The much vaunted protected Dhimmi status of Islam is a con trick because Sharia will never accuse a Muslim of a crime on behalf of the Infidel. Islam would be committing blasphemy against itself if it were to do so. In addition to this Allah is always pleased when infidels are harmed

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Does Jesus command us to hate by witholding any act of love to which we are indebted to our neighbour under the biblical laws? No, he is only referring to the forbearing of voluntary acts of love to our neighbour and to ourselves, for the sake of a higher good, which would not violate our duty to either our neighbour or to God under the law

King James Bible

If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

For example a man has the choice to take his wife and kids out to the park or visit his parents or stay at home and go to his room and pray and read the bible, just for arguments sake. He can’t do all three at once. He has to make a choice. The sun is shining and his parents would be glad to see him and his family.

If he stays at home and goes to his room and prays and studies the bible this is an example of what Jesus means by this saying.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Hate Behind Muslim Tears and Outrage

A look at the other, more endemic tragedy surrounding the rape and murder of an 8-year-old Pakistani girl.

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

A sense of supremacism permeates everything in the Muslim supremacist’s life—even those things that Western media portray as humanitarian, understandable, or laudable.

Consider the rape and strangulation of Zainab Ansari, an eight-year-old Muslim girl whose mangled body was found in a dump last January in Pakistan.  The tragic incident sparked mass outrage in the Muslim nation.   Famous celebrities and tens of thousands of other Pakistanis “expressed their shock on social media using the hashtag ‘justiceforZainab’”; angry mobs attacked police and government buildings—leaving at least two dead and many wounded; Islamic clerics warned governmental officials either to produce the murderer instantly, step down—or else.  “Can we please catch this animal and punish him publicly?” is the question that “summed up many people’s exasperation at a lack of progress in finding the killer.”

Needless to say, the outrage sensed by Pakistanis concerning this hapless girl’s lot, and their desire to see justice meted out to her rapist-murderer, is appreciable.  The problem, however, is that this outrage is entirely predicated on the fact that she was Muslim.  Many young Christian girls have been and continue to be raped, mutilated, and murdered—only for Pakistanis to respond with deafening silence.

The following is a brief (and far from complete) list of these unlamented Christian girls:

  • Nisha, 9, was abducted by Muslims, gang-raped, murdered by repeated blows to her head, and then dumped in a canal.
  • Lubna, 12, was kidnapped, gang-raped, and murdered by a group of Muslims.
  • Muqadas, 12, was ambushed in a field near her home; the postmortem revealed that she had been “gang raped and then strangled to death by five men.”
  • Shazia, 12, was enslaved, raped, and murdered by Chaudhry Naeem, a rich Muslim lawyer, who was acquitted in court.

“It is shameful,” explained local Pakistani sources while discussing the brutal rape of a separate 9-year-old Christian girl. “Such incidents occur frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be damaged at leisure.  Abusing them is a right. According to the [Muslim] community’s mentality it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war (emphasis added).”

Nor, it should be mentioned, are Christian boys spared.  While in a Christian district in Pakistan, a group of Muslim men abducted a 7-year-old boy, took turns gang raping him before strangling and dumping his body in a field—just like Zainab.  The body of another Christian boy, Samuel Yaqoob, aged 11, was also “found near a drain … bearing marks of horrific torture, with the murder weapon nearby. His nose, lips and belly had been sliced off, and his family could hardly recognize him because the body was so badly burnt.”  Autopsy found “23 wounds by a sharp weapon” and indications “of sodomy.”

Explaining such incidents, Wilson Chowdhry, Chairman of the British Pakistani Christian Association, said, “Parts of Pakistani culture have a strong homosexual pederast culture, and Christian and other minority boys are especially susceptible to rape and abuse because of the powerlessness of their community and their despised status (emphasis added).”

And that’s the point. As “infidels,” Christians in Pakistan are widely seen as “untouchables,” fit only for picking the “excrement of Muslims,” and are thus regularly “treated like animals.” Outside the victims’ family and surrounding Christian community, virtually no one else in the 99% Muslim-majority nation cares when Christians and their children are savaged and murdered, the way Muslim Zainab was.  None of the aforementioned rape-murders of Christian children led to a nationwide scandal; none were followed by mass tweets and hashtags, outraged celebrities, mass uprisings, fatal riots, or threats to officials and police.  Nor did they earn their own Wikipedia page the way Zainab did.

Unsurprisingly, whereas the murderer of Zainab was caught days after the incident, the murderers of the aforementioned Christian children were never “found.”

It is precisely due to this indifference that rapists and murderers tend to target Christian children: if society doesn’t care, police won’t bother, and they can get away with it—if not be heroized for doing a service to Islam.  After explaining that “the forced conversion to Islam of women from religious minority groups through rape and abduction has reached an alarming stage” in Pakistan, the Asian Human Rights Commission elaborated in a 2011 report:

The situation is worse with the police who always side with the Islamic groups and treat minority groups as lowly life forms. The dark side of the forced conversion to Islam … also involves the criminal elements who are engaged in rape and abduction and then justify their heinous crimes by forcing the victims to convert to Islam. The Muslim fundamentalists are happy to offer these criminals shelter and use the excuse that they are providing a great service to their sacred cause of increasing the population of Muslims.

