


    This has been the Democrat game plan for many decades. And it continues with this.

    The only thing new here is that Obama is putting his trademark “moslems first” spin on it. He’s just rolling these things out, isn’t he? One after another, from trying to cede control over the internet to the Islamic Bloc so they can cut out undesirable “defamers of religion” via the United Nations, to the Iran deal, to trying to stop the law to sue Saudi Arabia, now this. What’s next on his Islamic agenda? He still has some time left. He’s got something BIG planned. Count on it.

    • Don McKellar says

      October 1, 2016 at 6:31 pm

      Once again I will make my prediction that Obama will come out of the closet as a moslem. He will fake that he had a “sudden conversion” to Islam. He simply will not be able to resist the landmark (for him) of being not only the first president of color, but the first moslem president. He will do this right after the election, before he steps down. Look for it to happen right in that sweet spot of time.

    • Paul says

      October 1, 2016 at 6:33 pm

      I’d love to be able to refute the points you’ve made Don, but I can’t.
      Maybe this video can help to shed some light on what we can expect :

      • Don McKellar says

        October 1, 2016 at 8:34 pm

        I don’t know if it sheds light as Alex Jones is partial entertainment / partial truthful reporting / partial conspiracy theory / partial shocking fact — however this video is entirely plausible in its scenarios, I can’t deny it. When Bill Clinton had his not so secret meeting with the DoJ head on her plane so brazenly and got away with it, anybody with a brain had to have realized that they that they might do any shady deal they had to to win this election. The Clintons view themselves completely above the law and they have the most deceptive president of all time in the White House who is desperate that his pro-moslem. pro-globalist agenda, anti-America legacy stays intact past his term. Yes, I can’t dismiss this video. Thanks.

  26. Angemon says

    October 1, 2016 at 6:38 pm

    WASHINGTON — The White House is putting forward a proposal to add a new racial category for people from the Middle East and North Africa under what would be the biggest realignment of federal racial definitions in decades.

    Pointless when they can’t tell the difference between a Turk or Persian and an “Hispanic”. But there’s a sinister agenda behind this measure. This would give the cries of “racism” flung against opponents of taking in tens of thousands of “Syrian” “refugees” a semblance of legitimacy. “Racism” has a series of connotations, none of them positive. This measure is nothing but an attempt to co-opt those connotations and use them to further an agenda.

    In the end, it doesn’t matter if the WH considers “North Africans” or “Middle Easterners” to be a different race, opponents of unrestricted immigration from muslim-majority areas are concerned about ideas and actions derived from those ideas, not the level of melanin in their skin – the question is, how long will it take for the general public to wave away the smokescreen?

  27. Guest says

    October 1, 2016 at 6:47 pm

    1. The people from the Middle East are not white, they are Arabian.
    2. Islam is a religion.
    Obama has just reached a new level of stupidity

      • Denver says

        October 1, 2016 at 10:18 pm

        Arabs are as Caucasian as any European, Moroccan, Kulak, Georgian or Persian. Look on a map, find the Caucasus Mountains, see where they are. That is the source of all Caucasians.

  28. davej says

    October 1, 2016 at 7:23 pm

    They want Muslims to be considered a race so they can accuse you of racism, pure and simple.

    Wish we had a real alternative to Hillary but we don’t. Trump correctly questions “what’s going on” but in every other way is a moronic flimflam man. So get ready for President Clinton II and her faithful Muslim Brotherhood-connected Executive Assistant.

    Out of the Muslim sympathizing pan into the Muslim owned fire.

    • Jerry says

      October 1, 2016 at 7:40 pm

      “…but in every other way is a moronic flimflam man.”

      Sadly I think you’re right. Oh how I was rooting for Trump to be more than the vacuous boob he so clearly is. He had the courage to speak the bold truth, but like a child without an ounce of intellect to back it up. I probably won’t vote this year. One intelligent paragraph from his mouth would go far in changing my mind, but I’m not holding my breath.

      • Gbox says

        October 1, 2016 at 7:50 pm

        I get your point. The problem is that one of these 2 extremely flawed people will enter the White House. Among other serious flaws, one of them definitely will open the doors to more immigrants from Muslim-dominant countries, which definitely will include a percentage of Islamists and/or future jihadis. One of them will appoint as Chief of Staff a woman who, if not a member, has strong connections and sympathies with the Muslim Brotherhood, Abedin.

        • Jerry says

          October 1, 2016 at 8:09 pm

          I think what you’re saying is, If you have difficulties making a decision, choose the lesser of the two evils.Rajneesh. That means Trump for me, but it’s like choosing cancer over death. It’s the better choice but only if you’re willing to suffer.

      • Kepha says

        October 1, 2016 at 9:13 pm

        I have come to the conclusion that when one or the other becomes so apparently flawed that no-one can deny it after January 20, 2016, Trump will be the easier one to impeach and remove. That is why I will vote for him–even if he is a vacuous boob. Further, while Kaine is the sort who insists he is a pious Catholic while unable to find a manner or time of abortion he doesn’t like, Pence strikes me as a fundamentally decent man who has managed his state well.

        Had I treated classified info as cavalierly as SHrillary Shrooooooooo did when I was in the State Department, I’d be barely out of an orange jumpsuit and unemployable at this time.

  29. Gbox says

    October 1, 2016 at 7:43 pm

    Every time Obama comes out with what appears to be another demonstration of his ignorance, I stop and reconsider– is it really ignorance or is he really a Trojan horse? One can build a convincing case either way..

      • Joe says

        October 2, 2016 at 1:28 am


        The true nature of Islam is long tackled by smart people. For example Mark Twain:

        “That is a simple rule, and easy to remember. When I, a thoughtful and unblessed Presbyterian, examine the Koran, I know that beyond any question every Mohammedan is insane; not in all things, but in religious matters.”

        Or William Ewart Gladstone:

        “Qur’an… an accursed book… So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.”

        The Muslim in chief is a traitor. A Muslim who is practicing taqiyya since at least 8 years, probably way longer (just not in DC).

        His actions beg for prosecution!

  30. somehistory says

    October 1, 2016 at 8:41 pm

    Thankfully, with man and his imperfection in governing others, the “domination of man over man to his injury,” “the only constant is change;”

    Soon to be realized, the Kingdom of God and His will being done on earth..It will be like heaven.

  31. No Fear says

    October 1, 2016 at 8:44 pm

    I cannot “choose to leave” my race. Islam is not a race because people are free to “choose to leave” Islam……as long as they are brave enough to do so.

  32. Denver says

    October 1, 2016 at 9:13 pm

    Arab, or Semitic, not Islam.

    Nevertheless By the Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah, His Imperial Majesty Haile Selassie I, King of Kings of Ethiopia is rolling in his Royal tomb.

  33. jewdog says

    October 1, 2016 at 10:05 pm

    Islam is the Master Faith, not the Master Race. Calling it a race may be convenient in that it helps Muslims gain sympathy as victims, but they will never sympathize with non-Muslims as victims.

  34. David M says

    October 2, 2016 at 12:11 am

    The closet Muslim globalist Obama can’t leave the White House soon enough for me, then he can practice Islam in public without worrying about it. I bet his handlers in Saudi Arabia aren’t happy Congress is squashing his veto on the 9/11 suing of them.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Islam is not a race? Obama White House wants to change that, a post from Jihad Watch with comments

  1. θ says:

    Strategy of establishing the alleged Eurabia and Amerabia is needed to end the unjust Pro-Israel policy in the West.
    Since the Americans and Europeans allow Jews to occupy Arabs, the same support has to be applied for the Arab refugees and immigrants to recompense their loss by trying to create a new state in the West. Yet, funnily the Pro-Israel propagandists are the most opponents of Eurabia and Amerabia
    Let the Pro-Israel hypocrites taste their own Anti-Arab policy.

    Ambiguous dualism of race-faith is a domain of politics. Isn’t Jesus a Jewish by race (half truth), but actually a Christian by faith? Slogan of “Islam is a race” is beneficial for defense. But the fact “Islam is religion, not a race”, is important for the truth.

  2. θ says:

    The Oriental religions may call it a Karma. What goes around comes around. There’s a consequence on the West for having suffered the Arabs in Palestine, Iraq and Syria. The Arabs along with their low level literacy of desert, tribal, misogynist, uncivilised culture messed with the West since it has owned their maladies and miseries practically. You break it you buy it.

    Do not Arabs like so much to beat their women and kill their girls? If so, why does the West still choose to interfere their conflict with Israel?
    Aren’t Arabs want to establish a caliphate everywhere? If so, why does the West still decide to mingle with their sectarian wars?
    Aren’t Arabs misogynists who treat their women so badly like a cheap property? If so, why does the West not recognise the Palestine State so that they may be busied a lot to rebuild their own state?
    Do not Arabs tend to be so corrupt, lazy, deceitful (Taqiyya), and thuggish? If so, why does the West still support the Arab regimes that do not concern about their own people?
    Do not Arabs hate the West so much? If so, why does the West still sell the weapons to them and buy the oil from them?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s