If this is a Muslim man reminding an infidel woman that her movements and appearance don’t conform to Sharia law then Allah and Mohammed will be pleased with him and reward him

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Islam covers and chaperones the woman to prevent her from communicating with non-Muslims and Muslims outside her immediate family. This was probably a tactic that Mohammed first employed in Medina to separate all female Muslims from the influence of non-Muslims, at that time mainly Jews. Islam exceeds the limits to ensure that it has complete control over it’s females

13646: Confused about women covering their faces


First of all I must make clear that I have read your articles related to this topic. Although I have heard other evidences to suggest that the FACE veil is optional, due to the following:
(1)When the ayah was revealed commanding the believing women to cover (24:31) only the wives of the prophet covered themselves with a facial veil. The other Muslim women did not take steps to veil their faces.
(2)When some of the sahabah intended to propose to a women they would go and look at her without her knowledge. And of course if she had worn a facial veil they would not have been able to see her?
This topic is causing me much confusion please clarify the importance of the niqaab, I only want to do the correct thing for the sake of Allah.

Published Date: 2003-01-13

Praise be to Allaah.  Firstly:

We appreciate your keenness to find out the truth and follow it, and we ask Allaah to show us the truth as truth and enable us to follow it, and to show us falsehood as false and enable us to avoid it. The correct view regarding this matter is that it is obligatory for women to cover all of their bodies in front of men. See question no. 21134.

Secondly:

Your saying that “the rest of the Muslim women did not cover their faces” is not correct. Rather the command to observe full hijab applied to the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his daughters and the believing women. The evidence for that is the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies (i.e. screen themselves completely except the eyes or one eye to see the way). That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allaah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful”

[al-Ahzaab 33:59]

And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)”

[al-Noor 24:31]

The command in these two verses is general and applies to all believing women.

Al- Bukhaari narrated that ‘Aa’ishah said: “May Allaah have mercy on the first Muhaajir women. When Allaah revealed the words ‘and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)’ they tore their aprons and covered their faces with them.” See also question no. 6991.

Abu Dawood (4101) narrated that Umm Salamah said: “When the words ‘to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies’ [al-Ahzaab 33:59] were revealed, the women of the Ansaar went out looking as if there were crows on their heads because of the covering.” Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.

The Muhaajir and Ansaari women obeyed this command and covered their faces.

Thirdly:

With regard to a man looking at the woman to whom he wishes to propose marriage, this is part of the Sunnah. Abu Dawood (1783) narrated that Jaabir ibn ‘Abd-Allaah said: “The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: ‘When any one of you wants to propose marriage to a woman, if he can look at that which will motivate him to go ahead and marry her, then let him do so.’ I proposed marriage to a girl and I used to hide myself until I saw that which motivated me to go ahead and marry her, then I married her.” Classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood, no. 1832. In the report narrated by Ibn Maajah it says that he hid in her garden to see her.

This hadeeth indicates that the women of the Sahaabah used to cover their faces, because if it had been the custom for women to uncover their faces, there would have been no need to hide, because he would have been able to see her in any place if she had been uncovering her face.

But because it was the custom for women to cover their faces, he needed to hide. It is well known that if there are no non-mahram men around, a woman does not cover her face, such as when she is in her house or in her garden, as in this hadeeth.

And Allaah knows best.

21134: Do women have to wear niqaab?


Is wearing niqaab one of the conditions of Islamic dress for women?

Published Date: 2009-03-07

Praise be to Allaah.

Hijaab in Arabic means covering or concealing. Hijaab is the name of something that is used to cover. Everything that comes between two things is hijaab.

Hijaab means everything that is used to cover something and prevent anyone from reaching it, such as curtains, door keepers and garments, etc.

Khimaar comes from the word khamr, the root meaning of which is to cover. For example, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Khammiru aaniyatakum (cover your vessels).” Everything that covers something else is called its khimaar.

But in common usage khimaar has come to be used as a name for the garment with which a woman covers her head; in some cases this does not go against the linguistic meaning of khimaar.

Some of the fuqahaa’ have defined it as that which covers the head, the temples and the neck.

The difference between the hijaab and the khimaar is that the hijaab is something which covers all of a woman’s body, whilst the khimaar in general is something with which a woman covers her head.