Not only do police in Pakistan do virtually nothing to combat this “jihad”; sometimes they are themselves the culprits.  In yet another instance, a “Christian boy was kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed by a police officer, his body similarly being dumped in a drain.”

More often, however, police and other local officials and imams merely side with the perpetrators, whenever the Christian victims’ families make too much noise demanding “justice”—that is, when they get too uppity for “dhimmis,” who according to Islamic law are required to “know their place” and be thankful that, as undesirable and vulnerable infidels, they are allotted any measure of tolerance at all.  For example, another 12-year-old Christian girl known as “Anna” was gang raped for eight months, forcibly converted, “married” to her Muslim attacker, but then escaped.  Instead of seeing justice done, she and her Christian family were last reported as “in hiding from the rapists and the police.”

Muslim bias concerning who matters (fellow Muslims) and who doesn’t (everyone else) is regularly missed in the West.  For example, the Muslim obligation to pay zakat (often translated as “charity”) is always hailed in the West as a reflection of Islam’s “humanitarian” side—even though mainstream Islamic law insists that such “charity” go only to help Muslims, never the hated infidel.

Even when Muslims go on terrorist sprees in America—such as the NY subway bomber or the Ohio State stabber—media fall over themselves to suggest that it was outrage at the plight of suffering Muslims (always the Rohinyas in Myanmar) that prompted these men to go over the edge in their quest for “justice” (never mind that their American victims have nothing to do with Myanmar policy).

A more fitting explanation is that they merely hate infidels, as seen in the fact that Somalia, where Abdul Raza, the Ohio state stabber was born and raised, is considered the third worst Muslim nation in the world to be Christian (which is certainly saying something since some 40 of the absolute worst 50 nations are Muslim).  Although Christians can be essentially beheaded on sight in Somalia, such an “injustice” against his own fellow countrymen never seemed to bother the supposedly “humanitarian” Abdul.

Islam is responsible for this bias: the Koran calls on Muslims to be “forceful against the infidels, merciful among themselves [48:29]”; Islamic doctrine holds that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims — who are further likened to dogs and cattle.  Hence, if they care little when subhuman infidels are raped and murdered, they get angry seeing infidel minorities agitating for equality with Muslims—and they get downright murderous seeing infidels actually lording over Muslims.

From here, one begins to understand the ultimate Muslim grievance: Israel. If powerless and downtrodden Christian minorities in the Muslim world are still treated atrociously, how must Muslims feel about Jews—the descendants of pigs and apes, according to the Koran—exercising power and authority over fellow Muslims?  Unmitigated outrage.

Of course, if grievances against Israel were really about universal justice and displaced Palestinians, Muslims would be aggrieved at the fact that millions of Christians are currently being displaced in the name of jihad and generally treated in ways that make being Palestinian seem enviable.

But they are not aggrieved, and will not be anytime soon, for Muslim grievances are based on what hurts Muslims, never what hurts infidels—quite the opposite.



Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Hijab Shame: Rape, Murder and Loss of Face

World Hijab Day, Macy’s and betrayal.

February 1st was the fifth World Hijab Day. Hijab is the Muslim headscarf that the media continually mischaracterize as merely a symbol of modesty in Islam. World Hijab Day was founded by New York activist Nazma Khanin in 2013 and is now celebrated in 140 countries. The stated goal is to foster religious tolerance and understanding by encouraging women of all religions to wear and experience hijab for one day. Put on a pretty head scarf and you too can enter a popular victim class. If you are really lucky you may be harassed and enjoy the full discrimination experience. Ironically, many of the same feminists who wore pussy hats at the Women’s March put on head scarves to stand in solidarity with their Muslim sisters. One month these feminist fashionistas are dressing up like giant vaginas and the next month celebrating their modesty. It would be much less confusing if these women would stop using headwear to symbolize their political positions. It makes you worry what else is in their clothes closet.

A few days later Macy’s announced a new clothing line for Muslim women making them the first major department store in the U.S. to sell hijabs. This is part of a new trend called Haute Hijab to glamorize and normalize the covering of women. In an interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, Sonia Ossorio, President of the New York City chapter of the National Organization for Women, said that hijab was a symbol of empowerment and resistance against Donald Trump. Her statement was in reference to women who never wore hijab before who decided to wear it in protest of the travel ban. While deluded Western feminists are embracing the most recognizable symbol of institutional oppression, women in Iran are risking their lives waving and burning their head coverings in protest against the state-mandated law.

Sonia Ossorio and other so-called feminists interpret the wearing of hijab from their own cultural perspective as if all women wear it of their own free will. They do not understand that one of the fundamental reasons that women must be covered is that modesty is intrinsically intertwined with Islamic concepts of purity, honor and shame. These feminist fashionistas do not realize that no matter how pretty the hijab head scarf, it is essentially a prison uniform. It is used as a shaming mechanism to make women think their own bodies are the cause of male sexual urges, that they are a dirty impure unclean gender who must be hidden, cloistered, secluded and segregated so they do not entice or contaminate the community of men.

Sharia Islamic law requires the strict observance of purification rites that include everything from dietary laws, dress codes, sexual and other prohibitions. Most significantly, rites of purity function as ritualization, a form of repetitive symbolic conditioning. Ritualization is accomplished by designating natural bodily functions as intrinsically impure. The result of this process is that the human body is experienced as a source of shame, full of impurities that must be covered, concealed, and continuously purified. Due to menstruation women are inherently impure, hence polluted. If they are not covered and secluded their menstrual blood may contaminate the purity of the entire community. Once you convince an entire gender that they should be ashamed of their own bodily functions they can never become full members of society.

