Islamic State stones four rape victims to death for “committing adultery”, by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch.org

From the perspective of Islamic law, if they tempted men to rape them, they are at fault, and must be punished. The rape must also have been public, since four male Muslim witnesses are required to have witnessed the act in order to establish it in Sharia court (cf. Qur’an 24:4, 24:14).

stoning in Mosul

“ISIS extremists stone four women to death on charges of ‘committing adultery,’” by Sarbaz Yousef, Ara News, February 12, 2016 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

ERBIL – The Islamic State (ISIS) has executed four women in the city of Mosul in Iraq’s northwestern Nineveh province, after accusing them of “committing adultery”, local sources reported on Thursday.

“The four victims were arrested earlier on wednesday [sic] in a raid by ISIS jihadis,” said Raafat Zarari, spokesman of the Nineveh media center.

“The jihadis claimed to have captured the women while committing adultery,” Zarari told ARA News in Mosul.

The ISIS-led Sharia Court issued a decision to publicly execute the four women, without mentioning any details about the men with whom the victims have supposedly committed adultery.

“The four women were stoned to death on Thursday in front of a large crowd of people in central Mosul,” Zarari reported.

Speaking to ARA News in Mosul, media activist Abdullah al-Malla said: “The four women were most likely exposed to sexual abuse at the hands of ISIS militants before being driven out of their homes and transferred to the Sharia Court.”

“The statement of the Sharia Court regarding the case of those four women has avoided mentioning the men who have been involved in the alleged adultery,” the source said. “Apparently, the victims have been raped by ISIS jihadis and then stoned to death on charges of committing adultery.”

COMMENTS

  1. Myrtle Linder says

    February 14, 2016 at 6:13 pm

    These blessed women who were so cruelly suffered rapt were punished with murder by self-righteous idiots. It is just an example of what our self righteous people are like, what we can expect out of them. At the judgment they will be on the receiving end of punishment, they will get theirs!!!

  2. Jay Boo says

    February 14, 2016 at 6:17 pm

    Muslims have been known to have stoned 13 year old rape victims to death even though this is supposedly against sharia. Islam is made for such duplicity.

    After all, Islam was made to excuse Muhammad’s despicable crimes against women.
    Muslims of today do the same and indirectly cover for Muhammad in the process.
    Pig Bath religion fact 101 — Muhammad was such a PIG

  3. Mark says

    February 14, 2016 at 6:17 pm

    The fact that the international court of justice the hague. sits empty and lights off, shows you that justice is a political football.

    Remember serbia and the officials brought to justice….

    Isis can do any act and not face justice… Our goverments are shamefull

  4. Jay Boo says

    February 14, 2016 at 6:35 pm

    The last hope of honor suffocates inside a raised self-righteous clench
    as Islam’s infected religion surrounds the honor-killing pit with its pious stench.
    The accused sinner is bound, and wrapped in a shroud of burial white;
    this alleged “gift” for Allah awaits greedy hands that grasp claim to human life.
    Another woman lowered to begin her undignified end.
    As if, honor might somehow rise unaware of what Islam truly intends.
    The first rock procured is seduced by a Qur’an’s deadly embrace.
    Her final breath secured when these two weapons are fondled with eager disgrace.

    Their knowing hush submits as remnants of truth remain silenced and bound.
    A first stone condemns, the others to convict with each hideous sound.
    Faith diseased, the tulip from within sprouts Islam’s demonic weed
    Haunting screams cry unheard in the vast emptiness of Muhammad’s vile creed.
    another bloodied white shroud writhing beneath Islam’s soiled veil of green.

  5. Phobic-ist says

    February 14, 2016 at 6:38 pm

    This atrocity will NOT feature heavily, if at all, on the MSM, God damn the leftist filth to hell….and where are the feministas? This is utterly sickening, and there can be no end to this evil until islam is eradicated from our planet!!!

  6. linnte says

    February 14, 2016 at 7:00 pm

    WHERE ARE THE WOMEN who stand up to men, but don’t say a WORD about this?? Toni Bugle calls them Feminatzies. As long as their comfy little world is good, to hell with others. Gloria Steinem WAKE up!

    • Tom says

      February 14, 2016 at 8:12 pm

      Lynne,

      I have previously stated this concept quite seriously and yet it has not caught traction. I firmly believe it is the heavy metal content of their drinking water through the formative years [0-15] that affects their cognitive processes and we are witnessing the end product.

      Your brain question directly relates to my hypothesis about heavy metals [lead, thallium, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, et al.] and cognitive dissonance. These people are incapable of rational thought, as they cannot think clearly due to heavy metal intrusion into the cerebellum, cerebrum and medulla oblongata.

      They know not to drink river or surface water, but choose to drink raw unprocessed, deep well water from the gift of Allah’s earth! Where abundant sources of petroleum [rock oil] hydrocarbons are present, geological formations rich in metals are frequently available.

      Next time you are wondering about why they act the way they do, consider my hypothesis.

        • Dr. Divinity says

          February 15, 2016 at 1:43 pm

          Who knows Wha’s in their drinking water …whether it’s in their water or inertial or driven.It It’s there and until they are subdued it will still be there. maybe
          during all of that oil drilling over there the drills have tapped into hell..Now how does one subdue such a devil contrived element is the question for today.

      • gravenimage says

        February 14, 2016 at 9:27 pm

        Tom wrote:

        I have previously stated this concept quite seriously and yet it has not caught traction. I firmly believe it is the heavy metal content of their drinking water through the formative years [0-15] that affects their cognitive processes and we are witnessing the end product…
        ……………………..

        Tom, are we to beleive that every single Muslim country from Aceh in Indonesia to Pakistan to Iran to Somalia to northern Nigeria to the Islamic State are *all* effected by heavy metals in the drinking water?

        Besides, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists and others living in these lands are not so effected, even though they drink the same water.

        Moreover, Muslim converts in places like Europe and North America–which have excellent and very pure drinking water–are just as violent as their counterparts in Dar-al-Islam.

        This is more about ideology than it is about unsafe drinking water.

        • Anne Smith says

          February 15, 2016 at 6:05 am

          Yes, consanguinity over hundreds of years has resulted in a mentally deficient bunch of savages. Look out Germany, this is your future, Merkel has doomed you.

      • Rod Houston says

        February 15, 2016 at 8:17 am

        Not true, we now have western born muslim biggots, who have drunk from the same supply we enjoy yet they practice their vile beliefs just the same

      • Isabellathecrusader says

        February 15, 2016 at 10:24 am

        Possible, but more likely a reaction to being raped as little boys.

        We need to destroy these barbarians. Eradicate them from the earth. The current batch cannot be brought to behave properly so they’ve got to go.

      • ninetyninepct says

        February 15, 2016 at 11:50 am

        Deeper water makes sense, although people around the world didn’t know why. Animals and people congregate around water sources, eat and then the human and animal manure is also concentrated there. “Surface” water is likely polluted whereas deep water has a better chance of being cleaner.

    • Panmelia says

      February 15, 2016 at 6:02 am

      “Where are their brains?”
      I think we know where muslim men’s brains are. As for their minds, they are indoctrinated, warped, distorted and criminalised by the shockingly hateful rubbish in the koran, haditha etc that they have had stuffed and beaten into them since early childhood.

      This curse on the planet needs to be eradicated. The first step is to expel all muslims from Western countries and burn every last koran to show them what we think of their religion and plans for world domination.

      When all the muslims are coralled in their countries of origin, they will begin to fight each other for not being muslim enough until their countries are ruined and even more backward than they are now.

      Meanwhile, in the West, we need to develop enough military heavy duty hardware and impenetrable borders to deter even the most devout islamist from even DREAMING about conquering the world and establishing a caliphate.

      • DFD says

        February 15, 2016 at 10:28 am

        Panmelia says:
        ““Where are their brains?” I think we know where muslim men’s brains are….”

        – What brains? They have devolved into a state were their thinking is done with their thingies

        “This curse on the planet needs to be eradicated. The first step is to expel all muslims from Western countries…”

        – Agreed, and level every mosque.

        “…and burn every last koran to show…”

        – Disagree. We’ll degenerate into a bunch of book burners. Let’s teach about that in schools, as we ought to teach about Mein Kampf and Das Kapital. That way round we inoculate the children.

        “When all the muslims are coralled in their countries of origin, they will begin to fight each other for not being muslim enough until their countries are ruined… “

        – Yes and no, they already fight each other, unless there are Christian and/or other minorities to persecute. I believe instead of corralling them into their countries of origin, it would be much better to relocate them into secure territories, reserved lands that is, and call these ‘Caliphates’. No further interference from us thereafter. Thus Allah will help them into happy lives – may be, if he so wills.

  7. Nimrod says

    February 14, 2016 at 7:58 pm

    So basically under sharia if a man wants a woman he doesn’t like to get executed then all he has to do is be willing to endure 100 lashes and rape her in public. He will get lashed and she will be executed.

