The biblical prohibition on killing human beings does not apply in Islam. It is reversed to a mandatory injunction to be obeyed until a specific state of affairs is achieved. There is much bloodshed to follow. This is just the beginning.

An Eye for an Eye

(Matthew 5:38-48; Luke 6:27-36)

Leviticus 24 v 17 And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death. 18 And he that killeth a beast shall make it good; beast for beast. 19 And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him; 20 Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again. 21 And he that killeth a beast, he shall restore it: and he that killeth a man, he shall be put to death.22 Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: for I am the LORD your God. 23 And Moses spake to the children of Israel, that they should bring forth him that had cursed out of the camp, and stone him with stones. And the children of Israel did as the LORD commanded Moses.

Islam on the other hand:

[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The biblical prohibition on killing human beings does not apply in Islam. It is reversed to a mandatory injunction to be obeyed until a specific state of affairs is achieved. There is much bloodshed to follow. This is just the beginning.

  1. θ says:

    In Islam, there’s no “obligation” to kill any Moslem. At most it is just a “permission” to shed the blood, that is to injure him. A permission is not obligation, hence that means there’s no sin if not carrying it out.
    Even the sin of apostasy that is the last action which differentiates a Moslem from Non-Moslem can be reduced into the exile. Stoning of adulterers (thru a difficult requirement of having 4 eyewitnesses) can still be aborted if they manage to flee or repent.
    A Moslem blasphemer is not punishable by the shedding of blood. But the fate of Non-Moslem blasphemers is left into the hands of Moslem executors.

    Sunan an-Nasa’i, Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4053
    It was narrated from ‘Aishah that: The Messenger of Allah said: It is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim except in three cases: An adulterer who had been married, who should be stoned (* to death*, which is additional notion by mistranslation); a man who killed another man intentionally, who should be killed; and a man who left Islam and waged war against Allah, the Might and Sublime, and His Messenger, who should be killed, or crucified, or banished from the land.

    أَخْبَرَنَا الْعَبَّاسُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الدُّورِيُّ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَامِرٍ الْعَقَدِيُّ، عَنْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ طَهْمَانَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ بْنِ رُفَيْعٍ، عَنْ عُبَيْدِ بْنِ عُمَيْرٍ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏ “‏ لاَ يَحِلُّ دَمُ امْرِئٍ مُسْلِمٍ إِلاَّ بِإِحْدَى ثَلاَثِ خِصَالٍ زَانٍ مُحْصَنٌ يُرْجَمُ أَوْ رَجُلٌ قَتَلَ رَجُلاً مُتَعَمِّدًا فَيُقْتَلُ أَوْ رَجُلٌ يَخْرُجُ مِنَ الإِسْلاَمِ يُحَارِبُ اللَّهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ وَرَسُولَهُ فَيُقْتَلُ أَوْ يُصْلَبُ أَوْ يُنْفَى مِنَ الأَرْضِ ‏”‏ ‏.‏

    Rajam doesn’t always mean stoning to death in Hadith.
    According to Hadith, the stoning punishment – Rajam – can be aborted or forfeited if the adulterer managed to run away despite bleeding.

    The Hadith is authentic because it is supported by the Arabic word “Rajam” in Qur’an that also doesn’t mean the “killing” or stoning to death, as Q.19, v.46 (stoning is a step before fleeing away alive) and 2. Q.36, v.18 (stoning is a step before another physical torture alive).

    Abu Dawud, Book 39, Hadith 4405.
    Narrated Nu’aym ibn Huzzal: He was then taken out to the Harrah, and while he was being stoned he felt the effect of the stones and could not bear it and fled. But Abdullah ibn Unays encountered him when those who had been stoning him could not catch up with him. He threw the bone of a camel’s foreleg at him, which hit him and killed him. They then went to the Prophet and reported it to him. He said: Why did you not leave him alone. Perhaps he might have repented and been forgiven by Allah.

    Jami’ at-Tirmidhi, Vol. 3, Book 15, Hadith 1428.
    Narrated Abu Hurairah: He was taken to Al-Harrah and stoned with rocks, he ran swiftly until he passed a man with a camel whip who beat him with it, and the people beat him until he died. They mentioned to the Messenger of Allah, that he ran upon feeling the rocks at the time of death. So the Messenger of Allah said: ‘Why didn’t you leave him?’”

  2. madmanna says:

    “In Islam, there’s no “obligation” to kill any Moslem. ”

    The text is commanding to kill non-Muslims, people of the book, Jews and Christians, because they are unbelievers.

  3. θ says:

    Qur’an infers in Q.5, v.48 it is not on the will of Moslems to achieve an utopia of one monolithic World Order. Jews and Christians have a great potency to have a righteous Common Ground with Moslems.

  4. Drew lappin says:

    Wouldn’t it be completely inconsistent to judge Islamists for killing in accordance with their prophets commandments when Moses did the same thing? Moses commanded not only the slaughter of non Jewish men, but also the specific slaughter of women and children captured in that war – DESPITE having earlier issued command from YHWH to not “killeth any man”.

    If Christians condemn Islamists as immoral for killing in accordance with their God and prophet, then they too must condemn Jewish Israelites as immoral for killing in accordance with their God and prophet. Which means if you condemn Allah and Muhammad you must also condemn Moses and YHWY.

    Muhammad attacked groups that didn’t believe what he believed, and so did Moses.
    Both in accordance with their God
    Both despite any prior condemnation of killing
    Both took war booty, including women
    Both preserved members of their theocracy
    Both killed people outside their theocracy (fueled by their religious convictions)
    Both extended, imposed and executed their religious judgments upon non compliant cultures

    It’s patently obvious both religions teach the prohibition of killing their own dedicated religious affiliates (excepting rule breakers, where the opposite is true), but certainly neither condemn killing in a religiously motivated invasion or imposition of another culture “war”. The opposite is demonstrably true.

    Numbers 31 ESV

    7 They (Israel) warred against Midian, as the Lord commanded Moses, and killed every male. 8 They killed the kings of Midian with the rest of their slain, Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba, the five kings of Midian. And they also killed Balaam the son of Beor with the sword. 9 And the people of Israel took captive the women of Midian and their little ones, and they took as plunder all their cattle, their flocks, and all their goods. 10 All their cities in the places where they lived, and all their encampments, they burned with fire, 11 and took all the spoil and all the plunder, both of man and of beast. 12 Then they brought the captives and the plunder and the spoil to Moses, and to Eleazar the priest, and to the congregation of the people of Israel, at the camp on the plains of Moab by the Jordan at Jericho.

    13 Moses and Eleazar the priest and all the chiefs of the congregation went to meet them outside the camp. 14 And Moses was angry with the officers of the army, the commanders of thousands and the commanders of hundreds, who had come from service in the war. 15 Moses said to them, “Have you let all the women live? 16 Behold, these, on Balaam’s advice, caused the people of Israel to act treacherously against the Lord in the incident of Peor, and so the plague came among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. 18 But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with him keep alive for yourselves. 19 Encamp outside the camp seven days. Whoever of you has killed any person and whoever has touched any slain, purify yourselves and your captives on the third day and on the seventh day.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Mehh, Muslim’s holy book has the story of Qadir who kills one innocent boy under the acknowledgement he will force his parents into apostasy.

  6. θ says:

    But Qur’an gives a sure sign that the person causes the dead fish to revive again, and he indicates that the boy was going to be revived again as a good child in Q18, v.81.
    So, it is a limited special case, only a mystical person whose caliber of Precognition is above Moses’ and normal people’s can defy the Scriptural law and goes unpunished.
    Precognition (from the Latin præ-, “before” and cognitio, “acquiring knowledge”), also called prescience, future vision, future sight is an alleged psychic ability to see events in the future.
    As with other forms of extrasensory perception, there is no reliable scientific evidence that precognition is a real ability possessed by anyone and it is widely considered to be pseudoscience. Specifically, precognition appears to violate the principle that an effect cannot occur before its cause.
    Despite the lack of scientific evidence, many people believe it is a real phenomenon. There are many reports of precognition and it remains a topic of research and discussion within the parapsychology community.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s