Not only are women considered unclean, they are viewed as explicitly sexual beings in which every part of their body is thought to be erotic. A woman’s entire body is viewed as private parts that must be covered. If you shake a woman’s hand it is the equivalent of touching her crotch. If a woman’s hair is displayed, it is the equivalent of exposing her pubic hair. Uncovered women are viewed as prostitutes and adulterers and the prevailing attitude is that if an uncovered woman is raped she asked for it. In September 2006 in a Ramadan sermon on adultery, Australia’s most senior Muslim cleric blamed immodestly dressed women who don’t wear hijab for being preyed on by men. Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali alluded to the infamous Sydney gang rapes in 2000, committed by a group of fourteen Lebanese Australian men, and suggested the attackers were not entirely to blame. Sheik Hilali said: “If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it … whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem.”

The function of hijab is not simply protecting modesty, it also protects purity and family honor. Hijab needs to be understood in the context of honor shame cultures in which any violation brings dishonor to the family. Uncovered women signify immodesty or unfaithfulness which forfeits a woman’s honor and shames the men in the family. Breaking tradition has serious consequences and family members are obligated to restore honor and cleanse the family of the shame. Consequently, not wearing hijab has resulted in “honor violence.” Both Muslim and Western women have been the victims of beatings, rape, torture, disfigurement and death for not wearing hijab in Western and Middle East Countries. This violence is considered a justifiable method to punish and restore honor to the family who could not control their women.

In October 2017, a 35-year-old man was charged with assault, assault with a weapon, and uttering death threats in Gatineau city, Quebec for beating his teenage daughter for over a year for refusing to wear hijab. In November 2016 in Vienna, Austria, a 17-year-old girl was savagely beaten at a shopping center by a group of teenage girls and a boy who were part of a Sharia patrol. They shouted, “She has pulled the headscarf down, demolish her!” and then beat her until her jaw was broken in two places. On December 10, 2007, 16-year-old Aqsa Parvez was strangled to death by her brother in their Mississauga, Ontario, Canada home after she refused to wear the hijab. Her father and brother were sentenced to life in prison.

Women who do not wear hijab are perceived as responsible for their own beatings, rapes and deaths. One of the most disturbing examples of a gang rape occurred on February 11, 2011 detailed in my article The Semiotics of Honor Killing & Ritual Murder. When Egyptians were celebrating the resignation of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak the blonde haired blue-eyed TV journalist Lara Logan who was reporting for CBS News was not wearing a headscarf. Being uncovered it was obvious that she was not an Egyptian Muslim woman, hence she was an open target. Logan was beaten, and gang raped by a crowd of three hundred men. YouTube and some Arab websites reported that at least six men raped her vaginally, and several men raped her anally. She was also masturbated and urinated on. There were reports that her left breast was bitten and that the entire left nipple was bitten off. In her one and only interview discussing the attack on 60 minutes Logan did not provide details of the sexual aspect of the assault but described how her clothes were ripped off, she was beaten with flagpoles and sticks, how the men tried to tear off chunks of her scalp and literally tried to tear the limbs from her body. From a Western perspective this was a crazed mob out of control. For a shame culture this was an acceptable punishment for a woman who was not properly covered. They pulled her blonde hair out and more than likely kept it as souvenirs.

Women who don’t wear hijab are not only raped, beaten, tortured and murdered many are deliberately disfigured.  Disfigurement and mutilation is even more common than rape as punishment for not wearing hijab. In Pakistan, Kashmir, and Afghanistan, hundreds of women have been blinded or maimed when acid was thrown on their unveiled faces by men who considered them improperly dressed.  Schoolgirls have also been the victims of acid attacks simply for attending school. If the women and girls survive the attacks they are permanently disfigured and often blinded from the hydrochloric or sulfuric acid. Throwing acid on the face, the only body part permitted to be viewed in public, is intended to socially stigmatize the women and send a message that they are of disrepute, bad character and outcasts who engaged in taboo conduct. Stigma and dishonor are both the intent and result of rape and acid attacks. It is a literal loss of face. Symbolically, mutilation is the archetypal sign of dishonor. From a strategic perspective a mutilated victim is forever stigmatized, a living personification of shame, a visible sign of dishonor and a political advertisement for Sharia law.

Muslim women who choose to wear hijab have internalized their own oppression. Western non-Muslim women who wear hijab have been indoctrinated into social justice myths of Islamophobia. World Hijab Day, founded by a Muslim activist/operative, is part of the stealth jihad strategy to slowly introduce Sharia law into Western culture. The president of the New York Chapter of the National Organization for Women thinks women should wear hijab as part of the resistance against President Trump. Macy’s, an American institution, is marketing garments of slavery and glamorizing the subjugation of women. Shame on everyone.


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Child Rape is an offence in the West and in the Bible. It is not an offence in Islam if the child is a non-Muslim

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

(1) Narrated Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-‘As: The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: Command your children to pray when they become seven years old, and beat them for it (prayer) when they become ten years old; and arrange their beds (to sleep) separately. (Book #2, Hadith #0495)

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Malaysia: Muslim beats his 9-year-old daughter to death for making mistakes while reciting Qur’an. A post from, with comments

A culture of violence, the foundational text of which commands men to beat women from whom they “fear disobedience” (Qur’an 4:34), is going to give rise to this sort of thing, just as that same foundational text’s calls for violence against unbelievers (2:191, 4:89, 9:5, 9:29, 47:4, etc.) are going to give rise to jihad violence.

An update on this story. “Soldier charged with murder of nine-year-old daughter,” Malaysiakini, February 12, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

A soldier was charged in the Port Dickson Magistrate’s Court today with the murder of his nine-year-old daughter last month.

According to Bernama, Mohammad Abdullah Mohamed, 35, nodded after the charge was read out before magistrate Siti Khariah Abdul Razak, but no plea was recorded.

Mohammad Abdullah is accused of murdering Nur Aina Nabihah at Taman Vista Jaya in Lukut, Port Dickson, between 8.30pm and 11.30pm on Jan 31 this year….

According to reports, police detained the suspect and the child’s 34-year-old stepmother on Feb 1, after the girl died in the Seremban Hospital after being found unconscious at home. The woman has since been released on bond.

The child had various injuries on her body, including a punctured intestine, damaged liver and broken ribs.

Some reports stated that Nur Aina was subjected to a commando-like routine by the suspect, who is her biological father.

This included doing push-ups, sit-ups, rollovers and squats. She was also reportedly beaten, among others, with a plastic chair and belt, slapped, kicked and even stomped on.

The child was made to undergo these “punishments” because Nur Aina did not recite prayers before bedtime, made mistakes while reciting the Quran, or did not obey the man’s instructions, reports said.


        • CRUSADER says

          According to Irshad Manji,

          Allah is about Love….


          Omar Sultan Haque reviews Irshad Manji’s book “Allah, Liberty and Love” …

          One answer—in the affirmative—comes from the journalist Irshad Manji in her brave new book. It is an intimate and optimistic apologia for a future with more liberal and open interpretations of Islam. In the end, the book fails to grapple with some of the more substantial questions that would make this future …

          “Manji’s God resembles an extremely affectionate and powerful high school guidance counselor…”


          Irshad Manji on Allah, Liberty and Love – YouTube

          Irshad Manji, director of the Moral Courage Project at New York University, talks to Timothy Garton Ash about …

            • LeftisruiningCanada says

              Manji basically doesn’t want anything that islam offers.

              Especially the bit where homosexuals get thrown from rooftops.

              Wonder why she persists trying to reinvent islam? it’s already ‘perfect’ isn’t it?

                • CRUSADER says

                  Irshad Manji gets a career out of being this way, as long as she also keeps secure.

        • CRUSADER says

          Along with other festivals such as:

          Lame a Leprechaun

          Mame a Menehune

          Dunk a Dwarf

          Jack a Jalopy

          Gyp a Giant

          and of course

          Flip a Faery.

    1. elee says

      Every Muslim child is a victim.

      Some may be familiar with research on the dynamic of victims-becoming-perpetrators in child sex crime. Islam is equally pathological and more violent, has its well-entrenched pedophile traditions, and seems to work very much like sexual victimisation of children. Anybody know of any research in this area? The area is ripe for research, just don’t look for any big grants for the work…….

        • Shmoovie says

          Wonder how many “punishments” this nearly useless girl child had, that weren’t discovered or were left unreported.
          She was getting to be of a marriageable age. Heaven forbid she be given to a family friend and humiliate her father with mistaken recitations.

    1. mortimer says

      Under Sharia law, a father or grandfather is not guilty of crime when killing his own offspring.

      Sharia law manual ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ permits honor killing: “retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2).

      The Islamic parent is an DESPOT who can do anything to a child up to and including murdering the child as long as it is for RELIGIOUS REASONS.

      I am sure this murderer will try to use Sharia law to reduce his charge and sentence.

        • mortimer says

          FYI, the theological premise of the Koran is that Allah chose the Koraish tribe to conquer the world, to enrich themselves and to impose discriminatory Sharia law.

          Allah does not speak to humans directly, but used a Spirit Guide (as is the case at a séance) to commicate to Mohammed. Mohammed was the last spirit-medium that was permitted and now everyone must read Mohammed puzzling weird book and follow Sharia law to obey Allah.

          Allah will reward Muslims if they enter the washroom on one foot and leave it with the other and if they never get urine on their clothing…. there are 1,000 other absurdities as well.

            • CogitoErgoSum says

              Whether Muhammad was criminally insane or demonically possessed ….. his spirit was pure evil which continues to pour out much worse than urine upon the world.

        • Jay Boo says

          I must disagree.
          This is not about a person who happened to be a crazed animal.

          As mortimer pointed out above, this is allowed under Sharia law.

          Islam is a sanctuary for this kind of person.

            • Thomas Kimball says

              You don’t have to be a crazed animal to live by sharia law,but it sure the FU*K helps!!!

    1. MFritz says

      At least he still got arrested and charged for murder. God knows what excuse they would have accepted in Saudi Arabia or Iran.

    1. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Look at the bright side: at least he wasn’t having sex with her. Or, maybe he was, but she cut him off and he flipped out an murdered her and then made up a cover story about the Holy Ko-Ran thing.