    • gravenimage says

      February 14, 2016 at 8:02 pm

      There will be no lashes here, Nimrod. Jihadists raping their victims–even if the victims are Muslim–is perfectly Halal.

  8. gravenimage says

    February 14, 2016 at 8:00 pm

    “Apparently, the victims have been raped by ISIS jihadis and then stoned to death on charges of committing adultery.”
    …………………………..

    This would not surprise me. As Jay Boo notes, this is not the first time pious Muslims have stoned rape victims to death:

    “Amnesty International: ‘Woman’ stoned to death in Somalia was 13-year-old rape victim”

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/11/amnesty-international-woman-stoned-to-death-in-somalia-was-13-year-old-rape-victim

    And if the victims were raped by ISIS Jihadists, they can act with impunity, since raping Infidels or the “insufficiently Islamic” is in Jihad is perfectly Islamic.

    These poor women–first raped by Jihadists, then stoned because being raped means to be guilty of “Zina”–unlawful sexual congress–even though they were not willing participants.

    God, I hate Islam.

    • Nimrod says

      February 14, 2016 at 11:27 pm

      I think you are probably right. They probably just refused to participate in the “sexual jihad” as Islamic comfort women. If they had just agreed to the temporary sex contract (Nikah) they’d probably still be alive.

      Islam can’t crawl back into its hole between the two mosques like a snake soon enough.

  9. Gary says

    February 14, 2016 at 8:16 pm

    Oh Muslims males. How delicate and fragile your egos…..

    This has nothing to do with “committing adultery” and EVERYTHING to do with four women who had the courage to resist the degrading behavior of Muslim pigs.

  10. Hope says

    February 14, 2016 at 8:17 pm

    Where are Hillary and her little Muslim puppet sidekick? No shock? No outrage? I thought they were all about women’s rights? Somehow, Islamic abuse of women always gets a free pass from these fu**ed up liberals.

    • Robert says

      February 14, 2016 at 9:34 pm

      That Is THE Most Important QUESTION OF ALL – For 7 YEARS She WAS Secretary Of STATE Of The United States of America…

      And NOW Running To Be President – You Liberals ARE Pathetic I Can NO Longer Be In The Same Room With Ya’s..!

  11. D-spot says

    February 15, 2016 at 2:16 am

    In 2004 in the modern day city of Marseilles a woman was stoned to death Robert Spencer wrote on JW – were there any prosecutions, any justice, anybody notice? This is just business as usual for these excuses for men, and they are here in our country. We are not immune, and what will we do when it happens here?

    • Charli Main says

      February 15, 2016 at 10:44 am

      @ D-spot
      Marseilles has a Muslim population in excess of 40% and is leading the race to become Europe´s first Muslim majority city. Marseilles also had the dubious honour of being the most dangerous city in Europe. Entire sections of the city cannot be accessed without passing through Muslim manned road blocks.
      French law has next to no remit in this city which is affectively a satellite of Algeria, subject to Sharia law

  12. duh_swami says

    February 15, 2016 at 7:02 am

    Quran 8:17….9″123…applied to zina…I got that from the’ perverted version of Islam…I asked Satan why he supported these people , he said he doesn’t, they throw rocks at him at Mecca and conduct Satanic rituals behind his back…
    He wasn’t aware of these stonings until I told him…He said, ‘see, there they go again’…Then he stormed off in a huff…

    • DFD says

      February 15, 2016 at 10:41 am

      duh_swami says: “…I got that from the’ perverted version of Islam……Then he stormed off in a huff…

      Brilliant! Why didn’t I think of that? Hopefully it has nothing to with having brains and beauty…

      At long last, no I know where the expression “Poor devil” comes from.

  13. dumbledoresarmy says

    February 15, 2016 at 7:26 am

    The thing is: a woman or girl doesn’t need to have actually *done* anything.

    She can be raped, and then accused of having committed zina. But she need not have been raped, nor indeed have had anything happen to her, or have actually done anything anyone in any other society would regard as a sin or a crime or even a minor moral slip. She can be a totally submissive meek cipher covered up in a burka and locked up in purdah and STILL be – totally falsely – accused of ‘zina’ out of the blue, by any person (male or female) who just decides they want her dead. Sometimes she will then be torturously murdered “privately” in an ‘honour’ murder, by her own family, perhaps her father, her mother, her brother/s. Or she can, somewhere like Islamic State, be ritually and torturously murdered *publicly*, by a huge baying male mob who are getting off on the sadistic destruction of a female body.

    Every female in every Islamic society exists, from birth, with a temporarily-suspended sentence of “Death: for the Mortal Sin of Being Female” hanging over her head; and the suspension can be ended at any moment by any other Muslim, whether male *or* female, who decides so to do. I would hazard the guess that many a Mohammedan female is sentenced to death by the sovereign court of village gossip… whether male or female.

    And when a woman or girl is raped – quite often incestuously by father, uncle, brother/s or cousin/s – it is often the rapist himself who carries out the ‘honour’ murder or, in a place like Islamic State – is probably right there at the front of the mob throwing the rocks in the public execution, or, rather, ritual human sacrifice. Rape; then murder.

    Islam, the sharia, is a psycho serial killer’s *dream* system. It offers so many, many opportunities to indulge the lust to kill.

  14. bostongal912 says

    February 15, 2016 at 9:00 am

    These Muslims are completely nuts!! Not to mention mean, sadistic and cruel!!! I guess I don’t understand how so many people can follow this bullcrap! Even their Imans preach hate! The so called moderate ones do nothing to teach these nuts that killing innocent people is wrong! The way they treat women is deplorable! How can Osama Obama think bringing them here is a good idea!! It’s going to get worse that’s for sure! They don’t assimilate bottom line!

  15. Troy says

    February 15, 2016 at 10:13 am

    This is the religion that entices the likes of Mike Tyson, the rapist and wife beater…and western society accepts this as a ‘religion of Peace’? ….

  16. Isabellathecrusader says

    February 15, 2016 at 10:31 am

    Look at the picture. Look at the ratio, 500 guys to four helpless girls. Muslim men really are the most pathetic cowards.

    Why is it that Muslims don’t have to control their anger or behave properly around other human beings? Why do we let them get away with this? Because they are bullies? The proper way to deal with a bully that rapes and kills girls is to take a baseball bat and slam them in the face with it. Repeat. Then repeat again. Then you can reason with them.

    • DFD says

      February 15, 2016 at 10:52 am

      Isabellathecrusader says : “… Then you can reason with them.”

      Dear Isabella,

      May I ask what for? We tried to reason with them for the last 1,400+ years. Put away the base ball bats (besides, it would be one-sided since we Euros don’t play baseball), and replace these with the following items: Napalm, Phosphor, TNT, Torpex, FAE’s, plus some others. That’s the only reasoning they understand.

      Good handle you took for yourself, keep on crusading.

  17. Isabellathecrusader says

    February 15, 2016 at 10:38 am

    Could any of you here imagine burying a girl in a hole up to her neck and then throwing even one stone at her head? Okay, how about just throwing a stone at someone’s head? Even if you were furious with them, your reaction to their reaction of getting hit and having blood spew and the pained look on their face would horrify you and make you feel sorry you did it immediately. Something is seriously wrong with Muslims who don’t see any problem with this. They can’t live with us in our society because we aren’t safe when they do. They’ve got to go, anyway you want to do it. And we the people need to let our leaders know they will pay if they don’t listen to us this time.

  18. Bukkdem Jizheads says

    February 15, 2016 at 1:21 pm

    How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. -Winston Churchill

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Islamic State stones four rape victims to death for “committing adultery”, by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch.org

  1. θ says:

    In the “blame business”, the stoning punishment of adulteress is just act of obedience to what Moses wrote in Torah.
    Non-Moslems blame Prophet Muhammad, but Moslems point out Moses of starting the jurisprudence. Therefore why does the blame just stop at Islamic Prophet?

    Rajam is not Qur’anic penalty. Even there is a proof that Umar knows Rajam (stoning punishment) is not a part of Qur’an, but additional ruling to it.
    Abi Dawud 4418.
    ‘Abd Allah b. ‘Abbas said: I swear by Allah, had it not been so that the people might say: ‘Umar made an addition to Allah’s Book, I would have written it (there).

  2. madmanna says:

    ‘Abd Allah b. ‘Abbas said: I swear by Allah, had it not been so that the people might say: ‘Umar made an addition to Allah’s Book, I would have written it (there).

    He was foiled perhaps but how many others succeeded?

    ” is not a part of Qur’an, but additional ruling to it.”

    Additional but contradictory. Allah is suppliant. For 5 shots a day he will allow Muslims to do anything.

  3. θ says:

    “madmanna says: had it not been so that the people might say: ‘Umar made an addition to Allah’s Book, I would have written it (there). He was foiled perhaps but how many others succeeded?”

    Rajam is a valid penalty of adulteress in both Torah and Gospel. Moslems are allowed to use the penal code of previous Scriptures. Beside rajam, there’s Biblical enslavement.
    In Qur’an, the enslavement is caused only by war, there’s no other way. But in the Bible, the enslavement can be caused by:
    – crime of robbery (Exo 22:3 if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft).
    – Unpaid debts of father (Exod 21:7).
    – being strangers or refugees (story of Jews in Egypt).
    – child abandonment (story of Joseph).
    – being a royal gift (story of Hagar).
    In the Bible, it is not improper to depict God as Jewish slave-trader (Judges 4:2, And the LORD sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan, that reigned in Hazor).

  4. madmanna says:

    “In the Bible, it is not improper to depict God as Jewish slave-trader (Judges 4:2, And the LORD sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan, that reigned in Hazor).”

    That’s a figure of speech.

    “In Qur’an, the enslavement is caused only by war, there’s no other way. But in the Bible, the enslavement can be caused by:”

    That’s not true. Arab Muslims bought black slaves from Africa and shipped them to Arabia by the thousands before there was any Atlantic slave trade.

    The slaves of the bible are free to run away and can not be compelled to return to their master:

    Deut 23 v 15 Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee:

    16 He shall dwell with thee, even among you, in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh him best: thou shalt not oppress him.

    In other words the master must treat his servant well in order to keep him.

    The Islamic slave is a chattel slave with no rights whatsoever.

    The slave under the law of Moses had to be freed in the seventh year and in the year of jubilee.

    Every seventh year there was a debt amnesty. This would also prevent people from falling in to slavery.

    The Seventh Year

    (Exodus 23:10-13; Leviticus 25:1-7)

    1At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release. 2And this is the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbour shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called the LORD’S release. 3 Of a foreigner thou mayest exact it again: but that which is thine with thy brother thine hand shall release; 4 Save when there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it:

    Release of Hebrew Servants

    (Exodus 21:1-11)

    12 And if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee. 13 And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty: 14 Thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of thy floor, and out of thy winepress: of that wherewith the LORD thy God hath blessed thee thou shalt give unto him. 15 And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt, and the LORD thy God redeemed thee: therefore I command thee this thing to day. 16 And it shall be, if he say unto thee, I will not go away from thee; because he loveth thee and thine house, because he is well with thee; 17 Then thou shalt take an aul, and thrust it through his ear unto the door, and he shall be thy servant for ever. And also unto thy maidservant thou shalt do likewise.

    The slave has no rights in Islam and is just a piece of property.

  5. madmanna says:

    “Rajam is a valid penalty of adulteress in both Torah and Gospel.”

    I agree but where are the men who participated in the act?

    It’s significant that you don’t refer to the male adulterer only to the adulteress.

  6. θ says:

    “madmanna says: That’s not true. Arab Muslims bought black slaves from Africa and shipped them to Arabia by the thousands before there was any Atlantic slave trade.The slaves of the bible are free to run away and can not be compelled to return to their master:Deut 23 v 15 Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee:”

    Similar to Rajam, the method of Biblical enslavement is “permitted” for Moslems to follow despite not being mentioned by Qur’an. The point is to put the responsibility back on Moses and Jews.
    For Moslems it is a comparison between a mercy in Qur’an and penalty in the Bible.
    For Non-Moslems, it is a comparison between obedience of Prophet Muhammad and responsibility of Moses.

  7. madmanna says:

    ” The point is to put the responsibility back on Moses and Jews.
    For Moslems it is a comparison between a mercy in Qur’an and penalty in the Bible.
    For Non-Moslems, it is a comparison between obedience of Prophet Muhammad and responsibility of Moses.”

    Which mercy is in contrast to which penalty? Can you be specific? Mercy and penalty in regard to what act of conduct? What are you referring to?

    What comparison between Mohammed and Moses? In respect of which acts of conduct?

  8. θ says:

    By mercy, any married woman can escape the accusation of adultery by taking a simple self-oath 4 times against 4 eyewitnesses. But in he Bible it doesn’t exist.
    By mercy, Qur’an penalises adulteress with scourging, hence sparing her life. But the Bible penalises adulteress with stoning, hence taking off her life.
    By mercy, to carry out the scourging, Qur’an requires 4 eyewitnesses, but to carry out the stoning the Bible just requires 2 witnesses.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s