Niqaab is that with which a woman veils her face (tantaqib)…

The difference between hijaab and niqaab is that the hijaab is that which covers all the body, whilst niqaab is that which covers a woman’s face only.

The woman’s dress as prescribed in sharee’ah (“Islamic dress”) is that which covers her head, face and all of her body.

But the niqaab or burqa’ – which shows the eyes of the woman – has become widespread among women, and some of them do not wear it properly.  Some scholars have forbidden wearing it on the grounds that it is not Islamic in origin, and because it is used improperly and people treat it as something insignificant, demonstrating negligent attitudes towards it and using new forms of niqaab which are not prescribed in Islam, widening the opening for the eyes so that the cheeks, nose and part of the forehead are also visible.

Therefore, if the woman’s niqaab or burqa’ does not show anything but the eyes, and the opening is only as big as the left eye, as was narrated from some of the salaf, then that is permissible, otherwise she should wear something which covers her face entirely.

Shaykh Muhammad al-Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

The hijaab prescribed in sharee’ah means that a woman should cover everything that it is haraam for her to show, i.e., she should cover that which it is obligatory for her to cover, first and foremost of which is the face, because it is the focus of temptation and desire.

A woman is obliged to cover her face in front of anyone who is not her mahram (blood relative to whom marriage is forbidden). From this we learn that the face is the most essential thing to be covered. There is evidence from the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the views of the Sahaabah and the imams and scholars of Islam, which indicates that women are obliged to cover all of their bodies in front of those who are not their mahrams.

Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/ 391, 392)

Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

The correct view as indicated by the evidence is that the woman’s face is ‘awrah which must be covered. It is the most tempting part of her body, because what people look at most is the face, so the face is the greatest ‘awrah of a woman. This is in addition to the shar’i evidence which states that it is obligatory to cover the face.

For example, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer palms of hands or one eye or dress like veil, gloves, headcover, apron), and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)…”

[al-Noor 24:31]       

Drawing the veil all over the juyoob implies covering the face.

When Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) was asked about the aayah (interpretation of the meaning):

“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies”

[al-Ahzaab 33:59] – 

he covered his face, leaving only one eye showing. This indicates that what was meant by the aayah was covering the face. This was the interpretation of Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) of this aayah, as narrated from him by ‘Ubaydah al-Salmaani when he asked him about it.

In the Sunnah there are many ahaadeeth, such as: the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The woman in ihraam is forbidden to veil her face (wear niqaab) or to wear the burqa’.” This indicates that when women were not in ihraam, women used to cover their faces.

This does not mean that if a woman takes off her niqaab or burqa’ in the state of ihraam that she should leave her face uncovered in the presence of non-mahram men. Rather she is obliged to cover it with something other than the niqaab or burqa’, on the evidence of the hadeeth of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) who said: “We were with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in ihraam, and when men passed by us, we would lower the khimaar on our heads over our faces, and when they moved on we would lift it again.”

Women in ihraam and otherwise are obliged to cover their faces in front of non-mahram men, because the face is the center of beauty and it is the place that men look at… and Allaah knows best.

Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/396, 397

He also said:

It is OK to cover the face with the niqaab or burqa’ which has two openings for the eyes only, because this was known at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and because of necessity. If nothing but the eyes show, this is fine, especially if this is customarily worn by women in her society.

Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 1/399

And Allaah knows best.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Suffering Servant of Isaiah 53 is the antipode of the islamic prophet Mohammed

The Suffering Servant

(Matthew 26:57-68; Mark 14:53-65; John 18:19-24; 1 Peter 2:21-25)

1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?

2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.

3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.

4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.

5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.

7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.

8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.

A Grave Assigned

(Matthew 27:57-61; Mark 15:42-47; Luke 23:50-56; John 19:38-42)

9 And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.

10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.

11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.

12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Dr Zakir Naik or Christian Prince you decide who is right about the six or eight day creation of the Koran

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

WCOF on the Sacraments, the Lord’s Supper and Baptism

Chapter XXVII – Of the Sacraments.

  1. Sacraments are holy signs and seals of the covenant of grace,(1) immediately instituted by God,(2) to represent Christ, and His benefits; and to confirm our interest in Him:(3) as also, to put a visible difference between those that belong unto the Church, and the rest of the world;(4) and solemnly to engage them to the service of God in Christ, according to His Word.(5)
  • Ro 4:11; Ge 17:7,10; see the refs. for section 2 below.
  • Mt 28:19; 1Co 11:23
  • 1Co 10:16; 1Co 11:25,26; Gal 3:27; Gal 3:17
  • Ro 15:8; Ex 12:48; Ge 34:14
  • Ro 6:3,4; 1Co 10:16
  1. There is, in every sacrament, a spiritual relation, or sacramental union, between the sign and the thing signified: whence it comes to pass, that the names and effects of the one are attributed to the other.(1)
    • Ge 17:10; Mt 26:27,28; Tit 3:5
  • The grace which is exhibited in or by the sacraments rightly used, is not conferred by any power in them; neither doth the efficacy of a sacrament depend upon the piety or intention of him that doth administer it:(1) but upon the work of the Spirit,(2) and the word of institution, which contains, together with a precept authorizing the use thereof, a promise of benefit to worthy receivers.(3)
    • Ro 2:28,29; 1Pe 3:21
    • Mt 3:11; 1Co 12:13
    • Mt 26:27,28; Mt 28:19,20
  1. There be only two sacraments ordained by Christ our Lord in the Gospel; that is to say, Baptism, and the Supper of the Lord: neither of which may be dispensed by any, but by a minister of the Word lawfully ordained.(1)
    • Mt 28:19; 1Co 11:20,23; 1Co 4:1; Heb 5:4
  1. The sacraments of the old testament, in regard of the spiritual things thereby signified and exhibited, were, for substance, the same with those of the new.(1)
    • 1Co 10:1-4

Chapter XXVIII – Of Baptism.

  1. Baptism is a sacrament of the new testament, ordained by Jesus Christ,(1) not only for the solemn admission of the party baptized into the visible Church;(2) but also, to be unto him a sign and seal of the covenant of grace,(3) of his ingrafting into Christ,(4) of regeneration,(5) of remission of sins,(6) and of his giving up unto God, through Jesus Christ, to walk in newness of life.(7) Which sacrament is, by Christ’s own appointment, to be continued in His Church until the end of the world.(8)
  • Mt 28:19
  • 1Co 12:13
  • Ro 4:11 with Col 2:11,12
  • Gal 3:27; Ro 6:5
  • Tit 3:5
  • Mk 1:4
  • Ro 6:3,4
  • Mt 28:19,20
  1. The outward element to be used in this sacrament is water, wherewith the party is to be baptized, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, by a minister of the Gospel, lawfully called thereunto.(1)
    • Mt 3:11; Jn 1:33; Mt 28:19,20
  • Dipping of the person into the water is not necessary; but Baptism is rightly administered by pouring, or sprinkling water upon the person.(1)
    • Heb 9:10,19,20,21,22; Ac 2:41; Ac 16:33; Mk 7:4
  1. Not only those that do actually profess faith in the obedience unto Christ,(1) but also the infants of one, or both, believing parents, are to be baptized.(2)
    • Mk 16:15,16; Ac 8:37,38
    • Ge 17:7,9 with Gal 3:9,14 and Col 2:11,12; and Ac 2:38,39; and Ro 4:11,12; 1Co 7:14; Mt 28:19; Mk 10:13-16; Lk 18:15
  1. Although it be a great sin to contemn or neglect this ordinance,(1) yet grace and salvation are not so inseparably annexed unto it, as that no person can be regenerated or saved, without it;(2) or, that all that are baptized are undoubtedly regenerated.(3)
    • Lk 7:30 with Ex 4:24-26
    • Ro 4:11; Ac 10:2,4,22,31,45,47
    • Ac 8:13,23
  1. The efficacy of Baptism is not tied to that moment of time wherein it is administered;(1) yet, not withstanding, by the right use of this ordinance, the grace promised is not only offered, but really exhibited, and conferred, by the Holy Ghost, to such (whether of age or infants) as that grace belongeth unto, according to the counsel of God’s own will, in His appointed time.(2)
    • Jn 3:5,8
    • Gal 3:27; Tit 3:5; Eph 5:25,26; Ac 2:38,41
  • The sacrament of Baptism is but once to be administered unto any person.(1)
    • Tit 3:5

Chapter XXIX – Of the Lord’s Supper.