    1. Cheer Bear Girl says

      Too bad she lives in a Muslim Sh!****. If she lived in the West the father would be charged with murder. Oh nevermind that would be Islamophobic.

        • t says

          All I can say is that it’s on-a-massive-scale evil, evil cult!

          What is worse is it’s equivalent evil cult, albeit in an angelic form, very wide spread in the west these days, that is covering for, promoting, helping and enabling in all manners and by all means Islam to finish its conquest of the west itself.

          I am not talking about us, who live in the west and know Islam, inside and out, and are disgusted by it, but our fellow citizens who have the reigns of power and the majority of people who stubbornly want to stay ignorant about Islam, till the end.

    1. Edgar Allan says

      The Messenger of Allah said: Command your children to pray when they become seven years old, and beat them for it (prayer) when they become ten years old; and arrange their beds (to sleep) separately.

    1. Vlad the Impaler III says

      Malaysia? I didn’t think non-Middle Eastern muslims are as crazy as their Middle Eastern muslim bretheren.

            • StellaSaidSo says

              It is the same creed, but historically it has not been interpreted in the same way by all Muslims. For example, until the Saudi money started pouring in to Indonesia, most Indonesian Muslims were liberal in their interpretation of the scriptures, and many could best be described as ‘cultural’ Muslims, observing their religious traditions only on ceremonial occasions. No-one would ever have accused such gentle, hospitable people of ‘savagery’. Now, liberal Muslims in Indonesia live in fear, as the FPI and other agents of Wahhabism gain political influence and gradually force sharia compliance on local communities.

        • StellaSaidSo says

          Saudi money has ‘Wahhabised’ Islam in Malaysia. We see the same trend towards fundamentalism throughout SE Asia as 40 years of Saudi ‘investment’ pays off.

    1. gravenimage says

      Malaysia: Muslim beats his 9-year-old daughter to death for making mistakes while reciting Qur’an

      This *poor little child*.

      I have no words for how much I hate Islam.

    1. JCLincoln says

      islam needs to be totally eradicated off the faceof the Earth.

      islam is the religion of Satan,
      Mohamed is his False Prophet,
      Obama is his anti-Christ

  1. JCLincoln says

    islam needs to be eradicated off the face of the Earth

    islam is the religion of Satan,
    Mohamed is his False Prophet,
    Obama is his anti-Christ

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Belgium: Muslim migrant almost kicks to death 87-year-old man for criticizing Islam

Feb 13, 2018 3:07 pm By Robert Spencer

Vigilante enforcement of Sharia blasphemy laws in Ghent. Is Belgium diverse enough yet?

“87-year-old Belgian man almost kicked to death for criticising Islam,” Voice of Europe, February 13, 2018:
A man with a ‘migrant background’, attacked the 87-year-old Hendrik Keuleers and left him for dead last year. Since the elderly man started criticising Islam he is no longer safe in his own house.
Keuleers, who lives in the Belgian city of Ghent, is known for his window posters that criticise bull fights, Spain’s prime minister and Islam.
It wasn’t the first incident for the old man. Belgian media say his house has been terrorised for years after he started criticising Islam with self-made window posters.
His flower pots were destroyed, his windows were smashed, and last year it resulted in the latest attack, during which he was kicked off his bicycle.
Video footage of the incident shows how Keuleers was attacked by a man with a migrant background. He spat at the old man and kicked him off his bicycle. Keuleers was unconscious and left for dead.
After the violent incident it did not stop and someone even reported Keuleers for encouraging racism and violence. Fortunately for him the case was dropped.
Keuleers reacts: “Yes my posters are controversial and generate discussions. Why isn’t that allowed in the rebellious Ghent? Why am I not allowed what a lot of people are thinking but don’t dare to say?”…


john spielman says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:15 pm
yup this is the face of islam whemn they reach 20 % of the population the intimidation and beatings and killings start until society accepts the fascist ideology of islam
just like the Hitlerites did in Germany beginning with crystal night
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:22 pm
Hitlerism was a political ideology, a burgeoning system for living a particular way of life, and was steeped briefly in its own “religion”….
For sure, a case can be made to suit a similar outlook on Islam.
Muslims need to be aware that change is coming, that the “West” will not stand for changing for them.
Muslims will have to change, and to adapt, or to convert and make amends, accordingly, or just LEAVE.
Save Europe says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:40 pm
Most definitely ‘leave’, preferably!
Ned says
Feb 13, 2018 at 7:10 pm
You can COUNT on this as a guide to jihad!
Notice this was written in 2008 so country numbers mentioned here will be higher.
Jihad by the Numbers
By EDWARD CLINE July 3, 2008
From Cline’s article:
Muslims are well-behaved citizens and cause little apparent trouble for the host society.
At TWO and THREE PERCENT Muslims begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
From FIVE PERCENT on Muslims exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They push for the introduction of halal (“clean” by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves—along with threats for failure to comply (United States, Switzerland, Sweden). At this point, Muslims work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. (England, Netherlands, Philippines).
When Muslims reach 10 PERCENT of the population, they increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris—car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark—Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh).
After reaching 20 PERCENT of a population expect hair-trigger rioting, Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning (Indonesia, Ethiopia).
After 40 PERCENT you find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare (Bosnia, Chad).
From 60 PERCENT you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels (Sudan, Albania).
After 80 PERCENT, expect to find state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide (Syria, Egypt, UAE).
Eric jones says
Feb 13, 2018 at 9:25 pm
Food for thought. End Muslim immigration into the USA. No refugees, no student visas, no work visas.
Save Europe says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:39 pm
It may well have been even less than 20% of Germans who were Nazis, for them to be able to seize power, worryingly.
mortimer says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:17 pm
Robert Spencer rightly draws attention to VIGILANTISM in Islam. In fact, vigilantism is permitted in Islam against apostates and those WHO MAKE WAR AGAINST ISLAM VERBALLY.
The Sharia manual of the Shafi school states: “We have already discussed killing the person who, with intent, curses the Prophet, belittles him or slights him in any way. The judgement in this case is clear.” (i.e. the sentence is execution)- from Sharia law manual, “Qadhi Iyaadh in ash-Shifa”, Volume No.2, Page No. 27
Even worse, there is NO FORGIVENESS for a kafir who ‘says something impermissible about Islam’. He must be killed because Mohammed is the only one who can forgive this ‘crime’ and Mohammed is no longer living, so DEATH FOR BLASPHEMERS is obligatory.
Even worse, ANYONE may execute a blasphemer of Islam. Sharia permits the MURDER of anyone who verbally opposes Islam, since they are at war with Islam:
“There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
Anyone who criticizes Islam is called ‘HARBI’.
CogitoErgoSum says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:35 pm
Here is what Wikipedia has concerning the term “harbi.”
The “infidels” who live in dar al-harb (the land or house of war) are not protected “dhimmis” but are “harbis” and Muslims may attack them freely if no treaty exists. Each and every Muslim is under obligation to DECREASE the land of the dar al-harb and to strive to INCREASE the land of the Muslims (or dar al-Islam) by getting rid of all harbi by any means possible …. apparently including outright murder.
Thanks, Mortimer. I did not know that before.
CogitoErgoSum says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:37 pm
Oh no …. I used the wrong link. Here is the right one:
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:23 pm
Thank you for that correction.
I correct, therefore I am. 😉
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:33 pm
Mortimer ~
“There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.”
-Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
Now, does this “no indemnity” bit mean that there is no protection which is obligatory for a Muslim
who kills a Harbi? (Indemnity being: security against or exemption from legal responsibility for one’s actions.)
And, of course, the nature of this matter stipulates that FIRST war has to be in the offing, correct?
(That can easily be rationalized, but it still has to be justifiably stated and used as an excuse.)
[I’m picking up my first copy of RotT, this week….so, that’ll be good to finally peruse this literature.]
CogitoErgoSum says
Feb 13, 2018 at 7:48 pm
Crusader, as I understand it, a harbi is someone who lives in a land that is not under control of the Muslims. This land is known as the dar al-harb. Unless some sort of treaty is in force between the Muslims and the harbi, the harbi are automatically considered to be at war with the Muslims and Muslims are allowed, even obligated, to kill the harbi and claim the harbi land for Islam.
It is just astounding to me that something like this is or ever was a part of what is called a major world religion. We in the West live with a sword hanging by a thread over our heads … and that thread is fraying more each and every day How can any non-Muslim speak in favor of bringing Muslims into their land? It’s simply suicidal to do so.
If I am wrong in some ways about this I hope Mortimer will correct me or someone will give me proof that shows where I am wrong.
gravenimage says
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:45 pm
True, Mortimer and CogitoErgoSum.
Roderick MacUalraig says
Feb 13, 2018 at 7:35 pm
Pisslam is a foul, totalitarian system. The day humanity is free of it can’t get here soon enough.
Save Europe says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:42 pm
Tjhawk says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:20 pm
“Why am I not allowed what a lot of people are thinking but don’t dare to say?”
The whole idea is that if you aren’t allowed to say it, you will eventually stop thinking it.
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:44 pm
Freedom of Speech is for guys like this, so he can offend.
If there isn’t offense, there isn’t much point to the freedom.
Ghent needs to also improve their Neighborhood Watch program!
gravenimage says
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:53 pm
Muslims don’t really care if you think things like this–just so long as you keep quiet about it and are unable to do anything about it.
Bob Carrillo says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:26 pm
I think that these folks completely missed the age of enlightenment..
gravenimage says
Feb 13, 2018 at 5:19 pm
Muslims also missed the High Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and the Industrial age. In fact, they missed pretty much everything except for the dark ages.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Feb 13, 2018 at 5:39 pm
And they do miss those dark days so very much….
Terry Gain says
Feb 13, 2018 at 6:50 pm
It is often said that Islam wants to drag us back to the 7th century, however in terms of enlightenment Islam is pre-Christian.
Save Europe says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:43 pm
….which they will be permanently stuck in.
Raja says
Feb 13, 2018 at 6:31 pm
Bob Carrillo,
For Muslims the very idea of enlightenment is opposite of the West’s idea of enlightenment.
When allah lies and deceives it is enlightenment for Muslims. These lies of allah must be protected by freedom of speech..sarc off. The world is in a perilous state especially the first world thanks to Islam and its importing of the evil culture.
Jaladhi says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:28 pm
It is clear that these criminals should never have been allowed to enter Europe or any non-Muslim country! Now we are seeing the disaster happening in European countries and yet the stupid traitorous politicians do not take any action. They are still allowing Muslims to come to their shores. When will they learn? And why are the natives not rising up – don’t they hear and read these crimes committed by immigrant Muslims.
Terry Gain says
Feb 13, 2018 at 6:55 pm
Yes. The first, most efficient, least expensive and most intelligent line of defense against this enemy is to exclude it from our civilization. We have no obligation to admit the conquerors. In fact it is immoral and cowardly to give Muslims the opportunity to destroy what we have created.
gravenimage says
Feb 13, 2018 at 7:02 pm
Yes–end Muslim immigration into the West now!
Save Europe says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:45 pm
Let’s desist in calling them ‘conquerors’ please. They aren’t. The politicians and Leftards appease and ‘allow’ them. Millions of you and i’s wouldn’t have allowed this!
PRCS says
Feb 13, 2018 at 7:27 pm
“And why are the natives not rising up”
Well, some are.
But they are outnumbered by those who (a) call them “racists” and other negative epithets for doing so, and (b) fear of losing their jobs for doing so and/or being arrested for “inciting hatred”.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:35 pm
It’s one thing to fight the invaders, quite another to fight them and your own country at the same time….
PRCS says
Feb 13, 2018 at 9:41 pm
Very true.
The main problem with democracy (representative democracies included): those who want to undermine/replace a democracy–and their useful idiots–vote, too.
Couple that with lethargic/intimidated opposition voters….
elee says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:38 pm
Is anyone still contending that fear of Muslims is irrational?
Terry Gain says
Feb 13, 2018 at 6:56 pm
Yes. Irrational leftists are still the majority.
Save Europe says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:46 pm
Bob Carrillo says
Feb 13, 2018 at 3:38 pm
..The “Religion of Peace”??? Or, the “Political Ideology” of intolerance, and barbarism, masquerading as a religion?…and hiding behind the blanket of freedom and a civilized society, offered to these people by all these countries…including America.
As is true of the United States (OUR US Constitution and Bill of Rights here), the Europeans have offered a hand of friendship, tolerance, and security, and have received this sort of third world barbarism as payment for their generosity and hospitality.
Some people simply do not play well with others..
WPM says
Feb 13, 2018 at 5:37 pm
Offering a hand is a show of weakness to Islam ,give them a dollar they demand 10 ,let their women walk around tented up they demand all women be tented or raped. Give them a house they demand a second one for the other wife. Deport the parasitically cancer before it kills the host.
Terry Gain says
Feb 13, 2018 at 6:58 pm
Naïveté, ignorance and lack of courage are not virtues.
David Grisez says
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:03 pm
I believe that Islam should be reclassified in the United States from being a protected religious system to being primarily a political governmental system with religious elements that is hostile to the United States. This way mosques could be investigated, and if they are promoting Islamic terrorism and jihad against the United States, these mosques could be shut down.
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:18 pm
Sort of like designating Communism.
WPM says
Feb 13, 2018 at 5:43 pm
It is worst them Communism at least with commies they do not say they are a religion of peace. The Commies are not as good lying ,deceiving, and making rape ,and slaving into a fun game of following the grand master Mohammed sexual fuel suicide race to whore heaven.
Save Europe says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:48 pm
Couldn’t agree more 👍 Islam is the greatest existential threat that the West has ever faced.
Terry Gain says
Feb 13, 2018 at 6:59 pm
Islam is sedition.
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:18 pm
“They” come “here” and won’t play by our rules, but they also want to change the rules to suit them?!!!?
gravenimage says
Feb 13, 2018 at 4:43 pm
Belgium: Muslim migrant almost kicks to death 87-year-old man for criticizing Islam
This *poor man*. Next time will Muslims kill him?
Vigilante enforcement of Sharia blasphemy laws in Ghent. Is Belgium diverse enough yet?
Yes–this is known as “enjoining the right and forbidding the wrong” in Islam–and if the state is not enforcing it, then individual Muslims are supposed to.
A man with a ‘migrant background’, attacked the 87-year-old Hendrik Keuleers and left him for dead last year. Since the elderly man started criticising Islam he is no longer safe in his own house.
Keuleers, who lives in the Belgian city of Ghent, is known for his window posters that criticise bull fights, Spain’s prime minister and Islam.
Somehow I doubt he is under threat from bull fighting afficianados or Mariano Rajoy supporters…
After the violent incident it did not stop and someone even reported Keuleers for encouraging racism and violence. Fortunately for him the case was dropped.
This man is almost beaten to death by ravening Muslims and *he* is accused of encouraging violence? Insanity. Glad the charges were dropped–in many parts of Europe now they would not be.
Keuleers reacts: “Yes my posters are controversial and generate discussions. Why isn’t that allowed in the rebellious Ghent? Why am I not allowed what a lot of people are thinking but don’t dare to say?”…
Because the city is flooded with violent Muslims. Now no one there is safe.
I hope Hendrik Keuleers stays safe–but fear he won’t.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Feb 13, 2018 at 5:44 pm
The situation would be very different if a muslim got attacked for criticizing Christianity at his state funded dawa stand.
DHazard says
Feb 13, 2018 at 5:04 pm
I’m surprised this old man wasn’t already in prison for “hate speech”. If his latest attacker is ever caught I am sure he will tell the court about how the 87 year old’s posters against Islam hurt his feelings really bad and he was just protecting Belgium from fascism. Or maybe he would tell the court “I didn’t like the free house I got and the free money wasn’t enough to pay for bomb making materials. Your Islamophobic government made it almost impossible for me to practice my religion. Allah has commanded me to hate and kill you and you failed to support my religious aspirations. So I had to settle for beating up an old man who’s going to Hell anyway. He’s the one who should be in jail.” In the suicidal EU that would be considered a reasonable defense.
Max Publius says
Feb 13, 2018 at 5:07 pm
This is slow genocide. The effete Juncker EU bureaucrats, like deadly microbes infesting a mighty bear or lion, are to blame. They must be brought up on charges before all is lost.
mike9a says
Feb 13, 2018 at 6:09 pm
What the heck is “a migrant background “, what is next? a man with laziness background, a man with superiority background, a man that exist on earth background…stupid is, as stupid does…ahgrrr never ending saga
Honest Ali says
Feb 13, 2018 at 7:09 pm
That is exactly what Muslims do… use violence to shut down any and all criticism…
They have been doing this since Mohamed directly ordered the murders of his critics.
1400 years of recorded historical evidence… and yet the Liberals still keep insisting that Islam is a religion of peace.
JAT 349 says
Feb 13, 2018 at 8:12 pm

Posted in Uncategorized | 13 Comments

Video from Indonesia: Muslims attack church with machetes, injure priest and several churchgoers, behead statues. Just another Muslim obeying the koranic injunctions and following the example of his prophet Mohammed

 A post from

Pope Francis is doubtless on his way to Yogyakarta now, to explain to these Muslims that, as he has written, “authentic Islam and the proper understanding of the Koran reject every form of violence.” They just misunderstand their own religion, you see. If the great imam Francis can explain it to the poor dears, all will be well.

Note the beheaded statue

“Several churchgoers and priest injured in machete attack on Catholic Church in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” by Adam Harvey,, February 11, 2018:

A priest and several churchgoers have been injured during a machete attack on a church in the Indonesian city of Yogyakarta.

A 22-year-old man armed with a sword or machete attacked members of the congregation at St Lidwina Church.

The priest was struck in the back of the head and several others were injured before the man started hacking at a statue of Jesus and Mary.

A patrolling police officer ran into the church and tried to negotiate with the attacker.

Police said the attacker charged at the officer, who shot and injured him.

    1. Wazza says

      Sadly the cops disn’t shoot to kill, only wounded in the gut, his Muslim buddies will worship, he may get charged, but then again, they can use the obligatory MENTAL health issue, and send him home after a few weeks counseling. Looks like Indonesian Christians may need some security, With shotguns

    1. mikhael says

      i dont condone violence but the Torah demands that we establish courts of justice according to Torah, which condemns idol worship adultery and homhism.
      we cannot endure vigilante justice inside of the israelite community.
      in the book of rev those that uphold the Torah AND the testimony of Yeshua (jesus) will be saved

    1. Gjallarhornet says

      “A patrolling police officer ran into the church and tried to negotiate with the attacker.”

      Seems like a jihadi terrorist gets a lot of slack in that country … A country that is widely held as the most lax and tolerant muslim country. People in the west are to stupid to connect the dots. Whenever there are attacks like this, it is presented in western press as random attacks of violence in countries far way, no contextulalisation or linking between the incidents are ever made.

        • Gjallarhornet says

          Comment: a westerner – in the west – who went into a mosque, just to hurl insult, nothing more, would be charged with hate crime and every charge to be find, and promptly locked up. A muslim attacker of a church in the least fanatical muslim country – is met with … talk. He is not shot before he attacks the police officer directly.

          Question: GIven all this – who do you think will win this strife?

    1. tgusa says

      Seems like an eternity ago that George Bush stood in front of the American people and proclaimed that islam was the religion of peace.

    1. StellaSaidSo says

      This will get worse before it gets better.

      The Saudis have not been pouring billions of dollars into ‘moderate’ Muslim countries in order for them to stay ‘moderate’.

      Australia needs to be alert. There are 200 million Muslims on our doorstep, and they are becoming more devout and dangerous by the day.

    1. Billy Chickens says

      One always “negotiates” when there is something to gain from the other side and there is no “negotiating” when the other person is stark raving mad. So the policeman did what? Walk over to “negotiate” with the insane Muslim saying if he calmed down and left quietly he wouldn’t be reprimanded?

      In a situation like this, shoot first, then “negotiate”.

    1. utis says

      Lone wolf. Self-radicalized nutcase. No group involved. Everyone who’s not dead or severely injured, move along. The rest of us are safe; don’t worry. STOP LOOKING!

    1. Suleiman Haq says

      This is not as per Islamic law. He should have made the church goers recite the Shahada, upon which they would have been deemed to be converted to Islam and hence the Government would then be forced as per Islamic law to ensure they remain Muslims or execute them on charges of apostasy

        • CogitoErgoSum says

          Conversion by use of the sword followed by the threat of death for apostasy. That’s real Islam ….. the “religion of peace.” (Truth in advertising rules do not apply to Islam.)

  1. Kiki says

    Thank goodness none of the people at the church were killed!

    It’s sad that people have to consider armed guards and extra security just to worship in a church, but self-defense is critical in cases like this.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Islam demands freedom of religion when it is weak and has to co-exist with other religions. When it has the power it denies this same freedom of religion to other religions

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment