Mohammad’s Jewish wife

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Mohammad’s Jewish wife

  1. θ says:

    The argument of Secularism is shortsighted. Ability to argue and persuade by using intellectual argumentation does not just belong to the Secular people. The believers can refute the Secular arguments by questioning the Secular “pseudo-Morality” itself:

    i) Equivalence of the law of Homosexuals to the Gentiles is their prohibition of Pedophilia. American child protection activists would call the authorities if Jews marry 6 y.o. virgin girl.
    The point is: there’s something similar on Jewish-Gentile laws regarding sexual perversions.

    If Jews agree to have the Torah law for themselves they can implement it.
    The cultural problem occurred when they tried to expand it to the Gentiles (that is, a fact how Jews refused to drive out all 7 Canaan tribes off the God’s land), which then prompted the angel of Jehovah to “give up” in Judge 2:3 (even though it is contradictory to a previous threat of Jehovah that the angel shall not pardon or leave their rebellion unpunished, Exo 23:21) at a place named Bochim. Ironically, as we know, the promise of driving out 7 Canaan tribes is supposed to be done by that angel himself (Exo 33:2), but then he gave up (Judge 2:3).
    Exo 33:2
    And I will send an angel before thee; and I will drive out the Canaanite, the Amorite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite:
    Exo 23:21
    Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him.
    vs.
    Jud 2
    1 And an angel of the LORD came up from Gilgal to Bochim, and said, I made you to go up out of Egypt, and have brought you unto the land which I sware unto your fathers; and I said, I will never break my covenant with you.2 And ye shall make no league with the inhabitants of this land; ye shall throw down their altars: but ye have not obeyed my voice: why have ye done this?

    The point is: The Torah law is too much flexible when it comes to the Gentiles.

    ii) Equivalence of the rest on Sabbath to the Gentiles is their national holiday. American nationalists would call the authorities if Jews play soccer on 4th July in the US.
    The point is: there’s something similar on Jewish-Gentile laws regarding holidays.

    iii) Equivalence of the unclean law to the Gentiles is their law of the protection on the endangered species. American activists would call the authorities if Jews wear the mantles and hats made of the skin of the bald eagle or panda or leopard around the US public.
    The point is: there’s something similar on Jewish-Gentile laws regarding treatment on the animals.

    iv) Equivalence of the law of farming to the Gentiles is their law of the prohibition on cultivating the cannabis, weed, opium poppy. Americans would call the authorities if Jews play plant the weed upon their synagogue’s yard on the American soil.
    The point is: there’s something similar on Jewish-Gentile laws regarding treatment on the farming.

    v) Equivalence of the Jewish slavery law to the Gentiles is their immigration law. American nationalists would call the authorities if Jews hired undocumented illegal immigrants for their synagogue in the US.
    The point is: there’s something similar on Jewish-Gentile laws regarding treatment on the lowly class of people.

    “The argument of Secularism
    http://www.equip.org/articles/president-bartlets-fallacious-diatribe/
    “Yes, it does!” he shouted. “Leviticus 18:22.” The president was just warming up. “I wanted to ask you a couple of questions while I had you here. I’m interested in selling my youngest daughter into slavery as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. She’s a Georgetown sophomore, speaks fluent Italian, always cleared the table when it was her turn. What would a good price for her be?”
    After a brief moment, he continued: “While thinking about that, can I ask another? My chief of staff, Leo McGarry, insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly says he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself or is it OK to call the police?”
    Now on a roll, the president steamed on triumphantly. “Here’s one that’s really important, ‘cause we’ve got a lot of sports fans in this town. Touching the skin of a dead pig makes one unclean, Leviticus 11:7. If they promise to wear gloves, can the Washington Redskins still play football? Can Notre Dame? Can West Point?
    “Does the whole town really have to be together to stone my brother John for planting different crops side by side?
    “Can I burn my mother in a small family gathering for wearing garments made from two different threads?
    The president paused to catch his breath. The silence that invaded the room was deafening. The once self-assured talk show host slowly rose to her feet, her face reddened with shame. Her quick come-backs and commanding presence wilted away. She had no response. The president of the United States had left her speechless. The very Bible that she had used to beat up on homosexuals had now beaten her into submissive silence.1″

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s