  1. Our Lord Jesus, in the night wherein He was betrayed, instituted the sacrament of His body and blood, called the Lord’s Supper, to be observed in His Church, unto the end of the world for the perpetual remembrance of the sacrifice of Himself in His death, the sealing all benefits thereof unto true believers, their spiritual nourishment and growth in Him, their further engagement in and to all duties which they owe unto Him; and, to be a bond and pledge of their communion with Him, and with each other, as members of His mystical body.(1)
  • 1Co 11:23-26; 1Co 10:16,17,21; 1Co 12:13
  1. In this sacrament, Christ is not offered up to His Father; not any real sacrifice made at all, for remission of sins of the quick or dead;(1) but only a commemoration of that one offering up of Himself, by Himself, upon the cross, once for all: and a spiritual oblation of all possible praise unto God, for the same,(2) so that the popish sacrifice of the mass (as they call it) is most abominably injurious to Christ’s one, only sacrifice, the alone propitiation for all the sins of His elect.(3)
  • Heb 9:22,25,26,28
  • 1Co 11:24,25,26; Mt 26:26,27
  • Heb 7:23,24,27; Heb 10:11,12,14,18
  • The Lord Jesus hath, in his ordinance, appointed His ministers to declare His word of institution to the people; to pray, and bless the elements of bread and wine, and thereby to set them apart from a common to an holy use; and to take and break bread, to take the cup and (they communicating also themselves) to give both to the communicants;(1) but to none who are not then present in the congregation.(2)
    • Mt 26:26,27,28 and Mk 14:22-24 and Lk 22:19,20 with 1Co 11:23-26
    • Ac 20:7; 1Co 11:20
  1. Private masses, or receiving this sacrament by a priest, or any other, alone,(1) as likewise, the denial of the cup to the people,(2) worshipping the elements, the lifting them up, or carrying them about, for adoration, and the reserving them for any pretended religious use; are all contrary to the nature of this sacrament, and to the institution of Christ.(3)
  • 1Co 10:6
  • Mk 14:23; 1Co 11:25-29
  • Mt 15:9
  1. The outward elements in this sacrament, duly set apart to the uses ordained by Christ, have such relation to Him crucified, as that, truly, yet sacramentally only, they are sometimes called by the name of the things they represent, to wit, the body and blood of Christ;(1) albeit, in substance and nature, they still remain truly and only bread and wine, as they were before.(2)
    • Mt 26:26-28
    • 1Co 11:26,27,28; Mt 26:29
  1. That doctrine which maintains a change of the substance of bread and wine, into the substance of Christ’s body and blood (commonly called transubstantiation) by consecration of a priest, or by any other way, is repugnant, not to Scripture alone, but even to common sense, and reason; overthroweth the nature of the sacrament, and hath been, and is, the cause of manifold superstitions; yea, of gross idolatries.(1)
  • Ac 3:21 with 1Co 11:24-26; Lk 24:6
  • Worthy receivers, outwardly partaking of the visible elements, in this sacrament,(1) do then also, inwardly by faith, really and indeed, yet not carnally and corporally but spiritually, receive, and feed upon, Christ crucified, and all benefits of His death: the body and blood of Christ being then, not corporally or carnally, in, with, or under the bread and wine; yet, as really, but spiritually, present to the faith of believers in that ordinance, as the elements themselves are to their outward senses.(2)
    • 1Co 11:28
    • 1Co 10:16
  • Although ignorant and wicked men receive the outward elements in this sacrament; yet, they receive not the thing signified thereby; but, by their unworthy coming thereunto, are guilty of the body and blood of the Lord, to their own damnation. Wherefore, all ignorant and ungodly persons, as they are unfit to enjoy communion with Him, so are they unworthy of the Lord’s table and cannot, without great sin against Christ, while they remain such, partake of these holy mysteries,(1) or be admitted thereunto.(2)
    • 1Co 11:27,28,29; 2Co 6:14-16
    • 1Co 5:6,7,13; 2Th 3:6,14,15; Mt 7:6
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

On the For Freedom march in Copenhagen Saturday, one cop almost danced to the carols. A post from the VladTepesBlog.com blog

In a way this video shows the tragedy of the loss of classical civilization the most of all of them.

Look at what the leftists and muslims are so violently opposed to.

People doing a Danish Christmas event, songs, cookies and so on, in a part of the capital of Denmark where Muslims live in high concentration.

That preventing this with violence can somehow be a good thing.

Perhaps this video shows most of all who the tolerant and intolerant are.

Danes exercising their own culture in their own land, will not be tolerated by Muslims or leftists.

Everyone else, doing any non-Western culture, will be protected speech and any objections, or even revealing truths about those cultural or religious aspects will lead to hate crimes charges.

Case closed. Or as the kids say, “mic drop”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Uganda: Muslims beat former Muslim sheikh unconscious, destroy his crops for converting to Christianity, a post from JihadWatch.org, with comments

The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law. It’s based on the Qur’an: “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.” (Qur’an 4:89)

A hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him” (Bukhari 9.84.57). The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law according to all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence.

This is still the position of all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence, both Sunni and Shi’ite. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”

Qaradawi also once famously said: “If they had gotten rid of the apostasy punishment, Islam wouldn’t exist today.”

malik-higenyi-home

“Former Muslim Sheikh in Eastern Uganda Attacked for Embracing Christianity,” Morning Star News, November 30, 2016:

NAIROBI, Kenya (Morning Star News) – Muslim villagers in eastern Uganda on Nov. 23 destroyed the maize crops of a former Islamic sheikh (teacher) in eastern Uganda who was beaten unconscious after revealing his faith in Christ, sources said.

The day before his fields were destroyed, 30-year-old Malik Higenyi of Bufuja village, Butaleja District, received threatening messages on his mobile phone, he told Morning Star News.

“Be informed that you risk your life and that of the entire family if you happen to come back to your house,” read one anonymous text. “We curse you and your family. You are an apostate according to Islamic law, and you deserve to die.”

Higenyi, who along with his wife and two children secretly embraced Christ on April 16, made an open confession of faith at his church on Nov. 13. News of his confession reached a mosque in nearby Lubanga village immediately, sources said.

“Before reaching my house, suddenly I was attacked by three people,” he told Morning Star News. “They started shouting, saying I am a disgrace to the Muslim fraternity of Lubanga mosque.”

Higenyi suffered a head wound and a broken bone in his right hand.

“The attackers hit me with a blunt object, and I fell down and did not know what happened from there,” he said. “I just found myself at Bufuja health center.”

Relatives ostracized him, and Local County 1 Chairman Walubi Mailadi supported their opposition to his conversion, sources said. Fearing attacks, he and his family have been unable to return to their thatched-roof home.

The family received Christ when a local pastor (name withheld for security reasons) visited his home and discipled him the following months.

Since Higenyi’s public confession, Muslims from Lubanga mosque have been holding meetings to discuss his punishment, and after Friday prayer meetings they have issued harsh statements against apostates, sources said.

Higenyi and his family are now without a home and have taken refuge at an undisclosed location….

EU official’s daughter murdered by Muslim migrant worked in refugee homes
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Keith Ellison: Perfect for the DNC
Angemon says
  1. MRR says

    December 5, 2016 at 9:43 am

    I’M STARTING TO THINK WE MAY HAVE REACHED CRITICAL MASS
    INSOFAR AS THE MOHAMMEDAN THREAT GOES IT IS TIME TO DO ONTO INBREDS AS THEY DO ONTO US.

  2. Lee Hicks says

    December 5, 2016 at 10:23 am

    For those who still remain ignorant of the true requirements that Allah has for his followers, this is classic Islam.

    The “no compulsion in religion” quote (and those like it) that are touted as showing the peaceful nature of Islam, come from Mohammad’s early years in Mecca.

    When he moved to Medina, these verses were replaced with ones requiring Jihad, as Mohammad became a ruthless and bloodthirsty warlord.

    Islam IS Jihad, and any supposed Muslims who reject this reality (as well as rejecting murder, pedophilia, hatred of women and children, hatred of Christians and Jews, and the blind following of the corruption and evil passed on through Mohammad) will be themselves cast away by Allah, the evil god that they believe they serve.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

One-upmanship and irrational behaviour in the Koran # 1, Adam tells the angels their names

[2.31] And He taught Adam all the names, then presented them to the angels; then He said: Tell me the names of those if you are right.
[2.32] They said: Glory be to Thee! we have no knowledge but that which Thou hast taught us; surely Thou art the Knowing, the Wise.
[2.33] He said: O Adam! inform them of their names. Then when he had informed them of their names, He said: Did I not say to you that I surely know what is ghaib in the heavens and the earth and (that) I know what you manifest and what you hide?

In the bible Adam gives the animals names in the first creation week. In the Koran Adam tells the angels their names. What is the purpose of this event? In what way are the angels hiding their names? The story makes no sense. To the mind of a pagan simpleton it might look impressive on the surface but it is completely non-sensical. A religion that describes its supreme deity as behaving in a weird manner as described in this passage cannot be taken seriously by any rational creature.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Germany: Muslim migrant rapes and murders daughter of top EU official

December 4, 2016 12:17 pm By 34 Comments

The political elites and their families are not exempt from the catastrophe they have brought upon Europe. Maria Ladenburger was a casualty of policies that her father almost certainly supported and probably still supports. Her death ought to be the occasion for some serious soul-searching among those elites, and a thorough reevaluation of the policies that have allowed the entry into Europe of untold numbers of young Muslim men who think that non-Muslim women exist for their sexual use. But it probably will not be.

maria-ladenburger

“Daughter of top EU official raped and murdered in Germany – Afghan migrant admits killing,” by Rob Virtue, Allan Hall and Monika Pallenberg, Express, December 4, 2016:

AN Afghan migrant has admitted the rape and murder of a medical student, who also worked voluntarily at a refugee centre.

Maria Ladenburger, the daughter of a high-ranking EU official, was returning from a party in the university city of Freiburg in Germany when she was assaulted on a cycle path.

She was raped and then drowned before her body was found in the River Dreisam.

The shocking incident happened on October 16 but details have only been released after an arrest on Friday.

The suspect, an Afghan migrant, was caught after police found DNA on a scarf near the path.

The scarf reportedly belonged to Maria.

They also found a strand of hair on a nearby blackberry bush.

Officers then trawled CCTV to see find people with a similar hairstyle, which led them to the suspect.

Following his arrest the suspect, aged 17, pleaded guilty to the attack and will be sentenced next year.

The unnamed migrant arrived in Germany last year as an unaccompanied minor and lived with a local family in the city.

Ms Ladenburger reportedly worked in her spare time helping out in refugee homes in Freiburg.

But it is unclear whether she ever met her murderer before he took her life.

The dead girl’s father is Dr. Clemens Ladenburger, a lawyer who works as the right hand man to the legal director of the European Commission….

UK bans three bishops from Iraq and Syria from entering the country
CNN’s Van Jones: Muslims turn to jihad “when people say stuff like Trump. Trump kind of helps make people radical”
Quantcast

Comments

  1. le mouron rouge says

    December 4, 2016 at 12:23 pm

    Tragic, anoither young life lost.

    First they came for the Communists,
    and I didn’t speak up,
    because I wasn’t a Communist.
    Then they came for the Jews,
    and I didn’t speak up,
    because I wasn’t a Jew.
    Then they came for the Catholics,
    and I didn’t speak up,
    because I was a Protestant.
    Then they came for me,
    and by that time there was no one
    left to speak up for me.
    – Martin Niemoller

  2. eur says

    December 4, 2016 at 12:38 pm

    All the life ahead … here in Spain the Moroccans / Magrebies rape girls but it is not habitual the murder after a rape. The numbers of rapes are scandalous. Poor girl, I’m so sorry, she thought that all cultures are the same and has taken with reality this way. Rest in peace and a hug to the family … (the father will now rather be spinning his head)

  3. Ron Mitchinson says

    December 4, 2016 at 12:38 pm

    You reap what you sow. Hopefully this gives some pause to those elites that are destroying the country. By the sounds of it she wasn’t to bright and had swallowed the koolaid her father and the rest were pushing to the masses.

  4. Halperin says

    December 4, 2016 at 12:55 pm

    Sadly enough this cruel killing is most likely not going to change the policy regarding the influx of illegal immigrants from Africa and Asia (near east and Afghanistan).
    Our cities in Germany are being flooded with this people. Since then I read at least once a week of women being molested or raped by african or middle eastern looking men. People being robbed by, and drugs are being sold by this men as well.
    The politicians do nothing and the police seems to be helpless.
    I’m just disgusted.

  5. davej says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:03 pm

    “The refugees are not dangerous”.

    Not grateful either, apparently, with predictably more mayhem to come. Congratulations Germany.

    • gravenimage says

      December 4, 2016 at 4:00 pm

      These “refugees” *are* dangerous, as all of these rapes and murders of native Germans makes quite clear.

  6. Voytek Gagalka says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:04 pm

    Any sane person capable to reason will make proper conclusion and correct wrong course. But, on another hand, one must understand the power of denial and blanking out. I could see already this official searching in desperation for all possible rationalizations to avoid reaching unavoidable conclusion. He would rather commit suicide now than admit his error and become an ardent follower of Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.

  7. Doug says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:05 pm

    This was so sad and unnecessary.

    The only way it might possibly change the elite snobs in high towers is if a lot of them knew and loved the young women.

    The government and wealthy elite are destroying our western cultures by flooding in migrants from areas that do not believe like we do.

  8. Marty says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:11 pm

    “The shocking incident happened on October 16…”

    Why media persists in labeling incidents like these “shocking” is ridiculous.

    Absolutely no one in the entire world would find this news shocking at this point save someone that had been marooned on a Caribbean island for the last 15 years and just now returned.

  9. TheOldOligarch says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:11 pm

    This story really does prove the adage ”never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity”. It really does reveal that the elites are so stupid that they actually do believe their own bullshit. I would have expected a man like this girl’s father to tow the line publicly about how Muslim migrants are all benign and not dangerous at all but then studiously avoid having his daughter go anywhere near them. If she was volunteering at a refugee center I cannot imagine that he did not know. I guess he learned his lesson now though, or perhaps not.

  10. Dan says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:22 pm

    I’d like to make a comment, about the comments here.

    As much as we can’t stand the leftie twit thinking about the scum most of these fake refugees are, now isn’t the time to say anything about this young woman’s family and friends except to offer condolences and maybe, I for one at least, hope that this murdering savage is force fed a last meal of pork and given a lard shroud before execution.

    Shred Merckel, and Trudope, and Odumba, and the libby left, curse them to Hell to even but, for now leave the woman’s family to grieve peace without a bunch of “I told you so.”s

    • Jack Diamond says

      December 4, 2016 at 2:00 pm

      Of course her family is in shock and no one should want to add to their pain.

      But the father is part of the EU machinery bringing about this Muslim invasion of Europe and Germany. He is a lawyer for the EU, and people are commenting in the context of the callous disregard for the other girls and women victims of these invaders, who were not their daughters, exhibited by such officials over and over. And the resolute denial of the real problem continues (“Dieter Salomon, the mayor of Freiburg warned people not to “apply perpetrator background for sweeping judgements, but to view it as an isolated incident”). So these atrocities will continue for other people’s daughters.

      • le mouron rouge says

        December 4, 2016 at 2:26 pm

        Jack Diamond,

        Excellent comment.

        And unfortunately, as you so saliently state, “So these atrocities will continue for other people’s daughters.”

        Let us “not.” in the emotion of the moment, forget the thousand’s of women across Europe and around the world who have and who are suffering at the hands of these cretins and the evil of Islam.

    • TheOldOligarch says

      December 4, 2016 at 2:16 pm

      I disagree, the stakes are too high for pussy footing around here. They need to have this shoved down their throats at every opportunity, with no allowances made for personal tragedies. Honestly, if I met the girl’s father in real life I’d tell him to his face that this is his fault.

      • Mac-101 says

        December 4, 2016 at 3:21 pm

        Gotta agree with you. However in the EU you’d probably go to jail for it as hate speech! More people gotta stand UP or we ALL will be slaughtered

  11. Oliver says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:42 pm

    Sorry, I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO SYMPATHY FOR THIS FAMILY, ESPECIALLY THE FATHER.

    The young woman was living in Germany–LAST JAN-10 MONTHS –I REPEAT-10 MONTHS- there were numerous rapes in Germany –did she not read newspapers? Go on the Internet?

    Watch television? Is germany SO CENSORED THAT THERE WAS/IS NO NEWS ABOUT CRIMES-EVEN IF DOWNPLAYED? Worked at a refugee center; helped refugee families.

    And her father an attorney for the EU- helping ( my guess) bring more into Europe.

    As it is written- reap what you sow.

    My sympathies would be for those and the families of those who are powerless –to do anything, not for those and the families who promote these pieces of trash.

    • Mac-101 says

      December 4, 2016 at 3:23 pm

      Worse, the EU Elites will most likely have MORE security assigned to them and their families hurting the tax payin workin people even more!

  12. hrj says

    December 4, 2016 at 1:49 pm

    This should not be the way of end if such a gracful life, very sorrowfull,Way a parasitic culture of those who stabbing helping humane hand instead of being gratfull to accommodating culture,very sorrowful.

  13. Undaunted says

    December 4, 2016 at 2:07 pm

    I don’t feel sorry at all for the so-called victims in this case, and in the countless similar instances. The truth is the truth and can be searched for, found, discerned, believed and acted upon. The truth is that Islam is evil. Despite the overwhelming proof ~ and there is a difference between evidence and proof ~ these people, including Maria Ladenburger, decided to shun truth in favor of feeling good about themselves. Because of their crass selfishness and arrogance, they decided to follow a lie, though they could have at any time chosen to look for and embrace the truth and then made choices that would have increased their odds of survival in this war.

    The truth will set you free, indeed. In this case, the truth would have freed Maria from the “compassion” that drove her to put herself unwisely and needlessly in a brood of vipers. I hope her father can understand how much responsibility he bears for raising his daughter to be so stupid and gullible. Maybe he can man-up and use Maria’s rape and murder and his culpability in it as motivation to finally stand up for truth and become a voice of reason and courage as this battle continues.

  14. Jas says

    December 4, 2016 at 2:23 pm

    It is a tragedy that is unfolding dozens of times over, and over again…and, they needed this wake up call; drastic measures are required. Islam allows this type of violence committed on the unbeliever’s women, despite proponents of the faith’s denials…So; let the elite ‘authorities’ be warned; their wives and daughters are now at risk…and, to be nonchalant about the problem is to sacrifice the sacred for personal gain…

  15. Undaunted says

    December 4, 2016 at 2:36 pm

    General George Patton said in Boston on 7 June ’45 for: “It is a popular idea that a man is a hero just because he was killed in action. Rather, I think, a man is frequently a fool when he gets killed.

    People like Maria are not warriors on the side of right but are fools who have willingly chosen to aid and abet our enemy. Thus, people like Maria deserve to be called what they are: traitors to the truth and to those billions who live according to truth. None of them deserve sympathy or empathy, but have instead earned for themselves shame and disdain.

    The enemy is not just a person about to rape and then murder you. The enemy can be and is a belief called Islam.

  16. Angemon says

    December 4, 2016 at 2:51 pm

    Her death ought to be the occasion for some serious soul-searching among those elites, and a thorough reevaluation of the policies that have allowed the entry into Europe of untold numbers of young Muslim men who think that non-Muslim women exist for their sexual use.

    Indeed. But why go through the trouble of using facts and engaging in self-criticism when one can simply say that German society is so “racist” and “islamophobic” that “migrants” are so discriminated against that they end up “self-radicalizing” and turn to crime?

  17. gravenimage says

    December 4, 2016 at 3:45 pm

    Germany: Muslim migrant rapes and murders daughter of top EU official
    …………………….

    This *poor girl*. And note–she was volunteering in a migrant center when she was raped and murdered. Muslims turn on those helping them.

    A terrible thing–I hope it leads Dr. Ladenburger to act to prevent such horrors happening to others like his daughter Maria.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Ruben Israel confronts Muslims

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment